beyondukraine.euandrussiainsearchofanewrelation
beyondukraine.euandrussiainsearchofanewrelation
beyondukraine.euandrussiainsearchofanewrelation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Seen from Moscow: Greater Europe at Risk 83<br />
before. There has been an on-going discussion between Russia and<br />
the U.S. on implementation of the treaty, but the INF itself has<br />
been treated as a separate track. It has not been correlated with<br />
other issues. However the U.S. Ukraine Freedom Support Act<br />
establishes such a link (section 10 of the Act). The danger is that<br />
Russia may be subjected to sanctions if it is suspected of violating<br />
the treaty. The mechanism of sanctions is not clearly stated in the<br />
Act in regard to INF. But the very spirit of the Act and the fact<br />
that INF has become a part of Ukrainian affairs is a matter of<br />
tremendous concern. This may undermine the treaty, which has<br />
been a fundamental achievement in Russia-West relations.<br />
Consequently, it will make Europe much less secure, promoting<br />
the arms race in a very sensitive sphere.<br />
In particular, the dialogue on missile defense should be<br />
continued. Worsening relations with Russia could trigger the<br />
deployment of missile defenses in Europe as well as Russia’s<br />
response to neutralize the potential threat to its nuclear forces. If<br />
earlier the parties managed to find a compromise, now the<br />
situation may result in an arms race, and the absence of any<br />
interaction. There is a risk that missile defense will be approached<br />
as a means to contain Russia. This justifies Russia’s old fears and<br />
suspicions about the ‘real aims’ of the program and undermines<br />
trust, which is already close to zero. Tentative ideas on joint<br />
institutions to manage and operate missile defense as a measure of<br />
trust will hardly get back on the agenda in the foreseeable future.<br />
Russia and NATO relations represent another crucial issue.<br />
Institutional mechanisms are phased out. The NATO-Russia<br />
Council (NRC) raised many questions and aroused censure. But it<br />
left open the possibility to exchange views and coordinate<br />
positions. This platform is now frozen indefinitely. Meanwhile,<br />
this could be a mechanism to reduce the risk of a political<br />
escalation, caused by unintended accidents between Russia and<br />
NATO arms forces.<br />
At the same time the dialogue on Conventional Forces in<br />
Europe is mired in deadlock. In the short and mid-term<br />
perspective, we are likely to witness a conventional arms race and