Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition between Lolium perenne and Poa trivialis during establishment. Grass andForage Science; 34: 27-36.Hakansson, S. and B. Wallgren. 1972. Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. II. Reproduction, plantdevelopment and response to mechanical disturbance. Swedish Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research 2: 3-14.Hall, I.V. 1955. Floristic changes following the cutting and burning <strong>of</strong> a woodlot <strong>for</strong> blueberry production.Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Science 35: 143-152.Haller, W.T., D.L. Sutton, and W.C. Barlowe. 1974. Effect <strong>of</strong> salinity on growth <strong>of</strong> several aquatic macrophytes.Ecology 55: 891-894.Haller, W.T. and D.L. Sutton. 1975. Community structure and competition between Hydrilla and Vallisneria.Hyacinth Control Journal 13: 48-50.Halloran, G.M. and A.L. Pennell. 1981. Regenerative potential <strong>of</strong> barley grass (Hordeum leporinum). TheJournal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology 18(3): 805-813.Hamrick, J.L. and J.M. Lee. 1987. Effect <strong>of</strong> soil surface topography and litter cover on the germination, survival,and grow <strong>of</strong> musk thistle (Carduus nutans). American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 74(3): 451-457.Harker, K.N., V.S. Baron, D.S. Chanasyk, and F.C. Stevenson. 2000. Grazing intensity effects on weedpopulations in annual and perennial pasture systems. Weed Science 48: 231-238.Harmon, G.W. and F.D. Keim. 1934. The percentage and viability <strong>of</strong> weed seeds recovered in the feces <strong>of</strong> farmanimals and their longevity when buried in manure. Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy 26: 762-767.Harper, J.L. 1957. Ranunculus acris L. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 45(1): 289-342.Harper, J.L. and W.A. Wood. 1957. Biological flora <strong>of</strong> the British Isles: Senecio jacobaea L. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology.45: 617-637.Harris, S.A. 2000. Digitalis purpurea L. In: Invasive plants <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s wildlands. Edited by Bossard, C.C.,J.M. Randall, and M.C. Hoshovsky. University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press. p. 158-161.Harris, S.A. 2000. Senecio jacobaea L. In: Invasive plants <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s wildlands. Edited by Bossard, C.C.,J.M. Randall, and M.C. Hoshovsky. University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press. p. 291-295.Harris, P. and A. McClay. 2003. Scentless chamomile. Tripleurospermum inodorum (L.) Sch. Bip. In: Classicalbiological control <strong>of</strong> weeds. Biology <strong>of</strong> target weeds. Available: http://res2.agr.ca/lethbridge/weedbio/plant/bchamom_e.htm [October 12, 2004].Harrison, H.F., Jr. and J.K. Peterson. 1997. Inhibitory effects <strong>of</strong> corn spurry (Spergula arvensis L.) on cole cropsand English pea. Allelopathy Journal 4: 283-290.Harrison, P.G. 1979. Reproductive strategies in intertidal populations <strong>of</strong> two co-occurring seagrasses (Zosteraspp.). Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 57: 2635-2638.Harrison, P.G. 1982. Seasonal and year-to-year variations in mixed intertidal populations <strong>of</strong> Zostera japonicaAschres. & Graebn. and Ruppia maritima L. S.L. Aquatic Botany 14: 357-371.Harrison, P.G. 1987. Natural expansion and experimental manipulation <strong>of</strong> seagrass (Zostera spp.) abundanceand the response <strong>of</strong> infaunal invertebrates. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 24(6): 799-812.Harrison, P.G. and R. Bigley. 1982. The recent introduction <strong>of</strong> the seagrass Zostera japonica Aschers. andGraebn. to the Pacific coast <strong>of</strong> North America. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39(12):1642-1648.Hartman, R.L. 1993. Gypsophila Baby’s-breath. In Hickman, J. C. (ed.) The Jepson Manual: Higher <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. p. 481.Hayden, A. 1934. Distribution and reproduction <strong>of</strong> Canada thistle in Iowa. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 21:355-373.B-156
Hearnden, M.N. and B.H. Kay. 1997. Importance <strong>of</strong> Hydrilla verticillata (Hydrocharitaceae) as habitat <strong>for</strong>immature mosquitoes at the Ross River Reservoir, Australia. Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Mosquito ControlAssociation 13: 164-170.Heathcote, G.D. and W.J. By<strong>for</strong>d. 1975. Surveys <strong>of</strong> sugar-beet seed crops, mangold clamps and weeds inEngland <strong>for</strong> aphids and viruses, 1963-73. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Science 84: 87-95.Heffernan, K.E., P.P. Coulling, J.E. Townsend, and C.J. Hutto. 2001. <strong>Ranking</strong> Invasive Exotic Plant Species inVirginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 01-13. Virginia Department <strong>of</strong> Conservation and Recreation,Division <strong>of</strong> Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. 27pp. plus appendices.Heidel, B. 1987. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Carduus nutans Musk thistle. The Nature Conservancy.Arlington, Virginia. Available: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/allipeti.html [2005, May 2].Heidorn, R. 1991. Vegetation management guideline: purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). Natural AreasJournal. 11(3): 172-173.Heiligmann, R.B. 2006. Controlling undesirable trees, shrubs, and vines in your woodland. Ohio StateUniversity Extension Fact Sheet. School <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources. Available: http://ohioline.osu.edu.Heutte, T. Botanist, USDA Forest Service. Ketchikan-Misty Fiords and Wrangell Ranger Districts, 648Mission Street, Ketchikan, <strong>Alaska</strong> 99901. Tel: (907) 228-4132 – Pers. obs.Heys, J., Exotic Plant Management Program Coordinator, National Park Service, <strong>Alaska</strong> Region - BiologicalResources Team, 240 W. 5th Ave, #114, Anchorage, AK 99501 tel: (907)644-3451, fax: 644-3809 – pers.obs.Hill, K.A., R.P.C. Townsend, M.J. Hill, and J.G. Hampton. 1999. Weed seeds in white clover seed lots: lossesduring seed cleaning. Agronomy Society <strong>of</strong> New Zealand. Proceedings annual conference 29: 27-30.Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora <strong>of</strong> the Pacific Northwest. An illustrated manual. University <strong>of</strong>Washington Press, Seattle and London. P. 623.Hodkinson, D. and K. Thompson. 1997. Plant dispersal: the role <strong>of</strong> man. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology, 34: 1484-1496.H<strong>of</strong>fmann, M.H. 2001. The distribution <strong>of</strong> Senecio vulgaris: capacity <strong>of</strong> climatic range models <strong>for</strong> predictingadventitious ranges. Flora 196: 395-403.H<strong>of</strong>mann, M. and J. Isselstein. 2004. Effects <strong>of</strong> drought and competition by a ryegrass sward on the seedlinggrowth <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> grassland species. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy and Crop Science 190: 277-286.Hoppes, W.G. 1988. Seedfall pattern <strong>of</strong> several species <strong>of</strong> bird-dispersed plants in Illinois woodland. Ecolology.69(2): 320-329.Hoshovsky, M. 1986. Element Stewardship Abstract <strong>for</strong> Cytisus scoparius and Genista monspessilanus. ScotchBroom, French Broom. The Nature Conservancy. Arlington, VA.Hoshovsky, M.C. 1989. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Rubus discolor, (Rubus procerus) Himalayanblackberry. Arlington, Virginia: The Nature Conservancy. Available: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/rubudisc.html via the INTERNET. Accessed 2005 Feb 07.Hoshovsky, M.C. 2000. Rubus discolor Weihe & Nees. In: Bossard CC, Randall JM and Hoshovsky MC,editors. Invasive plants <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s wildlands. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>niaPress. p 277-281.Hoshovsky, M.C. 1986. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Verbascum thapsus Common mullein. The NatureConservancy, Arlington, Verginia.Houssard, C. and J. Escarre. 1991. The effects <strong>of</strong> seed weight on growth and competitive ability <strong>of</strong> Rumexacetosella from two successional old-fields. Oecologia 86(2): 236-242.Howald, A. 2000. Lepidium latifolium L. In: Bossard, C.C., J.M. Randall, M.C. Hoshovsky, editors. Invasiveplants <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s wildlands. Berkeley, CA: University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press: 222-227.B-157
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed