Trifolium hybridum L.<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesYesPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 40 22Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 25 12Amplitude and Distribution 25 18Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 10 5Relative Maximum 57Climatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?CLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes –Arctic Alpine Yes –Alsike clover has been collected in the south coastal, interiorboreal, and arctic alpine ecogeographic regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> (Hultén1968, UAM 2004).Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 7Alsike clover alters edaphic conditions due to nitrogen fixation(USDA 2002) and may retard natural succession (Rutledge andMcLendon 1996).Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 7Alsike clover establishes in an existing layer, increases the density<strong>of</strong> the layer, and reduces the cover <strong>of</strong> graminoids and low <strong>for</strong>bs(I. Lapina pers obs.).Impact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 5Alsike clover <strong>for</strong>ms dominant stands and may delay establishment<strong>of</strong> native species (Rutledge and McLendon 1996).Impact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10) 3Alsike clover is highly palatable to grazing animals (USDA 2002).This species serves as a host <strong>for</strong> multiple crop diseases (USDA,ARS 2004).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 22/40Biological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 1Alsike clover reproduces only by abundant seed (USDA, NRCS2001).Long-distance dispersal (0–3) 2Alsike clover has no innate adaptations <strong>for</strong> long-distancedispersal; however, it does appear to move long distancesoccasionally (I. Lapina pers. obs.).Spread by humans (0–3) 3It is a widely cultivated <strong>for</strong>age and cover crop. Additionally, it isseeded along roadsides and banks <strong>for</strong> erosion control in <strong>Alaska</strong>(Densmore et al. 2001, Kubanis 1982).Allelopathic (0–2) 0This species is not allelopathic (USDA 2002)Competitive Ability (0–3) 1Alsike clover is moderately competitive <strong>for</strong> limiting factors. Itpersists in disturbed areas even when overtopped and shaded bynative species (Densmore et al. 2001).Thicket-<strong>for</strong>ming/Smothering growth <strong>for</strong>m (0–2) 0The plant is 6–20 inches tall and usually does not shade othervegetation (Welsh 1974).common names: alsike cloverGermination requirements (0–3) 2The seeds <strong>of</strong> alsike clover do not germinate until the seed coat issufficiently scarified. They germinate readily when temperaturerises to 25 °C (Rutledge and McLendon 1996). Alsike clover cangerminate in vegetated areas (Densmore et al. 2001).Other invasive species in the genus (0–3) 3Trifolium repens L. T. angustifolium L., T. arvense L., T. aureumL., T. campestre Schreb., T. dubium Sibth., T. hirtum All., T.incarnatum L., T. pratense L., and T. subterraneum.Aquatic, wetland or riparian species (0–3) 0Alsike clover is a weed <strong>of</strong> lawns, roadsides, and disturbed sites(Hultén 1968).Total <strong>for</strong> Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 12/25Ecological Amplitude and Distribution ScoreHighly domesticated or a weed <strong>of</strong> agriculture (0–4) 4Alsike clover has been planted <strong>for</strong> lawns and revegetation ondisturbed areas (Kubanis 1982). It has <strong>of</strong>ten escaped fromcultivation (Hultén 1968, Welsh 1974).Known level <strong>of</strong> impact in natural areas (0–6) 1Alsike clover is found only on disturbed sites in <strong>Alaska</strong>(Densmore et al. 2001). In Colorado it is found in degradednative habitats, disturbed in the last 11–50 years (Rutledge andMcLendon 1996).Role <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic and natural disturbance inestablishment (0–5)In <strong>Alaska</strong> alsike clover is observed only in disturbed sites(Densmore et al. 2001). It has been found in areas with naturaldisturbances, such as terraces and banks along glacial rivers andstreams (M. Shephard pers. obs.).Current global distribution (0–5) 5Alsike clover is native to Europe, Western Asia, and northernAfrica. It has been introduced and naturalized throughout thetemperate and subarctic regions <strong>of</strong> both hemispheres (Hultén1968).Extent <strong>of</strong> the species U.S. range and/or occurrence <strong>of</strong><strong>for</strong>mal state or provincial listing (0–5)Alsike clover is known from all continental states, except Texas(USDA 2002).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Amplitude and Distribution 18/23Feasibility <strong>of</strong> ControlScoreSeed banks (0–3) 2Some seeds <strong>of</strong> alsike clover are viable after 3 years <strong>of</strong> burial in thesoil (Rutledge and McLendon 1996).Vegetative regeneration (0–3) 0Alsike clover has no resprouting ability (USDA 2002).Level <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t required (0–4) 3Eradication <strong>of</strong> alsike clover is nearly impossible from sites(Densmore et al. 2002). However, it is quite sensitive to herbicidesand seed viability is not particularly long (J. Conn pers. obs.).Total <strong>for</strong> Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 5/10Total score <strong>for</strong> 4 sections 57/100§35B-132
Trifolium pratense L.<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesYesPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 40 16Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 25 12Amplitude and Distribution 25 16Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 10 7Relative Maximum 53Climatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?CLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes –Arctic Alpine No YesTrifolium pratense is documented in the south coastal and interiorboreal ecogeographic regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> (Hultén 1968, Welsh1974, AKEPIC 2005, UAM 2004). The CLIMEX matchingprogram indicates the climatic similarity between the arcticalpine ecogeographic region <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> and areas <strong>of</strong> native range<strong>of</strong> Trifolium pratense are moderately high. The range <strong>of</strong> red cloverincludes Røros and Dombås, Norway (Markenschlager 1934,Lid and Lid 1994), which have a 76% and 63% climatic matchwith Nome. Thus establishment <strong>of</strong> red clover in the arctic alpineecogeographic region is likely.Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 5Red clover increases soil nitrogen levels by fixing atmosphericnitrogen (USDA, NRCS 2006). The alteration <strong>of</strong> soil conditionsmay delay establishment <strong>of</strong> native species (Rutledge andMcLendon 1996) and facilitate colonization by other exotic plantspecies.Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 3Red clover is capable <strong>of</strong> creating very dense stands (Gettle et al.1996a). It produces a large biomass (Gettle et al. 1996b, H<strong>of</strong>mannand Isselstein 2004), which influences the structure <strong>of</strong> the layer.Density <strong>of</strong> up to 632 stems per m² was recorded in field study(Gettle et al. 1996a).Impact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 3Red clover reduces the number <strong>of</strong> individuals <strong>of</strong> native species inthe community (Gettle et al. 1996a). Density <strong>of</strong> grasses decreasedas density <strong>of</strong> established red clover increased in switchgrasscommunities (Gettle et al. 1996a).Impact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10) 5Moose and mule deer graze on red clover in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Theleaves <strong>of</strong> red clover are also eaten by beaver, woodchuck, muskrat,meadow mice, and sharp-tailed grouse. Seeds are eaten by crow,horned lark, and ruffed and sharp-tailed grouse. Red clover isvisited by bumblebees and sometimes by introduced honeybees(Graham 1941).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 16/40Biological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 1Red clover reproduces by seeds. It can produce moderate amount<strong>of</strong> seeds (11–1,000) (Densomore et al. 2001).common names: red cloverLong-distance dispersal (0–3)USeeds <strong>of</strong> red clover are large and do not have a specific adaptation<strong>for</strong> long-distance dispersal.Spread by humans (0–3) 2Red clover escaped cultivation (Rutledge and McLendon 1996,Welsh 1974). The seeds <strong>of</strong> red clover are commercially available.It has been planted <strong>for</strong> trials in <strong>Alaska</strong> (Panciera et al. 1990,Sparrow et al. 1993).Allelopathic (0–2) 0Red clover is not allelopathic (USDA, NRCS 2006).Competitive Ability (0–3) 3Red clover is capable <strong>of</strong> outcompeting exotic and native grasses(Gettle et al. 1996a, H<strong>of</strong>mann and Isselstein 2004). Red cloverhas the ability to fix nitrogen (USDA, NRCS 2006). The highestablishment success <strong>of</strong> red clover seedlings in existing swardswas obtained in field experiments (see Gettle et al. 1996a).Resources <strong>of</strong> the large seeds apparently allow seedlings to surviveperiods <strong>of</strong> establishment in deep shade <strong>of</strong> existing vegetation(H<strong>of</strong>mann and Isselstein 2004). Once red clover has establishedit competes with neighboring grasses (Gettle et al. 1996a).Thicket-<strong>for</strong>ming/Smothering growth <strong>for</strong>m (0–2) 0In seeded fields red clover can reach a density <strong>of</strong> 632 plants perm² (Gettle et al. 1996a). Red clover has not been observed at highdensities in noncultivated sites in <strong>Alaska</strong> (I. Lapina pers. obs.).Germination requirements (0–3) 3Red clover can germinate and establish in existing swards(Gettle et al. 1996b, H<strong>of</strong>mann and Isselstein 2004); however,mechanical disturbances that provide gaps in existing vegetationcreate favorable conditions <strong>for</strong> the establishment <strong>of</strong> red clover(H<strong>of</strong>mann and Isselstein 2004).Other invasive species in the genus (0–3) 3Trifolium arvense L., T. campestre Schreb., T. incarnatum L., andT. repens L. (USDA, NRCS 2006).Aquatic, wetland or riparian species (0–3) 0Red clover is <strong>of</strong>ten planted as a <strong>for</strong>age crop, it escapes andestablishes on roadsides, clearcuts, lawns, gardens, and meadows(Rutledge and McLendon 1996, Welsh 1974).Total <strong>for</strong> Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 12/23Ecological Amplitude and Distribution ScoreHighly domesticated or a weed <strong>of</strong> agriculture (0–4) 4Red clover is widely planted as a component <strong>of</strong> pasture and <strong>for</strong>agemixes. It is recommended <strong>for</strong> soil improvement. Several varietieshave been developed (USDA, NRCS 2006). It was first cultivatedin northern Europe around 1650 (Merkenschlager 1934).Known level <strong>of</strong> impact in natural areas (0–6) 1Red clover does not appear to have a perceivable impact onhabitats within Rocky Mountain National Park (Rutledge andMcLendon 1996).Role <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic and natural disturbance in3establishment (0–5)If seeded, red clover can successfully establish in pastures(Gettle et al. 1996a, b). Soil disturbances, cutting or grazing<strong>of</strong> competitive vegetation increases the rate <strong>of</strong> establishment(Guretzky et al. 2004, H<strong>of</strong>mann and Isselstein 2004). It hasbeen found in sites disturbed in the last 11–50 years in RockyMountain National Park (Rutledge and McLendon 1996). Itis found in Wrangell–St. Elias National Park in sites disturbedwithin the last 10 years (Densmore et al. 2001).B-133
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119: Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121: Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125: Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131: Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133: Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135: Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137: Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139: Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219:
2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220:
4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed