10.07.2015 Views

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

construction and refurbishment of earthen irrigation channel banks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The disadvantages <strong>of</strong> a biological control program can be:• extremely expensive to set-up (sometimes $millions)• lengthy to set-up (<strong>of</strong>ten over ten years)• potential risk <strong>of</strong> the disruption <strong>of</strong> the native environment• strict guidelines to be metPelicans <strong>and</strong> cormorants can be significant predators <strong>of</strong> carp, however, only smaller(more manageable) sizes <strong>of</strong> carp are preyed upon. It is possible that foxes may preyon the larger sizes <strong>of</strong> carp. However, it is unknown how effectively naturalpredators control carp.The use <strong>of</strong> viral agents for biological control, such as the Spring Viraemia CarpVirus (SVCV) is considered to be unreliable for technical, commercial,conservation <strong>and</strong> logistic reasons <strong>and</strong> some sectors <strong>of</strong> the public have expressedconcerns about the use <strong>of</strong> viral control agents.Potential molecular approaches include immuno-contraception to reduce carpfertility <strong>and</strong> the introduction <strong>of</strong> a fatality gene into the carp population which canthen be triggered chemically or by some other means. However, there are currentlyno biological or contraceptive control agents suitable for use against carp, <strong>and</strong> genetechnology is not yet at a stage where it can be used for carp control. Thereforecarp management in the immediate future will rely on environmental rehabilitation,physical removal, poisoning where appropriate, <strong>and</strong> most importantly, reducingtheir spread.23.5.8 Prevention <strong>of</strong> re-infestation <strong>of</strong> <strong>irrigation</strong> systemMost <strong>irrigation</strong> systems control inflow <strong>and</strong> outflow <strong>of</strong> water through structures.Therefore the potential exists to modify these structures to restrict the movement <strong>of</strong>carp. Currently there is a lack <strong>of</strong> information about carp movement patterns thatwould enable the viability <strong>of</strong> modifications to inflow/outflow structures for carpmanagement to be determined.Fish barriers have potential as cost-effective, environmentally friendly methods <strong>of</strong>carp management.23.5.8.1 Mesh BarriersWire Mesh barriers have been successfully used to prevent carp from migratinginto <strong>irrigation</strong> systems from lakes <strong>and</strong> rivers.The disadvantages <strong>of</strong> this method are:• Debris will be trapped at the mesh barriers which would then require cleaning<strong>and</strong> monitoring.• Fish eggs can travel through wire mesh screens. Larger fish can be eliminatedonly until eggs hatch <strong>and</strong> develop into mature fish.• Flood flows can overtop structures re-introducing new populations <strong>of</strong> carp.Further options to improve screen design could be investigated.Construction <strong>and</strong> Refurbishment <strong>of</strong> Earthen Channel Banks August 2002 - Edition 1.0 23-23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!