10.07.2015 Views

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

Invasiveness Ranking System for Non-Native Plants of Alaska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Feasibility <strong>of</strong> ControlScoreSeed banks (0–3) 2Seeds buried in soil and permanently submerged in water lostviability after 23 months (van der Toorn and ten Hove 1982).Vegetative regeneration (0–3) 2The species is documented as regenerating from pieces <strong>of</strong> stem(<strong>Plants</strong> <strong>for</strong> a future 2002).Level <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t required (0–4) 3Common brassbuttons can grow on very s<strong>of</strong>t, deep mud, makinginfestations nearly inaccessible by foot or boat. No herbicides areselective enough to be used in wetlands without the potential <strong>for</strong>injuring native species.Total <strong>for</strong> Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 7/10Total score <strong>for</strong> 4 sections 41/98§Crepis tectorum L.<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesYesPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 30 9Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 25 17Amplitude and Distribution 25 18Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 7 3Relative MaximumClimatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?CLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes –Arctic Alpine Yes –Crepis tectorum has been collected in south coastal [Seward,Skagway, Lake Clark, and Unalaska (UAM 2004)], interiorboreal [Anchorage and Fairbanks (Hultén 1968, UAM 2004),Wasilla (AKNHP 2003), and Denali National Park and Preserve(Densmore et al. 2001)], and arctic alpine [Dillingham (UAM2004)] ecoregions in <strong>Alaska</strong>. The range <strong>of</strong> the species includesDillingham, <strong>of</strong> the arctic alpine ecoregion (UAM 2004) whereit withstands winter temperatures to -53 °F and a mean <strong>of</strong> 140frost-free days (WRCC 2004). It is unclear if Crepis tectorum canestablish in arctic sites with shorter growing seasons (e.g., Nomehas similar extreme winter temperatures, but averages 30 fewerfrost-free days (WRCC 2004).Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 3Narrowleaf hawksbeard likely reduces water availability. It maydelay the establishment <strong>of</strong> native species on naturally disturbedsoil (J. Conn pers. com.) including following <strong>for</strong>est fires ininterior <strong>Alaska</strong> (K. Villano 2007).Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 3Narrowleaf hawksbeard has established along the Knik Riverwhere it changes the density <strong>of</strong> other species (M. Shephard pers.com.).Impact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 3Dense stands <strong>of</strong> narrowleaf hawksbeard in Denali National Parkand Healy have displaced native colonizers (R. Densmore pers.com.).Impact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10)UNo in<strong>for</strong>mation was found identifying impacts on higher trophiclevels.Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 9/30common names: narrowleaf hawksbeardBiological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 3Narrowleaf hawksbeard reproduces by seeds. Each plant iscapable <strong>of</strong> producing over 49,000 seeds (Royer and Dickinson1999).Long-distance dispersal (0–3) 3The small seeds have long pappus hairs that aid in wind dispersal(SAFRR 1984, Royer and Dickinson 1999).Spread by humans (0–3) 3Narrowleaf hawksbeard is <strong>of</strong>ten a contaminant in agriculturalseed (MAFRI 2004). It spreads along roadsides in <strong>Alaska</strong>(Densmore et al. 2001).Allelopathic (0–2) 0<strong>Non</strong>eCompetitive Ability (0–3) 3Narrowleaf hawksbeard competes with native species <strong>for</strong> soilmoisture (J. Snyder pers. com.). It competes successfully with haycrops (J. Conn pers. com.).Thicket-<strong>for</strong>ming/Smothering growth <strong>for</strong>m (0–2) 0Narrowleaf hawksbeard does not <strong>for</strong>m dense thickets (Lapinapers. obs.).Germination requirements (0–3) 1Narrowleaf hawksbeard has been observed germinating in areaswith anthropogenic and natural disturbances (M. Shephardpers. obs.). It can germinate in established hayfields (Royer andDickinson 1999, J. Conn pers. obs.).Other invasive species in the genus (0–3) 3Crepis capillaris (L.) Wallr. is declared noxious in Minnesota(Invaders Database <strong>System</strong> 2003).Aquatic, wetland or riparian species (0–3) 1Narrowleaf hawksbeard can be found on cultivated fields,pastures, <strong>for</strong>age stands, fallow land, roadsides, and railroads(Royer and Dickinson 1999, SAFRR 1984). It is established alongthe Knik River (M. Shephard pers. com.).Total <strong>for</strong> Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 17/25Ecological Amplitude and Distribution ScoreHighly domesticated or a weed <strong>of</strong> agriculture (0–4) 4Narrowleaf hawksbeard is a weed <strong>of</strong> agricultural fields (MAFRI2004, Royer and Dickinson 1999).Known level <strong>of</strong> impact in natural areas (0–6) 1Narrowleaf hawksbeard is not considered as an invader <strong>of</strong> naturalareas (Densmore et al. 2001). However, this taxon degrades anumber <strong>of</strong> habitat types in the Pacific Northwest; it persists indisperse populations in disturbed headlands, grasslands, andclearcuts (M.L. Carlson pers. obs.), additionally it is knownto invade and persist following <strong>for</strong>est fires in interior <strong>Alaska</strong>(Villano 2007).B-28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!