12.05.2015 Views

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prospects for a ‘Torn’ <strong>Turkey</strong> 31<br />

education, 72 percent believed that moderate Islamism threatened secularism.<br />

In urban areas, 60 percent believed it to be threatened. 16<br />

The internalization of secularism is equally evident in how religiosity has<br />

come to be perceived: 62,7 percent defined themselves as “modern religious”,<br />

while 37,3 percent described themselves as “traditional religious”. The<br />

differences between the two categories are striking. 83 percent of those in the<br />

first category believed it to be possible to adhere strictly to secular and<br />

democratic values, without compromising their religiosity. Only 17 percent<br />

among the traditionally religious subscribed to that view, instead perceiving<br />

religion and democratic liberty as standing in opposition. 17<br />

Overall, these figures suggest that the enterprise of secularism has anything<br />

but weak foundations, although also suggesting that there is a strong base of<br />

religious conservatism as well.<br />

Until recently, the popular implantation of secular values had not been<br />

publicly manifested; the silence of civil society could create the impression<br />

that secularism indeed only was a matter for the bureaucratic elite and for the<br />

military. The crisis of 2007-<strong>2008</strong> partly changed that perception as a new,<br />

popular mobilization in favor of secularism took place. During the spring of<br />

2007, a time of growing political controversy over the upcoming presidential<br />

election, millions gathered at “republican rallies” saying “No to Sharia and<br />

no to a coup”. Western observers largely failed to appreciate the significance<br />

and novelty of these rallies; indeed, western observers presumed the<br />

participants were seeking to restore an authoritarian order. The organizing<br />

force behind the rallies was the “Atatürk thought association”, at the time led<br />

by a former four-star general, who was subsequently arrested in the summer<br />

of <strong>2008</strong> at a round-up of suspected coup-plotters (but who was yet to be<br />

charged with a crime several months later). There is no reason to doubt the<br />

democratic sincerity of the majority of the millions who gathered at the prosecular<br />

rallies.<br />

The participants were predominantly urban middle class women and notably<br />

Alevis, both groups which have been increasingly alarmed by the tide of<br />

16 Ertuğrul Özkök, Hürriyet, 15 May <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

17 “Orta sınıf darbeye karsı” [Middle class opposed to coup], Milliyet, 26 October 2007.<br />

(http://www.milliyet.com.tr/2007/<strong>10</strong>/26/guncel/axgun01.html)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!