The fair value of our derivative financial instruments isthe estimated amount to be received to sell a derivative assetor paid to transfer or extinguish a derivative liability in activemarkets among willing participants at the reporting date.Estimated fair values are determined through internal marketvaluation models. These models incorporate benchmarkinterest rate curves, volatilities, counterparty credit quality,and other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly inthe marketplace. We compare internally calculated derivativevaluations to broker/dealer quotes to substantiate the results.All financial models used for the determination of the fairvalue of financial instruments in the financial statements or forindependent risk monitoring purposes are periodicallyreviewed and validated in accordance with our policies.The degree of management judgment involved indetermining the fair value of a financial instrument isdependent upon the availability of observable market inputs.For financial instruments that trade actively and haveobservable market prices and inputs, there is minimalsubjectivity involved in measuring fair value. Whenobservable market prices and inputs are not fully available,management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. Inaddition, changes in market conditions may reduce theavailability of market prices or observable data. For example,reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes insecondary market activities could result in observable marketinputs becoming unavailable. When market data is notavailable, we use valuation techniques requiring moremanagement judgment to estimate the appropriate fair valuemeasurement. Changes in assumptions could affect the fairvalues.At December 31, 2011, approximately 22 percent of totalassets, or $14.1 billion, consisted of financial instrumentsrecorded at fair value. Approximately 99 percent of thesefinancial instruments used valuation methodologies involvingmarket-based or market-derived information to measure fairvalue. The remaining 1 percent of these financial instrumentsis measured using model-based techniques, constituting ourentire asset-backed securities portfolio. At December 31,2011, approximately 2 percent of total liabilities, or$939.0 million, consisted of financial instruments recorded atfair value.Recent Accounting PronouncementsIn April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board(FASB) issued guidance clarifying when a loan modificationor restructuring is considered a troubled debt restructuring.The FASB’s guidance provides criteria that a lender shouldevaluate in determining whether a borrower is experiencingfinancial difficulties and when a restructuring constitutes aconcession. For nonpublic entities, the guidance is effectivefor annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2012,including interim periods within those annual periods. Earlyadoption is permitted. The adoption of these provisions is notexpected to have a material effect on our consolidatedfinancial position, results of operations or cash flows.In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance clarifying certainaspects of fair value measurement and disclosurerequirements. The guidance is effective prospectively forreporting periods (including interim periods) beginning afterDecember 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. We willadopt these provisions in 2012; however, they are notexpected to have a material effect on our consolidatedfinancial position, results of operations or cash flows, but areexpected to result in additional fair value disclosuressurrounding our Level 3 inputs, which are discussed inNote 12 to the accompanying consolidated financialstatements.In June 2011 and in December 2011, the FASB issuedguidance which revises the manner in which entities presentcomprehensive income in their financial statements. The newguidance requires entities to report components ofcomprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement ofcomprehensive income; or (2) two separate but consecutivestatements. The guidance does not change the items that mustbe reported in other comprehensive income. These provisionsare effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within thoseyears, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption ispermitted. We will adopt these provisions effective March 31,2012. The adoption will not have an effect on our consolidatedfinancial position, results of operations or cash flows;however, it will result in changes to the presentation ofcomprehensive income.In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance creatingnew disclosure requirements about the nature of an entity’srights of setoff and related arrangements associated with itsfinancial instruments and derivative instruments. Thedisclosure requirements are effective for annual reportingperiods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interimperiods within those annual periods, with retrospectiveapplication required. We will adopt these provisions effectiveMarch 31, 2013. The adoption of these provisions is notexpected to have a material effect on our consolidatedfinancial position, results of operations or cash flows.<strong>CoBank</strong> 2011 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>61
Business OutlookWe closed our merger with AgBank on January 1, 2012.The merger will create opportunities across the industries weserve and will significantly enhance the geographic andindustry diversification of our loan portfolio. It will alsoprovide us with the opportunity to strengthen businessoperations and enhance market opportunities for <strong>CoBank</strong>‘sproducts and services. We believe the merger will create astronger, more durable financial institution with an enhancedability to fulfill its mission, both today and for futuregenerations of rural borrowers.As we look to 2012, we see a number of challenges thatcould make the lending and earnings environment lessfavorable for <strong>CoBank</strong>. Agricultural commodity prices haveretreated from last year’s highs and growth remains lacklusterin the broader economy. Loan demand in our StrategicRelationships segment has moderated due to the strongliquidity positions of many farmers and ranchers. Customersin certain of the industries we serve continue to feel the impactof unpredictable and volatile agricultural commodity prices, acontinued weak housing market, and regulatory and politicaluncertainty. These challenges could reduce the credit qualityand level of loan demand in certain sectors of our lendingportfolio. Continued weakness in the housing market and/orpersistently high unemployment could also lead to furtherlosses on our non-agency investment securities. Greaterliquidity in debt funding markets and a renewed focus bybanks on commercial lending continues to increasecompetition across many of the sectors we serve. In addition,the lower level of medium-term interest rates negativelyimpacts the return on our invested capital.In 2012, we will focus on preserving the strength of ourbalance sheet, executing on our merger integration plan andenhancing our enterprise-wide risk management capabilities.Our strong capital and liquidity position will continue toprovide the capacity to serve customers in all marketconditions. We will continue our disciplined approach tomanaging risk and will closely monitor asset quality. We willalso continue to enhance our financial condition throughprudent expense discipline and the retention of a portion ofour earnings.Our continued success will be achieved by delivering onour value proposition, creating opportunities to partner withother System institutions, increasing market share,maintaining effective access to the agency debt capitalmarkets, optimizing current lending authorities and pursuingvarious strategic alliances with other financial servicesorganizations.Under the guidance of our Board of Directors and throughthe focus of a proven executive management team, we lookforward to continuing to deliver on our value proposition onbehalf of our customers and to fulfilling our mission as adependable and strategic source of credit and financialservices to the nation’s rural economy.<strong>CoBank</strong> 2011 <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>62
- Page 4 and 5:
Everett DobrinskiChairmanRobert B.
- Page 6 and 7:
“ We firmly believe the combined
- Page 8 and 9:
associations are partnering with Co
- Page 11 and 12:
2012 BOARD OF DIRECTORSOccupation:F
- Page 13 and 14:
“WE ARE COMMITTEDTO GOOD GOVERNAN
- Page 15 and 16: U.S. AgBank CEO Darryl Rhodes (fron
- Page 17 and 18: KansasNew MexicoUtahFC of Ness City
- Page 19 and 20: CorporateCitizenshipAT COBANKSuppor
- Page 21 and 22: StrategicRelationshipsFarm Credit o
- Page 23 and 24: RegionalAgribusinessBANKING GROUPCe
- Page 25 and 26: CorporateAgribusinessBANKING GROUPK
- Page 27 and 28: ElectricDistributionBANKING DIVISIO
- Page 29 and 30: Power SupplyBANKING DIVISIONTri-Sta
- Page 31 and 32: IndustryPortfoliosCoBank ended 2011
- Page 33 and 34: CoBank is a financially strong,depe
- Page 35 and 36: 30COBANK 2011ANNUAL REPORTbuilding
- Page 37 and 38: The information and disclosures con
- Page 39 and 40: Financial Condition andResults of O
- Page 41 and 42: Provision for Loan Losses and Reser
- Page 43 and 44: Purchased services expense decrease
- Page 45 and 46: AgribusinessOverviewThe Agribusines
- Page 47 and 48: Rural InfrastructureOverviewThe Rur
- Page 49 and 50: Credit ApprovalThe most critical el
- Page 51 and 52: Total nonaccrual loans were $134.9
- Page 53 and 54: Basis RiskBasis risk arises due to
- Page 55 and 56: Our net interest income is lower in
- Page 57 and 58: The notional amount of our derivati
- Page 59 and 60: Reputation Risk ManagementReputatio
- Page 61 and 62: Investment Securities ($ in Million
- Page 63 and 64: In accordance with the Farm Credit
- Page 65: Critical Accounting EstimatesManage
- Page 69 and 70: Consolidated Income StatementsCoBan
- Page 71 and 72: Consolidated Statements of Cash Flo
- Page 73 and 74: Consolidated Statements of Changes
- Page 75 and 76: LoansWe report loans, excluding lea
- Page 77 and 78: If we determine that a derivative n
- Page 79 and 80: Reserve for Credit ExposureThe foll
- Page 81 and 82: The information in the tables under
- Page 83 and 84: The following tables present inform
- Page 85 and 86: At December 31, 2011, gross minimum
- Page 87 and 88: For impaired investment securities,
- Page 89 and 90: At December 31, 2011, the assets of
- Page 91 and 92: Preferred StockThe following table
- Page 93 and 94: The following table provides a summ
- Page 95 and 96: AssumptionsWe measure plan obligati
- Page 97 and 98: Incentive Compensation PlansWe have
- Page 99 and 100: Note 11 - Derivative FinancialInstr
- Page 101 and 102: A summary of the impact of derivati
- Page 103 and 104: Due to the uncertainty of expected
- Page 105 and 106: Assets and Liabilities Measured atF
- Page 107 and 108: Note 14 - Segment Financial Informa
- Page 109 and 110: Note 15 - Commitments and Contingen
- Page 111 and 112: Note 18 - Subsequent Events (Unaudi
- Page 113 and 114: Supplemental District Financial Inf
- Page 115 and 116: Supplemental District Financial Inf
- Page 117 and 118:
Report of Independent AuditorsCoBan
- Page 119 and 120:
Management’s Report on Internal C
- Page 121 and 122:
Annual Report to Shareholders Discl
- Page 123 and 124:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 125 and 126:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 127 and 128:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 129 and 130:
Board of Directors Disclosure as of
- Page 131 and 132:
Senior OfficersCoBank, ACBRobert B.
- Page 133 and 134:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 135 and 136:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 137 and 138:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 139 and 140:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 141 and 142:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 143 and 144:
Senior Officers Compensation Discus
- Page 145 and 146:
Code of EthicsCoBank, ACBCoBank set
- Page 147 and 148:
CERTIFICATIONI, Robert B. Engel, Pr
- Page 149 and 150:
LeadershipCoBank, ACBRobert B. Enge
- Page 151 and 152:
OfficeLocationsCoBank National Offi