2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
2008_10_SRP_CornellKaraveli_Turkey
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
36<br />
Svante E. Cornell and Halil Magnus Karaveli<br />
At another level, the Kemalist experience has come to be reassessed, in the<br />
West as well as in <strong>Turkey</strong> as awareness of the seriousness of the Kurdish<br />
question has grown since the 1990s. The Kurdish insurgency, which began in<br />
the 1980s, and which the Turkish state has had great difficulties subduing, is<br />
another reason why the republican construction – which rests on the twin<br />
pillars of secularism and the nation-state – as a whole has tended to become<br />
intellectually de-legitimized, or at least has come to be questioned. The<br />
apparent difficulty of maintaining the integrity of the nation-state has<br />
suggested to liberal, modernist intellectuals, who themselves are the product<br />
of the modernizing republic, that the republican enterprise in its entirety is<br />
misconceived.<br />
The Challenge of Ethnic Separatism<br />
As an ancient crossroads of civilization, <strong>Turkey</strong> has always been multiethnic,<br />
with over 50 ethnic groups represented in the country today. 24 With<br />
the globalization and modernization processes gaining strength in recent<br />
decades, <strong>Turkey</strong> experiences two conflicting developments. On the one hand,<br />
<strong>Turkey</strong> experiences an integration of the population into a Turkish identity,<br />
spurred by urbanization and education; but on the other, a process of<br />
rediscovery of ethnic identity among minority populations.<br />
It is difficult to draw an ethnic map of <strong>Turkey</strong>, for at least two reasons: first,<br />
ethnicity has been a sensitive and delicate issue in a nationalizing nationstate,<br />
something that the conflict involving separatist Kurdish movements<br />
further exacerbated. Second, modern <strong>Turkey</strong> on the whole is an example of<br />
the successful integration of many population groups into a common,<br />
Turkish identity. Turkishness has traditionally not been defined by<br />
ethnicity. “The people of <strong>Turkey</strong> that founded the Turkish republic are<br />
called Turks”, Atatürk put it. Thus, as in the French case, Turkish national<br />
identity has rested on common citizenship, not on blood ties. It is legion for<br />
Turks to extol the melting pot of Turks, Arabs, Kurds, and peoples of<br />
Caucasian and Balkan origins intermarrying and developing the modern<br />
Turkish nation. And indeed, this characterization is in many ways correct, as<br />
people of mixed and varied background now identify primarily as Turks.<br />
24 Peter Alford Andrews, Türkiye’de Etnik Gruplar, Istanbul: Ant Yayınları, 1992.