23.06.2015 Views

beyondukraine.euandrussiainsearchofanewrelation

beyondukraine.euandrussiainsearchofanewrelation

beyondukraine.euandrussiainsearchofanewrelation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Logic of U.S. Engagement 101<br />

welfare for the rich” 20 . Nevertheless, the United States has, at the<br />

same time, been unwilling to change the incentive basis for<br />

European investment in defense and broader strategic engagement.<br />

When taken together, the European members of NATO have<br />

two nuclear powers and over 2 million people collectively in<br />

uniform. Still, while the U.S. was spending 31 per cent of its<br />

defense budget on capability investments, the European allies<br />

spent a combined 22 per cent. Most European defense spending<br />

was national and not coordinated to allow for specialization and<br />

thus lower costs 21 . In 2013, for example, France sent 2,400 ground<br />

troops in an intervention into the African country Mali to combat<br />

radical Islamic militias with links to al-Qaeda. The French force<br />

was small – but the remaining total collective European<br />

contribution was just 450 troops – and limited to a post-crisis<br />

training mission. France could not sustain the operation alone and<br />

had to turn to Washington to provide enabling forces. The absence<br />

of European capability underscored growing costs to the United<br />

States even when an ally tried to lead. For example, the C-17<br />

cargo plane, which the U.S. contributed to move French troops<br />

and equipment cost about $225 million per plane to procure. This<br />

cost the U.S. about $4.5 billion in terms of new planes and<br />

existing maintenance of procurements and about $12,000 per hour<br />

to fly. Personnel costs run about $385,000 per service member<br />

associated with each plane – which grow higher with training<br />

costs for pilots and do not account for retirement and other<br />

associated long-term benefits 22 .<br />

Former Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, had warned in<br />

2011 that NATO faced a “dim, if not dismal future” and that<br />

“there will be a dwindling appetite and patience in the U.S.<br />

Congress – and in the American body politic writ large – to<br />

expend increasingly precious funds on behalf of nations that are<br />

20 B. Posen, “Pull Back: The Case for a Less Activist Foreign Policy”, Foreign Affairs,<br />

vol. 92, no. 1, January/February 2013, p. 121.<br />

21 J. Dempsey, “How Much Are Americans Willing to Spend to Defend Europe”,<br />

International Herald Tribune, 7 January 2013.<br />

22 This data is compiled by P. Carter, “The French Connection”, Foreign Policy, 23<br />

January 2013.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!