MAFF - Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. Government <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. Pest Management.Aggressive ornamentals. Baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata). Available: http://www.agf.gov.bc.ca/cropprot/index.htm [January 19, 2005].MAFRI - Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. Weeds. Narrow-leaved hawk’s beard. Available:http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/index.shtml [13 April 2004].MAFRI - Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. 2004. Pest management – Weeds – Hemp-nettle.Available: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/index.shtml [June 14, 2004].MAFRI - Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. 2004. Weeds – Foxtail Barley. Available: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/weeds/index.html [November 8, 2004].MAFRI - Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. 2004. Crops, Alfalfa seed production. Available:http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/index.shtml [October 4, 2005].MAFRI - Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. 2004. Pest management – Weeds – Broad-leavedplantain. Available: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/index.shtml [February 10, 2004].MAFRI - Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. 2001. Common groundsel. http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/weeds/index.html [April 17, 2006].MAFRI - Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. 2004. Weeds, Insects & Diseases: Dandelion.Available: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/weeds/fab07s00.html [October 5, 2004].Maine Natural Areas Program. 2004. Japanese Knotweed fact sheet. On line document. http://www.state.me.us/doc/nrimc/mnap/factsheets/invasivesfact.htmlMalyschev, L.I., Peschkova, G.G, editors. Flora Sibiriae. T. 2. Poaceae (Gramineae). Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1990.359 p. In Russian.Malyugin, I.E. 1980. Promising speices <strong>of</strong> cherry <strong>for</strong> amenity planting in Donbass. Rastitel’nye Resursy 16:145-150. (In Russian).Manitoba Agriculture and Food. 2002. Pest Management – Weeds – Broad-leaved plantain. http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/weeds/fab60s00.htmlMann, H. 1991. Purple Loosestrife: a botanical dilemma. Osprey 22:67-77.Mann, H.H. 1939. The weed herbage <strong>of</strong> a slightly acid arable soil. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 27: 89-113.Mann, H.H. and T.W. Barnes. 1950. The competition between barley and certain weeds under controlledconditions. IV. Competition with Stellaria media. Annals <strong>of</strong> Applied Biology 37: 139-148.Maranion, T. and J.W. Bartoloome. 1993. Reciprocal transplants <strong>of</strong> herbaceous communities between Quercusagrifolia woodland and adjacent grassland. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 81(4): 673-682.Markenschlager, F. 1934. Migration and distribution <strong>of</strong> red clover in Europe. Herbage reviews 2: 88-92.Marriott, C.A., G.R. Bolton and J.M. Fisher. 2003. Changes in species composition <strong>of</strong> abandoned sown swardsafter imposing seasonal cutting treatments. Grass and Forage Science; 58: 37-49.Marshall, E.J.P., V.K. Brown, N.D. Boatman, P.J.W. Lutman, G.R. Squire and L.K. Ward. 2003. The role <strong>of</strong>weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Research 43: 77-89.Masters, R.A., B. Kappler. 2002. Noxious weeds <strong>of</strong> Nebraska: Leafy spurge. Nebraska: University <strong>of</strong> NebraskaCooperative Extension EC02-174-S. 10 p.Materne, M. 2000. Plant guide – Smooth cordgrass – Spartina alterniflora Loisel. USDA, NRCS, LouisianaState Office, Plant Materials, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Available: http://plants.usda.gov/ [December 13,2004].Matlack, G.R. and J.L. Harper. 1986. Spatial distribution and the per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> individual plants in a naturalpopulation <strong>of</strong> Silene dioica. Oecologia 70: 121-127.Matthews, L.J. 1972. Weed control, stinking mayweed. The New Zealand Journal <strong>of</strong> Agriculture 124 (2): 69.B-162
Mauer, T., M.J. Russo, M. Evans. 1987 Element Stewardship Abstract <strong>for</strong> Centaurea maculosa SpottedKnapweed. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.McClintock, E. 1993. Cotula. In Hickman, J. C. (ed.) The Jepson Manual: Higher <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. pp. 354-355.McClintock, E. 1993. Cytisus. In J. C. Hickman (ed.) The Jepson Manual <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia.University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press, Berkley. Pp. 1400.McCloskey, M., L.G. Firbank, A.R. Watkinson and D.J. Webb. 1996. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> experimental arableweed communities under different management practices. Journal <strong>of</strong> Vegetation Science 7: 799-808.McKee, C. Wildlife Biologist, USDI Geological Survey PO Box 74633 Fairbanks, AK 99707 tel: (907) 455-0636; fax (907) 455-0601.McKee, R. and A.F. Musil. 1948. Relation <strong>of</strong> temperature and moisture to longevity <strong>of</strong> seed <strong>of</strong> blue lupin,Lupinus angustifolium, Austrian winter fieldpea, Pissum arvense, and hairy vetch, Vicia villosa. AmericanJournal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy 40: 459-465.McKell, C.M., C. Duncan, and C.H. Muller. 1969. Competitive relationships <strong>of</strong> annual ryegrass (Loliummultiflorum Lam.). Ecology. 50(4): 653-657.McKone, M. J. 1985. Reproductive biology <strong>of</strong> several bromegrasses (Bromus): breeding system, pattern <strong>of</strong> fruitmaturation, and seed set. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 72(9): 1334-1339.McLean, A., T.M. Lord, A.J. Green. 1971. Utilization <strong>of</strong> the major plant communities in the SimilkameenValley, British Columbia. Journal <strong>of</strong> Range Management. 24: 346-142.McLean, A. and M.B. Clark. 1980. Grass, trees, and cattle on clearcut-logged areas. Journal <strong>of</strong> RangeManagement 33(3): 213-217.McNeill, J. 1980. The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian weeds. 46. Silene noctiflora L. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Science 60:1243-1253.McNeilly, T. 1981. Ecotypic differentiation in Poa annua: interpopulation differences in response tocompetition and cutting. New Phytologist/ 88(3): 539-547.McVean, D.N. 1953. Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaerth. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 41(2): 447-466.McVean, D.N. 1955. Ecology <strong>of</strong> Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaerth.: II. Seed distribution and germination. The Journal<strong>of</strong> Ecology 43(1): 61-71.Meijden, E. van der and R.R. van der Waals-kooi. 1979. The population ecology <strong>of</strong> Senecio jacobaea in theNetherlands sand dune system. I. Reproductive strategy and the biennial habit. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 67: 131-154.Merigliano, M.F. and P. Lesica. 1998. The native status <strong>of</strong> reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in theInland Northwest, USA. Natural Areas Journal 18(3):223-230.Mertens, S.K. and J. Hansen. 2002. Weed seed production, crop planting pattern, and mechanical weeding inwheat. Weed Science 50: 748-756.Messersmith, C.G., R.G. Lym, and D.S. Galitz. 1985. Biology <strong>of</strong> leafy spurge. Weed Science Society <strong>of</strong> America.3:42-56.Meyer, D.W. and M. Badaruddin. 2001. Frost tolerance <strong>of</strong> ten seedling legume species at four growth stages.Crop Science 41: 1838-1842.Miao, S.L., F.A. Bazzaz, R.B. Primack. 1991. Persistence <strong>of</strong> maternal nutrient effects in Plantago major: thethird generation. Ecology. 72(5): 1634-1642.Michigan State University Extension. 1999. Caragana arborescens – Siberian Peashrub. Ornamental <strong>Plants</strong> plusVersion 3.0 – 00000281 11/12/99. http://www.msue.msu.edu/imp/modzz/00000281.html. [June 8,2004].B-163
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147:
Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed