Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska
Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska
Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Extent <strong>of</strong> the species U.S. range and/or occurrence <strong>of</strong>5<strong>for</strong>mal state or provincial listing (0–5)It occurs in nearly all states <strong>of</strong> the United States (USDA 2002).It is listed as noxious in 15 American states and in 4 Canadianprovinces (Invaders Database <strong>System</strong> 2003, USDA 2002).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Amplitude and Distribution 21/25Feasibility <strong>of</strong> ControlScoreSeed banks (0–3) 3Seeds remain viable in the soil up to 5 years (Lym and Zollinger1992). After 8 years about 30% <strong>of</strong> seeds may be viable (Mauer etal. 1987).Vegetative regeneration (0–3) 2Lateral root-sprouting is possible <strong>for</strong> Centaurea biebersteinii(Carpinelli 2003, M. Shephard pers. com.).Level <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t required (0–4) 4Long-term control requires a combination <strong>of</strong> managementtechniques. Several years <strong>of</strong> monitoring are required to exhaustthe seed bank. Most knapweed control has been conducted inagricultural settings and little in<strong>for</strong>mation is available <strong>for</strong> the use<strong>of</strong> herbicides in native communities (Lym and Zollinger 1992,Rice et al. 1997). A number <strong>of</strong> biological control agents have beenmoderately successful in Montana and other western states (Storyet al. 1989, Story et al. 1991).Total <strong>for</strong> Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 9/10Total score <strong>for</strong> 4 sections 86/100§Cerastium fontanum common names: common mouse-ear chickweed,ssp. vulgare (Hartman) Greuter & Burdetbig chickweedCerastium glomeratum Thuill.,sticky chickweed<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesYesPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 40 6Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 25 8Amplitude and Distribution 19 15Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 10 5Relative Maximum 36Climatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?CLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes YesArctic Alpine No YesCerastium fontanum ssp. vulgare has been documented ininterior boreal and south coastal ecogeographic regions <strong>of</strong><strong>Alaska</strong> (AKEPIC 2005, Hultén 1968, UAM 2004, Welsh 1974).Cerastium glomeratum is known from many disjunct localitiesin south coastal, interior boreal and arctic alpine ecogeographicregions in <strong>Alaska</strong> and Yukon (Hultén 1968, UAM 2004, Welsh1974). Cerastium fontanum ssp. vulgare has a cosmopolitandistribution with introduction into a variety <strong>of</strong> climatic zonesincluding arctic and subarctic (Hultén 1968). Using the CLIMEXmatching program, the climatic similarity between Nome andother areas where the species is documented is fairly high. Therange <strong>of</strong> the species includes Chirka-Kem’, Arkhangel’sk, andZlatoust, Russia (Gubanov et al. 2003, Hultén 1968), which havea 77%, 76%, and 71% <strong>of</strong> climatic match with Nome respectively.This suggests that establishment <strong>of</strong> common mouse-earchickweed in <strong>Alaska</strong> arctic and alpine ecoregions may be possible.Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 1Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed do notappear to occur in high densities in natural areas in <strong>Alaska</strong>.The impact <strong>of</strong> these species on ecosystem processes is nearlynegligible (J. Conn pers. obs., M. Carlson pers. obs.).Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 3Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed likely alterthe density <strong>of</strong> the layer <strong>of</strong> vegetation (Ohio perennial and biennialweed guide 2006).Impact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 1On disturbed ground common mouse-ear chickweed and stickychickweed can <strong>for</strong>m a mat that excludes other plants (Ohioperennial and biennial weed guide 2006). However, these specieshave not been observed in undisturbed plant communitiesin <strong>Alaska</strong> (M. Carslon pers. obs.) and its impact on nativecommunity composition is not documented.Impact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10) 1Flowers <strong>of</strong> common mouse-ear chickweed are self-pollinated andrarely visited by insects (Mulligan 1972). Both species are host <strong>for</strong>some nematodes (Townshend and Davidson 1962).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 6/40Biological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 3Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed reproduceby seeds and stems rooting at the nodes (Ohio perennial andbiennial weed guide 2006).Long-distance dispersal (0–3) 2Seabirds probably have some role in transport <strong>of</strong> seeds. Viableseeds <strong>of</strong> Cerastium species were found in pellets <strong>of</strong> sea gulls(Gillham 1956).Spread by humans (0–3) 2Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed are weeds<strong>of</strong> gardens and lawns. Seeds can be transported with horticulturalstock (Hodkinson and Thompson 1997).Allelopathic (0–2) 0Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed are notknown to be allelopathic.B-18