Notwithstanding the increase in average loan volume,Agribusiness period-end loan volume decreased to$18.9 billion at December 31, 2011 from $22.7 billion atDecember 31, 2010. The decrease in period-end loan volumeresulted from lower seasonal agribusiness lending due to adrop in prices for some agricultural commodities in the latterpart of 2011 as well as changing delivery patterns at graincooperatives.Agribusiness recorded a $37.0 million provision for loanlosses in 2011 compared to $7.2 million for 2010. Theincrease reflects an overall higher level of averageAgribusiness commitments as well as specific creditchallenges facing a small number of customers. Net chargeoffsdecreased to $4.0 million in 2011 compared to$21.7 million for 2010. Nonaccrual loans decreased to$80.3 million at December 31, 2011 compared to$93.4 million at December 31, 2010.Noninterest income in our Agribusiness segmentincreased by $19.8 million in 2011 due to a decrease in thelevel of impairment losses in our investment portfolio and anincrease in fee income, which was driven primarily by greaterarrangement fees. Noninterest income also improved due tocustomer derivative income and the gain on the sale of aninvestment security in 2011. As described on page 37, the2010 period included refunds of a portion of Insurance Fundpremiums paid in prior years. Operating expenses in ourAgribusiness segment increased by $28.0 million in 2011 dueto greater employee compensation expense, merger-relatedexpenses and Insurance Fund premiums. Income tax expensein the Agribusiness operating segment increased $23.5 milliondue to the growth in pretax earnings.Strategic RelationshipsOverviewAs of year-end 2011, the Strategic Relationshipsoperating segment includes the direct funding relationshipswith our four affiliated Association customer-owners, as wellas our funding relationships with nonaffiliated Systeminstitutions. See Note 17 to the accompanying consolidatedfinancial statements for further discussion of our affiliatedAssociations. In addition, the supplemental schedules thatfollow the accompanying consolidated financial statementscontain unaudited combined financial information of ouraffiliated Associations.As a result of the merger with AgBank, on January 1,2012 the number of our affiliated Associations increased by 25and now includes Associations headquartered in Arizona,California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas,Maine, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, Vermont andWashington. The merger resulted in an $18.9 billion increasein outstanding loan volume in our Strategic Relationshipsoperating segment on January 1, 2012. For additionalinformation on the financial impact of the merger, refer toNote 18 for our unaudited pro forma condensed combinedfinancial statements as of December 31, 2011.At December 31, 2011, our Strategic Relationshipsportfolio included $11.2 billion of direct loans to our fouraffiliated Associations and $4.0 billion of purchasedparticipations in loans made by three other System banks tocertain of their affiliated Associations, most notably, the FarmCredit Bank of Texas ($3.4 billion).We are focused on developing and maintaining strongrelationships with Farm Credit Associations and banks.Partnerships with Associations allow us to provide credit andnon-credit services to a more diverse set of customers. TheAssociations’ strong market presence and local relationshipmanagement, combined with our product suite and lendingcapacity, provide a competitive advantage in attracting andretaining customers.2011 PerformanceAverage Strategic Relationships loan volume increased1 percent to $15.2 billion in 2011 compared to $15.1 billion in2010, reflecting modest loan demand at our affiliatedAssociations. Strategic Relationships net income increasedslightly to $80.8 million for 2011 from $80.4 million for2010. The increase in earnings was primarily the result ofa $2.2 million increase in net interest income, partiallyoffset by the impact of merger-related expenses. StrategicRelationships has no income tax expense as the earningson its business activities are tax exempt.Overall loan quality in our Strategic Relationshipsportfolio remains strong. As a wholesale lender to Associationcustomers, we benefit from the diversification of theAssociation loan portfolios and our strong collateral position.In addition, the earnings, capital and loan loss reserves of theAssociations provide us a buffer from losses in their respectiveloan portfolios. Lower margins in the Strategic Relationshipsoperating segment are commensurate with the lower riskprofile and lower regulatory capital requirements. Noprovisions for loan losses or reserve for credit exposure havebeen recorded related to any loan to an Association. The creditquality classifications of loans to two nonaffiliatedAssociations were upgraded in 2011 from the ‘Substandard’and ‘Special Mention’ categories to ‘Acceptable.’<strong>CoBank</strong> 2011 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>41
Rural InfrastructureOverviewThe Rural Infrastructure operating segment includes loanand other financial services to companies in the power,communications and water industries. Primary products andservices include term loan and revolving line of creditfinancing, leasing, project financing, tax-exempt bondissuances, capital markets services and cash management andinvestment products.Power industry customers include rural electric generationand transmission cooperatives, electric distributioncooperatives, renewable energy providers, independent powerproducers, and investor-owned utilities. Loan demand frompower supply customers has declined as a result of continuedweakness in the economy and regulatory uncertainty.Nonetheless, customers undertaking infrastructureenhancements to meet long-term requirements or to complywith environmental regulations continue to demand debtcapital. Growth in renewable energy projects also contributesto loan demand from power supply customers. Loan growthhas also resulted from opportunities to refinance theborrowings of other lenders, particularly in the electricdistribution sector.Communications industry customers include rural localexchange carriers, wireless providers, data transport networks,and cable television systems. We focus on ruralcommunications companies that are positioned to provide arange of services, including voice (both wireline and wireless),broadband and video. Loan volume in our communicationsportfolio declined in 2011 due to weak demand for debtcapital and increased availability of government stimulusfunding in certain sectors. However, we anticipate futureopportunities in merger and acquisition activity, and expectconsolidation to continue as carriers seek to improve operatingefficiencies and gain market share in this highly competitiveindustry. Capital spending will also likely continue as wirelinecarriers enhance their networks with fiber optics and wirelesscarriers upgrade to fourth generation (4G) data technology.Water industry customers include rural water and wastewater companies. Capital expenditure growth in this industrycontinues primarily as a result of the need to replace aginginfrastructure and to meet tighter standards for water quality.While much of this need has been filled by financing fromfederal stimulus programs, some private lending opportunitiesfor construction/interim financing have been created as abridge to government grants or loans. With the continuingneed for plant upgrades and expected limitations on theavailability of stimulus funds, we expect private lending tothis industry to grow.2011 PerformanceRural Infrastructure net income increased 11 percent to$194.4 million for 2011 from $175.6 million for 2010. Theincrease in earnings primarily resulted from a $31.8 milliondecrease in the provision for loan losses and a $14.7 milliondecrease in operating expenses.Net interest income declined to $300.9 million for 2011from $315.6 million in the prior year primarily as a result oflower returns on our invested capital, partially offset by amodest increase in average loan volume. Average loan volumegrew 3 percent to $11.9 billion in 2011 from $11.5 billion in2010. Growth in Rural Infrastructure average loan volumeprimarily resulted from increased lending activity in theelectric distribution sector driven by refinancing of borrowingsfrom other lenders. This growth was partially offset by adecline in loans to our communications customers.Rural Infrastructure recorded a $21.0 million provisionfor loan losses in 2011, compared to a $52.8 million provisionin the prior year. The decrease in the provision for loan lossesprimarily resulted from the resolution of a troubled loan to acommunications customer in 2011, as well as greaterprovisions in the 2010 period for specific customers in ourrural energy portfolio. Nonaccrual loans decreased to$54.5 million at December 31, 2011 from $73.6 million atDecember 31, 2010. Rural Infrastructure recorded net chargeoffsof $12.5 million and $36.0 million for 2011 and 2010,respectively. Net charge-offs in both periods related to a smallnumber of rural energy and communications customers.Noninterest income in the Rural Infrastructure operatingsegment was $42.1 million in 2011 compared to $41.8 millionin 2010. The 2011 results include a higher level of fee income,primarily driven by greater arrangement fees, lowerinvestment impairment losses, greater customer derivativeincome and a gain on the sale of an investment security. Asnoted previously, 2010 results included refunds of a portion ofInsurance Fund premiums paid in prior years.Rural Infrastructure operating expenses decreased by$14.7 million in 2011. Operating expenses in 2010 includedcosts related to the settlement of a business dispute. Excludingsuch prior-year costs, operating expenses in 2011 increasedprimarily due to greater employee compensation and mergerrelatedcosts, and, to a lesser extent, increased Insurance Fundpremium expenses. Rural Infrastructure income tax expenseincreased $13.3 million due to growth in its pre-tax earnings.<strong>CoBank</strong> 2011 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>42
- Page 4 and 5: Everett DobrinskiChairmanRobert B.
- Page 6 and 7: “ We firmly believe the combined
- Page 8 and 9: associations are partnering with Co
- Page 11 and 12: 2012 BOARD OF DIRECTORSOccupation:F
- Page 13 and 14: “WE ARE COMMITTEDTO GOOD GOVERNAN
- Page 15 and 16: U.S. AgBank CEO Darryl Rhodes (fron
- Page 17 and 18: KansasNew MexicoUtahFC of Ness City
- Page 19 and 20: CorporateCitizenshipAT COBANKSuppor
- Page 21 and 22: StrategicRelationshipsFarm Credit o
- Page 23 and 24: RegionalAgribusinessBANKING GROUPCe
- Page 25 and 26: CorporateAgribusinessBANKING GROUPK
- Page 27 and 28: ElectricDistributionBANKING DIVISIO
- Page 29 and 30: Power SupplyBANKING DIVISIONTri-Sta
- Page 31 and 32: IndustryPortfoliosCoBank ended 2011
- Page 33 and 34: CoBank is a financially strong,depe
- Page 35 and 36: 30COBANK 2011ANNUAL REPORTbuilding
- Page 37 and 38: The information and disclosures con
- Page 39 and 40: Financial Condition andResults of O
- Page 41 and 42: Provision for Loan Losses and Reser
- Page 43 and 44: Purchased services expense decrease
- Page 45: AgribusinessOverviewThe Agribusines
- Page 49 and 50: Credit ApprovalThe most critical el
- Page 51 and 52: Total nonaccrual loans were $134.9
- Page 53 and 54: Basis RiskBasis risk arises due to
- Page 55 and 56: Our net interest income is lower in
- Page 57 and 58: The notional amount of our derivati
- Page 59 and 60: Reputation Risk ManagementReputatio
- Page 61 and 62: Investment Securities ($ in Million
- Page 63 and 64: In accordance with the Farm Credit
- Page 65 and 66: Critical Accounting EstimatesManage
- Page 67 and 68: Business OutlookWe closed our merge
- Page 69 and 70: Consolidated Income StatementsCoBan
- Page 71 and 72: Consolidated Statements of Cash Flo
- Page 73 and 74: Consolidated Statements of Changes
- Page 75 and 76: LoansWe report loans, excluding lea
- Page 77 and 78: If we determine that a derivative n
- Page 79 and 80: Reserve for Credit ExposureThe foll
- Page 81 and 82: The information in the tables under
- Page 83 and 84: The following tables present inform
- Page 85 and 86: At December 31, 2011, gross minimum
- Page 87 and 88: For impaired investment securities,
- Page 89 and 90: At December 31, 2011, the assets of
- Page 91 and 92: Preferred StockThe following table
- Page 93 and 94: The following table provides a summ
- Page 95 and 96: AssumptionsWe measure plan obligati
- Page 97 and 98:
Incentive Compensation PlansWe have
- Page 99 and 100:
Note 11 - Derivative FinancialInstr
- Page 101 and 102:
A summary of the impact of derivati
- Page 103 and 104:
Due to the uncertainty of expected
- Page 105 and 106:
Assets and Liabilities Measured atF
- Page 107 and 108:
Note 14 - Segment Financial Informa
- Page 109 and 110:
Note 15 - Commitments and Contingen
- Page 111 and 112:
Note 18 - Subsequent Events (Unaudi
- Page 113 and 114:
Supplemental District Financial Inf
- Page 115 and 116:
Supplemental District Financial Inf
- Page 117 and 118:
Report of Independent AuditorsCoBan
- Page 119 and 120:
Management’s Report on Internal C
- Page 121 and 122:
Annual Report to Shareholders Discl
- Page 123 and 124:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 125 and 126:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 127 and 128:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 129 and 130:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 131 and 132:
Senior OfficersCoBank, ACBRobert B.
- Page 133 and 134:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 135 and 136:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 137 and 138:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 139 and 140:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 141 and 142:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 143 and 144:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 145 and 146:
Code of EthicsCoBank, ACBCoBank set
- Page 147 and 148:
CERTIFICATIONI, Robert B. Engel, Pr
- Page 149 and 150:
LeadershipCoBank, ACBRobert B. Enge
- Page 151 and 152:
OfficeLocationsCoBank National Offi