Strategic RelationshipsApproximately $15.2 billion of our total loan portfolio atDecember 31, 2011 represented direct loans to our affiliatedAssociations and participations in the direct loans ofnonaffiliated Associations. The risk factors previouslydiscussed in the “Agribusiness” section can also affect loanquality at Associations; however, the impact of such factors onfarmers and other producers served by Associations may notbe the same as the impact on cooperatives and other customersserved by our Agribusiness operating segment. The loanquality of our Strategic Relationships portfolio is enhanced byour strong collateral position and the earnings, capital and loanloss reserves of the Associations, which provide us a bufferfrom losses in their respective loan portfolios.Rural InfrastructureWe fund the construction, operations and maintenanceactivities of rural energy, communications and watercompanies. A general slowdown in the U.S. economy canreduce industrial and residential demand for services andnegatively affect customers in our Rural Infrastructureportfolio. Changes in credit markets can also impact ourability to buy and sell loans in this portfolio.Fluctuating weather conditions can adversely affect ourcustomers in the energy industry. The pace and degree of therestructuring of the electric energy industry in the UnitedStates, including the need for additional generating capacityand the lack of open access transmission, may also impactfuture loan quality. Further, constraints on carbon emissionsand other environmental standards could adversely impactenergy customers.The communications industry is affected by significantcompetition. Regulatory, legislative and technological changesmay impact the future competitive position and markets forthe communications industry. These factors may placedownward pressure on the loan quality of certain sectors of thecommunications industry. In addition, decreased cash flowsand the resultant impact on asset valuation, the inability tosuccessfully integrate merged or acquired companies, or thelack of availability of debt and equity capital could adverselyaffect certain communications customers.Credit Quality Conditions and Measurements inOur Loan PortfolioThe following table presents loans and related accruedinterest receivable classified, by management, pursuant to ourregulator’s Uniform Loan Classification System, as a percentof total loans and related accrued interest.Loan Quality RatiosDecember 31, 2011 2010 2009Acceptable 96.68 % 94.76 % 95.83 %Special Mention 2.07 3.53 2.00Substandard 1.20 1.62 2.02Doubtful 0.05 0.09 0.15Loss - - -Total 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 %The overall credit quality in our loan portfolio improvedin 2011. Adversely classified loans (‘Substandard’ and‘Doubtful’) decreased to 1.25 percent of total loans and relatedaccrued interest at December 31, 2011, compared to1.71 percent at December 31, 2010, while ‘Special Mention’loans decreased to 2.07 percent of loans and related accruedinterest from 3.53 percent. These improvements included theimpact of upgrades in the credit quality classification of loansto two nonaffiliated Associations. At December 31, 2010, a$150.0 million loan to a nonaffiliated Association wasclassified as ‘Substandard’ while another $400.0 million loanwas classified as ‘Special Mention.’ Both of these loans wereupgraded to ‘Acceptable’ in 2011. We have a strong collateralposition in the assets of Association borrowers, and theearnings, capital and loan loss reserves of the Associationsserve as an additional layer of protection against losses. Noprovisions for loan losses or reserve for credit exposure havebeen recorded at the Bank related to any loans to Associations.Summary of High-Risk Assets ($ in Millions)December 31, 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007Nonaccrual Loans $ 135$ 167$ 308$ 218$ 15Accruing Loans 90 Days or More Past Due - 1 15 4 2Restructured Loans - - - - -Total Impaired Loans 135 168 323 222 17Other Property Owned 1 7 - - -Total High-Risk Assets $ 136$ 175$ 323$ 222$ 17<strong>CoBank</strong> 2011 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>45
Total nonaccrual loans were $134.9 million atDecember 31, 2011 compared to $167.0 million and$307.6 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.The decrease from 2010 to 2011 reflected the pay down ofbalances as well as charge-offs related to a small number ofagribusiness and communications customers. The decrease innonaccruals from 2009 to 2010 was primarily due to chargeoffsrelated to agribusiness, rural energy and communicationscustomers, the return to accruing status of certain agribusinesscustomers whose financial performance improved, and thesale of a limited number of nonaccrual loans in ourcommunications portfolio. Nonaccrual loans as a percent ofour total loan portfolio was 0.29 percent as of December 31,2011 compared to 0.33 percent at December 31, 2010. Overthe past 10 years, nonaccrual loans have averaged 0.60 percentof the total loan portfolio.Net loan charge-offs totaled $16.6 million in 2011 and$57.6 million in 2010. Gross charge-offs in 2011 were$23.5 million compared to $76.4 million in 2010. Grosscharge-offs in 2011 were primarily associated with a limitednumber of agribusiness, communications and rural energycustomers.Our reserve for credit exposure totaled $542.0 million andrepresented 1.17 percent of outstanding loans as of the end of2011, compared to 1.00 percent and 1.13 percent of total loansat December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. AtDecember 31, 2011, our reserve for credit exposurerepresented 1.92 percent of non-guaranteed loans whenexcluding loans to Associations.While overall loan quality improved in 2011, we couldsee a decline in credit quality in certain areas of our loanportfolio as a result of ongoing challenges in the globaleconomy. As part of our overall assessment of risk in the loanportfolio and the reserve for credit exposure as ofDecember 31, 2011, we have considered a wide variety offactors impacting the industries we serve. These includeweakness in the global economy and increasing sovereign debtissues; the slow and prolonged recovery of the U.S. economy,along with a constrained ability to respond to additionalgeopolitical or economic shocks, and the related impact toconsumer markets that are particularly important to animalprotein, dairy, communications and energy customers;changes in grain markets and the impact of commodity pricevolatility on the liquidity, leverage and earnings of our farmsupply and grain marketing, and animal protein customers;adverse weather resulting in delayed and prevented plantings,and transportation issues creating volatility and risk in thesemarkets; a decline in the value of poorly positioned powergeneration assets in the wake of uncertain environmentalpolicy as well as easing industrial and commercial demand forpower; the potential negative impact of reforms to subsidiesthat impact certain communications customers; and asignificant level of customer concentrations.See “Critical Accounting Estimates – Reserve for CreditExposure” on page 60 for a more complete description of ourprocess to determine the adequacy of our reserve for creditexposure.Credit Risk Related to Investments and DerivativesWe minimize credit risk in our liquidity investmentportfolio by investing primarily in securities issued orguaranteed by the U.S. government or one of its agencies. Atyear-end 2011, approximately 98 percent of our investmentportfolio is composed of securities with either an implicit orexplicit guarantee of the U.S. government. More specifically,41 percent of our investment portfolio securities carry a fullfaith and credit guarantee of the U.S. government. Suchsecurities include mortgage-backed securities issued by theGovernment National Mortgage Association, and U.S.Treasury and other debt securities, including loans backed bythe Small Business Administration. Approximately 57 percentof our investment portfolio consists of securities issued bygovernment agencies that carry the implicit backing of theU.S. government, primarily mortgage-backed securities issuedby the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FreddieMac). Government actions since mid-2008 to strengthen thecapital of, and improve the liquidity of securities issued by,Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac indicate a strong level of supportby the U.S. government regarding the obligations of thesehousing GSEs. To a much lesser extent, and largely prior to2006, we also invested in non-agency mortgage- and assetbackedsecurities. Such securities comprised approximately2 percent of our investment portfolio at December 31, 2011.The significant downturn in the U.S. housing andemployment markets, coupled with the deterioration in thefinancial conditions of certain bond insurers, led to theimpairment of certain of our non-agency investment securities.The credit quality of our investment portfolio as ofDecember 31, 2011 and impairment losses on investmentsecurities are more fully discussed in “Liquidity and CapitalResources” beginning on page 55.Our counterparty credit risk arising from derivativetransactions is managed within credit methodologies andlimits approved by the CLC. Managing counterparty exposureis more fully discussed in “Counterparty Exposure” beginningon page 51.Interest Rate Risk ManagementWe are subject to interest rate risk, which is defined as therisk of changes to future earnings and long-term market valueof equity due to changes in interest rates. This risk primarilyarises from our equity positioning and differences in thetiming between the contractual maturities, repricingcharacteristics, and prepayments of our assets and thefinancing obtained to fund these assets. This risk can also arisefrom embedded caps in certain of our investments anddifferences between the interest rate indices used to price andfund our assets. Our asset/liability management objective is tomanage the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearingliabilities to reduce interest rate risk and stabilize our netinterest income while optimizing profitability and insulatingshareholders’ equity from significant adverse fluctuations inmarket interest rates. While we actively manage our interestrate risk position within policy limits approved by the Boardof Directors using strategies established by our ALCO, there<strong>CoBank</strong> 2011 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>46
- Page 4 and 5: Everett DobrinskiChairmanRobert B.
- Page 6 and 7: “ We firmly believe the combined
- Page 8 and 9: associations are partnering with Co
- Page 11 and 12: 2012 BOARD OF DIRECTORSOccupation:F
- Page 13 and 14: “WE ARE COMMITTEDTO GOOD GOVERNAN
- Page 15 and 16: U.S. AgBank CEO Darryl Rhodes (fron
- Page 17 and 18: KansasNew MexicoUtahFC of Ness City
- Page 19 and 20: CorporateCitizenshipAT COBANKSuppor
- Page 21 and 22: StrategicRelationshipsFarm Credit o
- Page 23 and 24: RegionalAgribusinessBANKING GROUPCe
- Page 25 and 26: CorporateAgribusinessBANKING GROUPK
- Page 27 and 28: ElectricDistributionBANKING DIVISIO
- Page 29 and 30: Power SupplyBANKING DIVISIONTri-Sta
- Page 31 and 32: IndustryPortfoliosCoBank ended 2011
- Page 33 and 34: CoBank is a financially strong,depe
- Page 35 and 36: 30COBANK 2011ANNUAL REPORTbuilding
- Page 37 and 38: The information and disclosures con
- Page 39 and 40: Financial Condition andResults of O
- Page 41 and 42: Provision for Loan Losses and Reser
- Page 43 and 44: Purchased services expense decrease
- Page 45 and 46: AgribusinessOverviewThe Agribusines
- Page 47 and 48: Rural InfrastructureOverviewThe Rur
- Page 49: Credit ApprovalThe most critical el
- Page 53 and 54: Basis RiskBasis risk arises due to
- Page 55 and 56: Our net interest income is lower in
- Page 57 and 58: The notional amount of our derivati
- Page 59 and 60: Reputation Risk ManagementReputatio
- Page 61 and 62: Investment Securities ($ in Million
- Page 63 and 64: In accordance with the Farm Credit
- Page 65 and 66: Critical Accounting EstimatesManage
- Page 67 and 68: Business OutlookWe closed our merge
- Page 69 and 70: Consolidated Income StatementsCoBan
- Page 71 and 72: Consolidated Statements of Cash Flo
- Page 73 and 74: Consolidated Statements of Changes
- Page 75 and 76: LoansWe report loans, excluding lea
- Page 77 and 78: If we determine that a derivative n
- Page 79 and 80: Reserve for Credit ExposureThe foll
- Page 81 and 82: The information in the tables under
- Page 83 and 84: The following tables present inform
- Page 85 and 86: At December 31, 2011, gross minimum
- Page 87 and 88: For impaired investment securities,
- Page 89 and 90: At December 31, 2011, the assets of
- Page 91 and 92: Preferred StockThe following table
- Page 93 and 94: The following table provides a summ
- Page 95 and 96: AssumptionsWe measure plan obligati
- Page 97 and 98: Incentive Compensation PlansWe have
- Page 99 and 100: Note 11 - Derivative FinancialInstr
- Page 101 and 102:
A summary of the impact of derivati
- Page 103 and 104:
Due to the uncertainty of expected
- Page 105 and 106:
Assets and Liabilities Measured atF
- Page 107 and 108:
Note 14 - Segment Financial Informa
- Page 109 and 110:
Note 15 - Commitments and Contingen
- Page 111 and 112:
Note 18 - Subsequent Events (Unaudi
- Page 113 and 114:
Supplemental District Financial Inf
- Page 115 and 116:
Supplemental District Financial Inf
- Page 117 and 118:
Report of Independent AuditorsCoBan
- Page 119 and 120:
Management’s Report on Internal C
- Page 121 and 122:
Annual Report to Shareholders Discl
- Page 123 and 124:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 125 and 126:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 127 and 128:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 129 and 130:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 131 and 132:
Senior OfficersCoBank, ACBRobert B.
- Page 133 and 134:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 135 and 136:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 137 and 138:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 139 and 140:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 141 and 142:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 143 and 144:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 145 and 146:
Code of EthicsCoBank, ACBCoBank set
- Page 147 and 148:
CERTIFICATIONI, Robert B. Engel, Pr
- Page 149 and 150:
LeadershipCoBank, ACBRobert B. Enge
- Page 151 and 152:
OfficeLocationsCoBank National Offi