10.07.2015 Views

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Extent <strong>of</strong> the species U.S. range and/or occurrence <strong>of</strong>5<strong>for</strong>mal state or provincial listing (0–5)It occurs in nearly all states <strong>of</strong> the United States (USDA 2002).It is listed as noxious in 15 American states and in 4 Canadianprovinces (Invaders Database <strong>System</strong> 2003, USDA 2002).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Amplitude and Distribution 21/25Feasibility <strong>of</strong> ControlScoreSeed banks (0–3) 3Seeds remain viable in the soil up to 5 years (Lym and Zollinger1992). After 8 years about 30% <strong>of</strong> seeds may be viable (Mauer etal. 1987).Vegetative regeneration (0–3) 2Lateral root-sprouting is possible <strong>for</strong> Centaurea biebersteinii(Carpinelli 2003, M. Shephard pers. com.).Level <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t required (0–4) 4Long-term control requires a combination <strong>of</strong> managementtechniques. Several years <strong>of</strong> monitoring are required to exhaustthe seed bank. Most knapweed control has been conducted inagricultural settings and little in<strong>for</strong>mation is available <strong>for</strong> the use<strong>of</strong> herbicides in native communities (Lym and Zollinger 1992,Rice et al. 1997). A number <strong>of</strong> biological control agents have beenmoderately successful in Montana and other western states (Storyet al. 1989, Story et al. 1991).Total <strong>for</strong> Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 9/10Total score <strong>for</strong> 4 sections 86/100§Cerastium fontanum common names: common mouse-ear chickweed,ssp. vulgare (Hartman) Greuter & Burdetbig chickweedCerastium glomeratum Thuill.,sticky chickweed<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesYesPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 40 6Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 25 8Amplitude and Distribution 19 15Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 10 5Relative Maximum 36Climatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?CLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes YesArctic Alpine No YesCerastium fontanum ssp. vulgare has been documented ininterior boreal and south coastal ecogeographic regions <strong>of</strong><strong>Alaska</strong> (AKEPIC 2005, Hultén 1968, UAM 2004, Welsh 1974).Cerastium glomeratum is known from many disjunct localitiesin south coastal, interior boreal and arctic alpine ecogeographicregions in <strong>Alaska</strong> and Yukon (Hultén 1968, UAM 2004, Welsh1974). Cerastium fontanum ssp. vulgare has a cosmopolitandistribution with introduction into a variety <strong>of</strong> climatic zonesincluding arctic and subarctic (Hultén 1968). Using the CLIMEXmatching program, the climatic similarity between Nome andother areas where the species is documented is fairly high. Therange <strong>of</strong> the species includes Chirka-Kem’, Arkhangel’sk, andZlatoust, Russia (Gubanov et al. 2003, Hultén 1968), which havea 77%, 76%, and 71% <strong>of</strong> climatic match with Nome respectively.This suggests that establishment <strong>of</strong> common mouse-earchickweed in <strong>Alaska</strong> arctic and alpine ecoregions may be possible.Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 1Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed do notappear to occur in high densities in natural areas in <strong>Alaska</strong>.The impact <strong>of</strong> these species on ecosystem processes is nearlynegligible (J. Conn pers. obs., M. Carlson pers. obs.).Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 3Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed likely alterthe density <strong>of</strong> the layer <strong>of</strong> vegetation (Ohio perennial and biennialweed guide 2006).Impact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 1On disturbed ground common mouse-ear chickweed and stickychickweed can <strong>for</strong>m a mat that excludes other plants (Ohioperennial and biennial weed guide 2006). However, these specieshave not been observed in undisturbed plant communitiesin <strong>Alaska</strong> (M. Carslon pers. obs.) and its impact on nativecommunity composition is not documented.Impact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10) 1Flowers <strong>of</strong> common mouse-ear chickweed are self-pollinated andrarely visited by insects (Mulligan 1972). Both species are host <strong>for</strong>some nematodes (Townshend and Davidson 1962).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 6/40Biological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 3Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed reproduceby seeds and stems rooting at the nodes (Ohio perennial andbiennial weed guide 2006).Long-distance dispersal (0–3) 2Seabirds probably have some role in transport <strong>of</strong> seeds. Viableseeds <strong>of</strong> Cerastium species were found in pellets <strong>of</strong> sea gulls(Gillham 1956).Spread by humans (0–3) 2Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed are weeds<strong>of</strong> gardens and lawns. Seeds can be transported with horticulturalstock (Hodkinson and Thompson 1997).Allelopathic (0–2) 0Common mouse-ear chickweed and sticky chickweed are notknown to be allelopathic.B-18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!