10.07.2015 Views

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

United States references give a wide range <strong>of</strong> seepage rates for unlined <strong>channel</strong>s, butcommon values vary from 0.02 to 0.3 m 3 /m 2 /day. Seepage rates from United States<strong>channel</strong>s before they were lined have been as high as 0.4 to 0.9 m 3 /m 2 /day. The USBureau <strong>of</strong> Reclamation refers to <strong>channel</strong> seepage losses <strong>of</strong> 0.06 m 3 /m 2 /day as beingrelatively low. By comparison, some Irrigation Authorities in Australia consider <strong>channel</strong>seepage rates <strong>of</strong> over 0.03 m 3 /m 2 /day to be high. Figures for unlined <strong>irrigation</strong> <strong>channel</strong>sin India show seepage rates generally vary from 0.025 to 0.60 m 3 /m 2 /day.22.3 Types <strong>of</strong> LiningsTo be successful, a <strong>channel</strong> lining must reduce seepage to an acceptable level atreasonable cost <strong>and</strong> maintain effectiveness for the length <strong>of</strong> time required. An ideal<strong>channel</strong> lining material should satisfy the following requirements:• cost-effective• low permeability• reasonably long service life• capable <strong>of</strong> selective application• resistance to mechanical damage, weathering <strong>and</strong> biological deterioration• flexibility over a range <strong>of</strong> temperatures• low roughness co-efficient• reasonably low capital <strong>and</strong> maintenance costs• easy to repairA wide range <strong>of</strong> <strong>channel</strong> linings have been tried in Australia <strong>and</strong> overseas with varyingdegrees <strong>of</strong> success, at widely varying costs, <strong>and</strong> each has its own specific features <strong>and</strong>promoters. There is however, relatively little information available on the long-term costs<strong>and</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the <strong>channel</strong> linings under Australian conditions. Whilemany lining treatments perform well under laboratory conditions, climatic <strong>and</strong> operationalconditions can effect their performance in the field.The different types <strong>of</strong> linings are commonly classified into three groups according to thematerials <strong>and</strong> methods used in their <strong>construction</strong>. These are:1. Earth Linings• Compacted earth lining• Compaction <strong>of</strong> insitu <strong>channel</strong> material• Bentonite type lining• Compacted soil-cement lining• Modified soil lining• Soil sealants2. Flexible Membrane Linings• Exposed Lining• Covered Lining3. Hard-Surface Linings• Concrete lining• Asphalt Lining• Brick Lining• Stone LiningConstruction <strong>and</strong> Refurbishment <strong>of</strong> Earthen Channel Banks August 2002 - Edition 1.0 22-4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!