2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Summary<br />
In October <strong>2008</strong>, The Turkish republic celebrates its eighty-fifth anniversary.<br />
By early November, seventy years have passed since the death of the founder<br />
of the secular and unitary republic, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. These<br />
anniversaries coincide with a defining moment in the history of the Turkish<br />
republic. Severe ideological tensions have erupted as traditional republican<br />
notions about the role of religion in society and about the nation-state have<br />
come to be increasingly challenged.<br />
In 2007 and <strong>2008</strong>, <strong>Turkey</strong> was shaken by a regime crisis in which the ruling<br />
Islamic conservatives of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) were<br />
pitted against the secular opposition in other parts of the state establishment<br />
and in civil society. The decision of the constitutional court in the summer of<br />
<strong>2008</strong> not to close down the AKP marked the end of the acute crisis, although<br />
not of the age-old struggle over the identity of <strong>Turkey</strong>.<br />
Internal as well as external dynamics underpin the power of the Islamic<br />
conservatives. Having been wielding significant power in society for a long<br />
time, the Islamic movement has come close also to achieving the goal of<br />
controlling the state. By all accounts, with the survival of the AKP, <strong>Turkey</strong><br />
has passed a critical threshold.<br />
From a Western policy perspective, there are two basic questions to be asked<br />
about <strong>Turkey</strong>. The first concerns the perceptions of the nature of Islamic<br />
conservatism: to what degree is the assumption that guides U.S. and<br />
European policy – that it is a force for reform that will make Turkish society<br />
more democratic, securing <strong>Turkey</strong> as a Western asset – ideologically as well<br />
as strategically warranted? The second concerns how the forces of secularism<br />
are to be conceptualized. Notably, how is the military to be understood? How<br />
can it be predicted to act as <strong>Turkey</strong> becomes a country dominated by Islamic<br />
conservatism?