12.05.2015 Views

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary<br />

In October <strong>2008</strong>, The Turkish republic celebrates its eighty-fifth anniversary.<br />

By early November, seventy years have passed since the death of the founder<br />

of the secular and unitary republic, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. These<br />

anniversaries coincide with a defining moment in the history of the Turkish<br />

republic. Severe ideological tensions have erupted as traditional republican<br />

notions about the role of religion in society and about the nation-state have<br />

come to be increasingly challenged.<br />

In 2007 and <strong>2008</strong>, <strong>Turkey</strong> was shaken by a regime crisis in which the ruling<br />

Islamic conservatives of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) were<br />

pitted against the secular opposition in other parts of the state establishment<br />

and in civil society. The decision of the constitutional court in the summer of<br />

<strong>2008</strong> not to close down the AKP marked the end of the acute crisis, although<br />

not of the age-old struggle over the identity of <strong>Turkey</strong>.<br />

Internal as well as external dynamics underpin the power of the Islamic<br />

conservatives. Having been wielding significant power in society for a long<br />

time, the Islamic movement has come close also to achieving the goal of<br />

controlling the state. By all accounts, with the survival of the AKP, <strong>Turkey</strong><br />

has passed a critical threshold.<br />

From a Western policy perspective, there are two basic questions to be asked<br />

about <strong>Turkey</strong>. The first concerns the perceptions of the nature of Islamic<br />

conservatism: to what degree is the assumption that guides U.S. and<br />

European policy – that it is a force for reform that will make Turkish society<br />

more democratic, securing <strong>Turkey</strong> as a Western asset – ideologically as well<br />

as strategically warranted? The second concerns how the forces of secularism<br />

are to be conceptualized. Notably, how is the military to be understood? How<br />

can it be predicted to act as <strong>Turkey</strong> becomes a country dominated by Islamic<br />

conservatism?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!