Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 1998. Caryophyllaceae. In: Douglas, G.W., G.B. Straley, D. Meidinger, andJ. Pojar. Illustrated flora <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. V. 2. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment, Lands and Parks Ministry <strong>of</strong>Forests. British Columbia. 401 pp.Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. Polygonaceae. In: Douglas, G. W., D. Meidinger and J. Pojar. 1999.Illustrated flora <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. V. 4. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment, Lands and Parks Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests.British Columbia. Pp. 60-102.Duebbert, H.F., E.T. Jacobson, K.F. Higgins, and E.B. Podoll. Establishment <strong>of</strong> seeded grasslands <strong>for</strong> wildlifehabitat in the prairie pothole region. Special Scientific Report – Wildlife No. 234. Washington, D.C.: U.S.Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service; 1981. 21 p.Duke, J.A. 1983. Handbook <strong>of</strong> energy crops. Unpublished. Available: Center <strong>for</strong> New Crops and <strong>Plants</strong>Products. Purdue University. Department <strong>of</strong> Horticulture and Landscape Architecture. West Lafayette, IN.http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/default.html [June 8, 2004].Dunn, P.H. 1985. Origin <strong>of</strong> leafy spurge in North America. Weed Science Society <strong>of</strong> America. 3:7-13.Duvel, J.W.T. 1904. Preservation <strong>of</strong> seed buried in the soil. Botanical Gazette 37(2): 146-147.Eckardt, N. 1987. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Melilotus alba – sweetclover or white sweetclover, Melilotus<strong>of</strong>ficinalis – yellow sweetclover. The Nature Conservancy, Minneapolis. 10 pp.Edwards, D.I. and D.P. Taylor. 1963. Host range <strong>of</strong> an Illinois population <strong>of</strong> the stem nematode (Ditylenchusdipsaci) isolated from onion. Nematologica 9: 305-312.Elakovich, S.D. and J.W. Wooten. 1989. Allelopathic potential <strong>of</strong> sixteen aquatic and wetland plants. Journal <strong>of</strong>Aquatic Plant Management 27: 78-84.Elliott, C.L., J.D. McKendrick, and D. Helm. 1987. Plant biomass, cover, and survival <strong>of</strong> species used <strong>for</strong>stripmine reclamation in south-central <strong>Alaska</strong>, U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research. 19(4):572-577.Elliott, F.C. 1949. Bromus inermis and B. pumpellianus in North America. Evolution 3(2):142-149.Elmore, C.L. and D.W. Cudney. 2003. Field bindweed. Integrated pest management <strong>for</strong> home gardenersand landscape pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. Pest notes. Davis (CA): University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Agriculture and NaturalResources. Publication nr 7462. 4 p.Else, M.J. and D.N. Riemer. 1984. Factors affecting germination <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> fragrant waterlily (Nymphaeaodorata). Journal <strong>of</strong> Aquatic Plant Management 22: 22-25.Endress, B.A. and C.G. Parks. 2004. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Potentilla recta L. Sulfur cinquefoil. TheNature Conservancy. Arlington, Virginia.Ennos, R.A. 1981. Detection <strong>of</strong> selection in populations <strong>of</strong> white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Biological Journal<strong>of</strong> the Linnean Society 15:75-82.Erneberg, M. 1999. Effects <strong>of</strong> herbivory and competition on an introduced plant in decline. Oecologia 118:203-209.Ertter, B. 1993. Rubus. In: Hickman JC, editor. The Jepson manual. Higher plants <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Berlekey, LosAngeles, London: University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press. p 974-975.Escarre, J. and J.D. Thompson. 1991. The effects <strong>of</strong> successional habitat variation and time <strong>of</strong> flowering on seedproduction in Rumex acetosella. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 79(4): 1099-1112.Esser, L.L. 1993. Phleum pratense. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, [Online]. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [November 5, 2004].Esser, L.L. 1993. Taraxacum <strong>of</strong>ficinale. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, (Online). U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/B-152
Estes, J.R., W.A. Sheaffer and E.P. Hall. 1990. Study I. Fisheries studies <strong>of</strong> the Orange Lake chain <strong>of</strong> Lakes.Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Completion Report as Required by Federal Aid inSport Fish Restoration Wallop-Breaux Project F-55-R Lower Ocklawaha Basin Fisheries Investigations,Tallahassee, Florida. 86 pp.Evans, J.E. 1984. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense): A literature review <strong>of</strong> management practices. Natural AreasJournal 4:11-21.Evans, L.T. 1953. The ecology <strong>of</strong> the halophytic vegetation at Lake Ellesmere, New Zealand. The Journal <strong>of</strong>Ecology. 41(1): 106-122.Evershed, A.F.C.-H. and C. Warburton. 1918. Pheasants and agriculture. The Journal <strong>of</strong> agricultural science 9:63-91.Faarlund, and Sunding. 1992. Illustrated Flora <strong>of</strong> Norway and Northern Europe. Domino Books, Ltd., Jersey.Pp. 544.Fabricius, L.J. and J.D. Nalewaja. 1968. Competition between wheat and wild buckwheat. Weed Science 16:204-208.Facelli, J.M., E. D’Angela, R.J.C. Leon. 1987. Diversity changes during pioneer stages in subhumid pampeangrassland succession. American Midland Naturalist. 117(1): 17-25.Fenner, M. 1978a. Susceptibility to shade in seedlings <strong>of</strong> colonizing and closed turf species. New Phytologist81: 739-744.Fenner, M. 1978b. A comparison <strong>of</strong> the abilities <strong>of</strong> colonizers and closed-turf species to establish from seed inartificial swards. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 66: 953-963.Fiedler, P.L. and R.A. Leidy. 1987. Plant communities <strong>of</strong> Ring Mountain Preserve, Marin County, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia.Madroño 34(3): 173-192.Firbank, L. and S. Smart. 2002. The changing status <strong>of</strong> arable plants that are important food items <strong>for</strong> farmlandbirds. Aspects <strong>of</strong> Applied Biology 67: 165-170.Flora Europaea. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Available: http://www.rbge.org.uk/rbge/web/index.jsp.[June 28, 2004].Flora <strong>of</strong> North America Editorial Committee, eds. 1993+. Flora <strong>of</strong> North America North <strong>of</strong> Mexico. 7+ vols.New York and Ox<strong>for</strong>d.Floridata. 2002. Digitalis purpurea. Available: http://floridata.com/ref/d/digi_pur.cfm [November 11, 2004].Fonda, R.W. 1974. Forest succession in relation to river terrace development in Olympic National Park,Washington. Ecology 55(5): 927-942.Forage In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>. 2004. Timothy (Phleum pratense L.). Available: http://<strong>for</strong>ages.oregonstate.edu[November 4, 2004].Forages. Topics: Species and Forage Variety Trials. Timothy. 2004. Available: http://www.<strong>for</strong>ages.psu.edu[Mart 2, 2004].Forcella, F. and H. Wood. 1986. Demography and control <strong>of</strong> Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. In relation to grazing.Weed Research 26:199-206.Forsberg, D.E. and K.F. Best. 1964. The emergence and plant development <strong>of</strong> wild buckwheat (Polygonumconvolvulus). Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Science 44: 100-103.Foulds, W. 1978. Response to soil moisture supply in three leguminous species. I. Growth, reproduction, andmortality. New Phytologist, 80: 535-545.Fowler, H.G. 1983. Individual specializations on nectarines <strong>of</strong> Euphorbia esula by Formica pallidefulva workers.Sociobiology 8: 99-103.B-153
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139: Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed