10.07.2015 Views

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Role <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic and natural disturbance in1establishment (0–5)Soil disturbances by animals, vehicles, and natural erosionprovide suitable open areas <strong>for</strong> germination and establishment <strong>of</strong>this species (Densmore et al. 2000, Sagar and Harper 1964). Thisplant usually does not persist without redisturbance. In <strong>Alaska</strong>it is found primarily on sites disturbed within the last 10 years(Densmore et al. 2001, AKEPIC 2004).Current global distribution (0–5) 5This taxon is generally believed to originate in Europe, but it isnow cosmopolitan in distribution. Range <strong>of</strong> distribution includesarctic regions. (Dempster 1993, Hultén 1968, Sagar and Harper1964, Whitson et al. 2000).Extent <strong>of</strong> the species U.S. range and/or occurrence <strong>of</strong>5<strong>for</strong>mal state or provincial listing (0–5)Common plantain has been recorded from all states <strong>of</strong> theUnited States. It is listed as an invasive weed in Connecticut,Washington, Manitoba, and Quebec (USDA 2002). Plantagospecies are restricted noxious weeds in <strong>Alaska</strong> (<strong>Alaska</strong>Administrative Code 1987).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Amplitude and Distribution 16/25Feasibility <strong>of</strong> ControlScoreSeed banks (0–3) 3Seeds buried in the soil remained viable <strong>for</strong> 3.5 years in Michigan(Duvel 1904). Chippendale and Milton’s (1934) results suggestthat viability is maintained <strong>for</strong> 50–60 years.Vegetative regeneration (0–3) 2Common plantain has the ability to resprout from the crown,roots, or root fragments (Densmore et al. 2001, Rutledge andMcLendon 1996).Level <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t required (0–4) 2This species does not persist without repeated anthropogenicdisturbance. However, multiple weeding treatments may benecessary to eliminate plants germinating from buried seeds androot fragments. It is easily controlled by herbicides (Densmore etal. 2001, Rutledge and McLendon 1996).Total <strong>for</strong> Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 7/10Total score <strong>for</strong> 4 sections 44/100§Poa annua L.<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesYesPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 40 8Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 25 13Amplitude and Distribution 25 18Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 10 7Relative Maximum 46Climatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?CLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes –Arctic Alpine Yes –Poa annua has been collected from all ecogiographic regions in<strong>Alaska</strong> (Hultén 1968).Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 1Annual bluegrass is a pioneer species that is <strong>of</strong>ten dominant andmay hinder colonization by native species by reducing availablenutrients in the soil surface (Bergelson 1990).Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 3Annual bluegrass may <strong>for</strong>m dense mats and dominate, reducingthe vigor <strong>of</strong> other plants (Hutchinson and Seymour 1982). Fieldexperiments suggested that native seed germination and seedlingsurvival is reduced in the presence <strong>of</strong> annual bluegrass litterImpact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 1Litter <strong>of</strong> annual bluegrass may inhibit other species germinationreducing the number <strong>of</strong> individuals in the community (Bergelson1990).common names: annual bluegrassImpact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10) 3The seeds <strong>of</strong> annual bluegrass are eaten by various species <strong>of</strong>bird. The plants are probably eaten by deer. A wide range <strong>of</strong>invertebrates feed on annual bluegrass. It <strong>for</strong>ms hybrids withP. glauca and P. pratensis in Britain. (Hutchinson and Seymour1982). Annual bluegrass is an alternate host <strong>for</strong> number <strong>of</strong> viruses(Royer and Dickinson 1999).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 8/40Biological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 3Annual bluegrass reproduces primarily by seed, which isproduced rapidly in the season. Seed production rate may exceed20,000 in a season under ideal conditions (Hutchinson andSeymour 1982, Rutledge and McLendon 1996).Long-distance dispersal (0–3) 2The seeds have no special adaptation <strong>for</strong> long-distance dispersal,but are likely dispersed by rain, wind, and birds. Seeds remainviable after passing through the digestive tracts <strong>of</strong> some animalssuch as cows, horses, and deer (Hutchinson and Seymour 1982,Rutledge and McLendon 1996).Spread by humans (0–3) 3Seeds can be carried in mud on boots and vehicles. It iscommonly transported as an impurity <strong>of</strong> lawn grass seed(Hodkinson and Thompson 1997, Hutchinson and Seymour1982, Rutledge and McLendon 1996, Whitson et al. 2000).Allelopathic (0–2) 0Annual bluegrass is not allelophathic (USDA 2002).B-95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!