10.07.2015 Views

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16.15 Acceptance <strong>of</strong> Test ResultsThe following acceptance criteria can be used as a general guide in interpreting <strong>channel</strong>bank test results:1. If the moisture content is within permitted range <strong>and</strong> the density requirement is equalor exceeded – Accept.2. If the moisture content is up to 1% outside the permitted range <strong>and</strong> the densityrequirement is equalled or exceeded – Accept only after consideration <strong>of</strong> the materialcharacteristics <strong>and</strong> risks involved.3. If the moisture content is within the permitted range <strong>and</strong> the density result is up to 2%below requirements – Order additional compaction <strong>of</strong> the placed layer, <strong>and</strong> re-testbefore acceptance.4. If the density is low – Reject.To achieve the required density, some or all <strong>of</strong> the following actions will be necessary:• loosen the placed layer to full depth, moisten or aerate as necessary, reduce layerthickness <strong>and</strong> undertake complete re-compaction.• remove the placed layer, stock pile the material, re-condition <strong>and</strong> repeat the laydown <strong>and</strong> compaction processes.If the moisture content is drier than the lower limit by more than 1%, additional passesare unlikely to achieve required density. It will only compact the upper portion <strong>of</strong> thelayer, without correcting the lower portion.If the moisture content is wetter than the upper limit by more than 1%, additional passesmay achieve the required density, provided the re-working can reduce the moisturecontent sufficiently to raise the density to the required level. Re-test before acceptance.The compaction <strong>of</strong> material in too dry a condition has been found to be one <strong>of</strong> the mainreasons for poor <strong>channel</strong> bank performance. This is attributed to the ease <strong>of</strong> h<strong>and</strong>lingmaterials on the dry side <strong>of</strong> optimum, <strong>and</strong> the tendency for the moisture content to driftoutside the lower limit during the drier parts <strong>of</strong> the year when earth works are mostfrequently undertaken.No amount <strong>of</strong> compaction will produce the required density if the material is too dry. Thecompacted material may be very hard, but hard fill does not necessarily mean that therequired density has been achieved. A sample <strong>of</strong> clay which may have a strengthapproaching that <strong>of</strong> a weak concrete when it has been dried, can become mud whenimmersed in water.For <strong>channel</strong> <strong>banks</strong>, where <strong>construction</strong> pore pressures are normally not a concern, thechances <strong>of</strong> achieving the required density are increased if the material is compacted onthe wet side rather than on the dry side <strong>of</strong> optimum. By adopting this approach, a factor<strong>of</strong> safety is introduced against placing large quantities <strong>of</strong> dry material. Sufficient timebecomes available to detect the drying out, which can be <strong>of</strong>fset by pre-wetting in theborrow area, rather than attempting to make moisture adjustments on the bank.Construction <strong>and</strong> Refurbishment <strong>of</strong> Earthen Channel Banks August 2002 - Edition 1.0 16-32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!