12.05.2015 Views

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24<br />

Svante E. Cornell and Halil Magnus Karaveli<br />

front, nevertheless many observers doubted the authenticity of the claim,<br />

calling it instead a pure Al Qaeda operation.<br />

More consequential perhaps is Turkish Hizbullah, unrelated to its Middle<br />

Eastern namesake. Created with Iranian support in the 1980s, Hizbullah<br />

came to gain strength in the Kurdish areas of <strong>Turkey</strong>, capitalizing on the<br />

dominance of the more orthodox Shafi’i school and the lack of following for<br />

the PKK’s Marxist-Leninist ideology. Indeed, Hizbullah came into violent<br />

confrontation with the PKK in the early 1990s, something that led to<br />

unconfirmed speculations that the Turkish military supported or even<br />

created the group. What is clear is that the military refrained from targeting<br />

Hizbullah until it defeated the PKK following the capture of its leader,<br />

Abdullah Öcalan, and possibly allowed the group to stage training camps<br />

without interference. In 2000-2002, as the group had turned its attention from<br />

the PKK to civilian targets deemed un-Islamic as well as the Turkish state,<br />

the security forces began directly targeting the group and practically<br />

decimated it within a few years. 8 Following this, the group appears to have<br />

replaced its violent campaign with one to seek support among the local<br />

Kurdish population by social program, akin to the Hamas experience.<br />

These two organizations, like smaller radical groups in <strong>Turkey</strong>, stand out by<br />

their foreign linkages. With the possible exception of the Al Qaedaconnected<br />

2003 attacks, neither has been a major force in the 2000s. <strong>Turkey</strong><br />

has hence so far mainly succeeded in keeping violent Islamic extremism<br />

under control. Whether this will continue to be the case depends largely on<br />

the ongoing struggle between secularism and Islam. But barring a major<br />

upheaval that would introduce authoritarian rule repressing expressions of<br />

political Islam, there is little to suggest that the pattern of the past decades<br />

would be reversed. In the unlikely event that a repressive anti-Islamic regime<br />

emerges, however, a conceivable consequence could well be the radicalization<br />

of parts of the Islamic community in <strong>Turkey</strong>.<br />

8 Soner Çağaptay and Emrullah Uslu, ”Hizballah in <strong>Turkey</strong> Revives: Al Qaeda’s<br />

Bridge between Europe and Iraq?” Policy Watch no 946, Washington Institute for Near<br />

East Policy, January 2005.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!