Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 1970. Weeds <strong>of</strong> Canada. Canada Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Canada. p. 112-113.Frick, B. 1984. The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian weeds. 62. Lappula squarrosa (Retz.) Dumort. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong>Plant Science 64: 375-386.Friesen, G. and L.H. Shebeski. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I.Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Science40:457-467.Frodge, J.D., D.A. Marino, G.B. Pauley and G.L. Thomas. 1995. Mortality <strong>of</strong> largemouth bass (Micropterussalmoides) and steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in densely vegetated littoral areas tested using in situbioassay. Lake and Reservoir Management 11 (2): 343-358.Froud-Williams, R.J. and R. Ferris. 1987. Germination <strong>of</strong> proximal and distal seeds <strong>of</strong> Poa trivialis L. fromcontrasting habitats. Weed Research; 27: 245-250.Funk, D.T. 2005. Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaerth. European alder. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, Stateand Private Forestry. Available: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/ via the INTERNET. Accessed 2005 March 3.Furbish, C.E. 2001. Exotic plant survey <strong>of</strong> the Chilkoot Trail Unit, Klondike Gold Rush National HistoricalPark. Natural Resources Management Program. 49 pp.Garnatje, T., R. Vilatersana, C.T. Roche, N. Garcia-Jacas, A. Susanna and D.C. Thill. 2002. Multipleintroductions from the Iberian peninsula are responsible <strong>for</strong> invasion <strong>of</strong> Crupina vulgaris in western NorthAmerica. New Phytologist 154: 419-428.Gasser, H. 1968. A growth analysis <strong>of</strong> Phleum pratense and <strong>of</strong> Dactylis glomerata grown in pure and mixed standsat two densities. Botanical Gazette. 129(4): 351-361.Gealy, D.R., F.L. Young, and L.A. Morrow. 1985. Germination <strong>of</strong> mayweed (Anthemis cotula) achenes and seed.Weed Science 33: 69-73.Gealy, D.R., S.A. Squier, and A.G. Ogg Jr. 1994. Soil environment and temperature affect germination andseedling growth <strong>of</strong> mayweed chamomile (Anthemis cotula). Weed Technology 8: 668-672.Gettle, R.M., J.R. George, K.M. Blanchet, D.R. Buxton and K.J. Moore. 1996a. Frost-seeding legumes intoestablished switchgrass: establishment, density, persistence, and sward composition. Agronomy Journal 88:98-103.Gettle, R.M., J.R. George, K.M. Blanchet, D.R. Buxton and K.J. Moore. 1996b. Frost-seeding legumes intoestablished switchgrass: <strong>for</strong>age yield and botanical composition <strong>of</strong> the stratified canopy. Agronomy Journal88: 555-560.Gibson, D.I. and A.D. Courtney. 1977. Effects <strong>of</strong> Poa trivialis, Stellaria media, and Rumex obtusifolius on thegrowth <strong>of</strong> Lolium perenne in the glasshouse. Annals <strong>of</strong> Applied Biology 86: 105-110.Gillham, M.E. 1956. Ecology <strong>of</strong> the Pembrokeshire Islands: V. Manuring by the colonial seabirds andmammals, with a note on seed distribution by gulls. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 44(2): 429-454.Gilman, E.F. and D.G. Watson. 1994. Sorbus aucuparia European Mountain-Ash. Fact Sheet ST-599,Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute <strong>of</strong> Food andAgricultural Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Florida.Gisler, M. Program manager/botanist. Institute <strong>for</strong> Applied Ecology, 227 SW 6th, Corvallis, Oregon 97333.tel. (541) 753-3099 – pers. comm.Glegg, L.M. and J. Grace. 1974. The distribution <strong>of</strong> Heracleum mantegazzianum (Somm. & Levier) nearEdinburgh. Transactions <strong>of</strong> Botanical Society <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh 42: 223-229.Glenn, D.M. and W.V. Welker. 1996. Sod competition in peach production: II. Establishment beneath maturetrees. Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Society <strong>for</strong> Horticultural Science; 121:670-675.B-154
Goltz, L. 1988. Honey and pollen plants. Part X. Miscellaneous honey plants. American Bee Journal 128: 97-100.Gooch, S.M.S. 1963. The occurrence <strong>of</strong> weed seeds in samples tested by the <strong>of</strong>ficial seed testing station, 1960-1.Journal <strong>of</strong> the National Institute <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Botany 9(3): 353-371.Graham, E.H. 1941. Legumes <strong>for</strong> erosion control and wildlife. Misc. Publ. 412. Washington, DC: U.S.Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. 153 p.Granström, A. 1987. Seed viability <strong>of</strong> fourteen species during five years <strong>of</strong> storage in a <strong>for</strong>est soil. Journal <strong>of</strong>Ecology, 75, p.321-331.Granström, A. and J. Schimmel. 1993. Heat effects on seeds and rhizomes <strong>of</strong> a selection <strong>of</strong> boreal <strong>for</strong>est plantsand potential reaction to fire. Oecologia 94: 307-313.Grant, E.A. and W.G. Sallens. 1964. Influence <strong>of</strong> plant extracts on germination and growth <strong>of</strong> eight <strong>for</strong>agespecies. J. Br. 18 Grass Soc. 19: 191-197.Green, H.E. 1937. Dispersal <strong>of</strong> Senecio jacobaea. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 25:569.Grieshop, M.J. and R.M. Nowierski. 2002. Selected factors affecting seedling recruitment <strong>of</strong> Dalmatiantoadflax. Journal <strong>of</strong> Range Management 55: 612-619.Grime, J.P., G. Mason, A.V. Curtis, J. Rodman, S.R. Band. 1981. A comparative study <strong>of</strong> germinationcharacteristics in a local flora. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 69(3): 1017-1059.Gross, K.L. 1980. Colonization by Verbascum thapsus (Mullein) <strong>of</strong> an old-field in Michigan: experiments on theeffects <strong>of</strong> vegetation. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 68(3): 919-927.Gross, K.L. 1984. Effect <strong>of</strong> seed size and growth <strong>for</strong>m on seedling establishment <strong>of</strong> six monocarpic perennialplants. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 72(2): 369-387.Gross, K.L. and P.A. Werner. 1978. The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian weeds. 28. Verbascum thapsus L. and V. blattaria L.Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Science. 58: 401-413.Gross, K.L. and P.A. Werner. 1982. Colonizing abilities <strong>of</strong> ‘biennial’ plant species in relation to ground cover:implications <strong>for</strong> their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology. 63(4): 921-931.Groves, R.H., M.P. Austin and P.E. Kaye. 2003. Competition between Australian native and introduced grassesalong a nutrient gradient. Austral Ecology 28: 491-498.Gubanov, I.A., K.B. Kiseleva, B.C. Novikov, and B.N. Tihomirov. 1995. Flora <strong>of</strong> vascular plants <strong>of</strong> CenterEuropean Russia. Moscow. Argus. 558 pp. In Russian. University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming. Laramie, Wyoming. 630 pp.Gubanov, I.A., K.V. Kiseleva, V.S. Novikov, and V.N. Tihomirov. An Illustrated identification book <strong>of</strong> the plants<strong>of</strong> Middle Russia, Vol. 2: Angiosperms (dicots: archichlamydeans). Moscow: Institute <strong>of</strong> TechnologicalResearch; 2003. 666 p.Gubanov, I.A., K.V. Kiseleva, V.S. Novikov, and V.N. Tihomirov. An illustrated identification book <strong>of</strong> theplants <strong>of</strong> Middle Russia, Vol. 1: Vascular cryptograms, gymnosperms, angiosperms (monocots). Moscow:Institute <strong>of</strong> Technological Researches; 2003. 526 p. In Russian.Guide to weeds in British Columbia. 2002. British Columbia, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Food and Fisheries,Open Learning Agency. Available: http://www.weedsbc.ca/resources.html [April 23, 2005].Gulmon, S.L. 1979. Competition and coexistence: three annual grass species. American Midland Naturalist.101(2): 403-416.Guretzky, J.A., K.J. Moore, A.D. Knapp, and E.C. Brummer. 2004. Emergence and survival <strong>of</strong> legumes seededinto pasture varying in landscape position. Crop Science 44: 227-233.Haferkamp et al. 1953. Studies on aged seeds. I. Relation <strong>of</strong> age <strong>of</strong> seed to germination and longevity.Agronomy Journal 45: 434-437.B-155
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed