Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas and M.G. Maw. 1980. The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian weeds. 39. Euphorbia esulaL. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Science; 60: 651-663.Biesboer, D.D. 1996. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Euphorbia esula Leafy spurge. The Nature Conservancy,Arlington, Virginia.Bixby, M. D. 2004. Wetland Vegetation at Shea Park. On-line document. Available: http://www.bixby.org/parkside/multimedia/vegetation/ [January 12, 2005].Blackshaw, R.E. and L.M. Rode. 1991. Effect <strong>of</strong> ensiling and rumen digestion by cattle on weed seed viability.Weed Science39: 104-108.Blank, R.R. and J.A. Young. 2002. Influence <strong>of</strong> the exotic invasive crucifer, Lepidium latifolium, 0 on soilproperties and elemental cycling. Soil Science 167(12): 821-829.Blank, R.R. and J.A. Young. 2004. Influence <strong>of</strong> three weed species on soil nutrient dynamics. Soil Science169(5): 385-397.Bloom, C. T., C. C. Baskin, and J. M. Baskin. 1990. Germination ecology <strong>of</strong> the facultative biennial Arabislaevigata var. laevigata. American Midland NaturalistBlossey, B. 2003. Garlic Mustard. Ecology and management <strong>of</strong> invasive plants program http://www.invasiveplants.net/plants/garlicmustard.htmBlossey, B., V.A. Nuzzo, H.L. Hinz, E. Gerber. 2002. Garlic mustard. In Van Driesche, R., et al. 2002. Biologicalcontrol <strong>of</strong> invasive plants in the Eastern United States, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04.413 pp.Blossey, B. 2002. Purple Loosestrife. In: Driesche, R.V. et. al. 2002. Biological Control <strong>of</strong> Invasive <strong>Plants</strong> in theEastern United States. USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04, 413 pp.Boggs, K.W. Plant Ecologist, <strong>Alaska</strong> Natural Heritage Program, University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> Anchorage, 707 A Street,Anchorage, <strong>Alaska</strong> 99501 Tel: (907) 257-2783 Pers. comm.Bole, J.B. and J.R. Allan. 1978. Uptake <strong>of</strong> phosphorus from sediment by aquatic plants, Myriophyllum spicatumand Hydrilla verticillata. Water research 12: 353-358.Bonis, A. P.J. Grubb and D.A. Coomes. 1997. Requirements <strong>of</strong> gap-demanding species in chalk grassland:reduction <strong>of</strong> root competition versus nutrient-enrichment by animals. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 85: 625-633.Bossard, C. and R. Lichti. Carduus pycnocephalus. In: Bossard C.C., J.M. Randsll, and M.C. Hoshovsky, editors.Invasive plants <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia wildlands. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press;2000. p 86-90.Bossard, C.C., J.M. Randall, M.C. Hoshovsky. 2000. Invasive plants <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s wildlands. University <strong>of</strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press. 360 pp.Bossard, C. 2004. Myriophyllum spicatum. In: Cal-IPC - Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Invasive Plant Council. Available: http://groups.ucanr.org/ceppc/ Berkeley, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia.Bostock, S.J. and R.A. Benton. 1979. The reproductive strategies <strong>of</strong> five perennial Compositae. The Journal <strong>of</strong>Ecology 67: 91-107.Bowes, G.G. 1982. Changes in the yield <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>age following the use <strong>of</strong> herbicides to control aspen poplar.Journal <strong>of</strong> Range Management. 35: 246-248.Brandsæter, L.O., A. Olsmo, A.M. Tronsmo and H. Fykse. 2002. Freezing resistance <strong>of</strong> winter annual andbiennial legumes at different developmental stages. Crop Science 42: 437-443.Brar, G.S., J.F. Gomez, B.L. McMichael, A.G. Matches and H.M. Taylor. 1991. Germination <strong>of</strong> twenty <strong>for</strong>agelegumes as influenced by temperature. Agronomy Journal 83: 173-175.Brenchley, W.E. and K. Warington. 1930. The weed seed population <strong>of</strong> arable soil: I. Numerical estimation <strong>of</strong>viable seeds and observations on their natural dormancy. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 18(2): 235-272.B-146
British-Trees. 2004. Unsworth Associates Ltd. http://www.british-trees.com/index.htm [May 19, 2004].Broad, P.D. 1952. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> weed seeds in samples submitted <strong>for</strong> testing by the O.S.T.S. Journal <strong>of</strong> theNational Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Botany 6: 275-286.Brooks, R.R. and H.M. Crooks. 1980. Studies on uptake <strong>of</strong> heavy metals by the Scandinavian ‘kisplanten’Lychnis alpina and Silene dioica. Plant and Soil 54: 491-496.Brothers, T.S. and A. Springarn. 1992. Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion <strong>of</strong> central Indiana oldgrowth<strong>for</strong>ests. Conservation Biology 6: 91-100.Broughton, D.A. and J.H. McAdam. 2002. The non-native vascular flora <strong>of</strong> the Falkland Island. BotanicalJournal <strong>of</strong> Scotland 54(2): 153-190.Brunner, H., R.V. Harris, and R.L. Amor. 1975. A note on the dispersal <strong>of</strong> seeds on blackberry (Rubus procerusP.J. Muell.) by foxes and emus. Weed Research 16: 171-173.Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management. 2004. Weed Management <strong>of</strong> Colorado. BLM National list <strong>of</strong> invasive weedspecies <strong>of</strong> concern. Colorado State Office. Available: http://www.co.blm.gov/index.htm [November 11,2004].Burnside, O.C., R.G. Wilson, S. Weisberg and K.G. Hubbard. 1996. Weed Science 44: 74-86.Burnside, O.C., R.G. Wilson, S. Weisberg, and K.G. Hubbard. 1996. Seed longevity <strong>of</strong> 41 weed species buried17 years in Eastern and Western Nebraska. Weed Science 44: 74-86.Bush, T., D. Ogle, L.St. John, M. Stannard and K.B. Jensen. 2005. Plant guide. Orchardgrass Dactylis glomerataL. USDA NRCS Pullman Plant Materials Center. Pullman, Washington.Butler, J.L. and D.R. Cogan. 2004. Leafy spurge effects on patterns <strong>of</strong> plant species richness. Journal <strong>of</strong> RangeManagement. 57: 305-311.Butterfield, C., J. Stubbendieck, and J. Stumpf. 1996. Species abstract <strong>of</strong> highly disruptive exotic plants.Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/exoticab/exoticab.htm (Version 16JUL97).Byers, D. L. 1988. Life history variation <strong>of</strong> Alliaria petiolata in a range <strong>of</strong> habitats in New Jersey. M. S. Thesis.Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. Pp. 132.Byers, D.L. and J.A. Quinn. 1987. The effect <strong>of</strong> habitat variation in Alliaria petiolata on life historycharacteristics. Abstracts. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 74:647.Byers, D.L. and J.A. Quinn. 1998. Demographic variation in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae) in four contrastinghabitats. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Torrey Botanical Society 125:138-149.CalEPPC Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Exotic Pest Plant Council. 1999. Exotic Plant Pest List (http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/5319/4898.pdf, October 19, 1999). Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Exotic Pest Plant Council. Cali<strong>for</strong>nia.Cal-IPC Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Invasive Plant Council. 2005. Brachypodium sylvaticum alert. Available: http://groups.ucanr.org/ceppc/ (February 2, 2005].Cal-IPC Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Invasive Plant Council. 2005. Dactylis glomerata. Plant Assessment Form. Available: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ [February 2, 2005].Cal-IPC Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Invasive Plant Council. 2005. Rumex acetosella Plant Assessment Form. Available: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ [February 2, 2005].Cal-IPC Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Invasive Plant Council. 2005. Rumex crispus. Plant Assessment Form. Available: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ [February 28, 2003].Calder, D.M. 1961. Plant ecology <strong>of</strong> subalpine shingle river-beds in Canterbury, New Zealand. The Journal <strong>of</strong>Ecology. 49(3): 581-594.Callihan, R.H. and T.W. Miller. 1999. Idaho’s Noxious Weeds. University <strong>of</strong> Idaho. http://www.oneplan.org/.B-147
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133: Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135: Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137: Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139: Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed