Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environmental Technician, <strong>Native</strong> Lands and Resources, Central Council Tlingitand Haida Indian Tribes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong>. 320 West Willoughby Ave. Suite 300, Juneau, AK 99801. Tel: (907)463-7184 – Pers. comm.Palmblad, I.G. 1968. Competition in experimental populations <strong>of</strong> weeds with emphasis on the regulation <strong>of</strong>population size. Ecology. 49(1): 26-34.Panciera, M.T., S.D. Sparrow, R.G. Gavlak and W.E. Larson. 1990. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>age legume potentialat Fairbanks, Point MacKenzie, and Soldotna. <strong>Alaska</strong> Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station.Research Progress Reports 13.Parchoma G. 2004. Scentless chamomile. Matricatia per<strong>for</strong>ata Merat. In: Guide to Weeds in British Columbia.Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Food and Fisheries. Open Learning Agency. Available: http://www.weedsbc.ca/index.htmlParker, I.M. 2000. Invasion dynamics <strong>of</strong> Cytisus scoparius: A matrix model approach. Ecological Applications10:726-743.Parker, K.F. 1990. An illustrated guide to Arizona weeds. The University <strong>of</strong> Arizona Press, Tucson. Availablehttp://www.uapress.arizona.edu/online.bks/weeds/titlweed.htmParker, I.M., S.K. Mertens, D.W. Schemske. 1993. Distribution <strong>of</strong> seven native and two exotic plants in atallgrass prairie in southeastern Wisconsin: the importance <strong>of</strong> human disturbance. American MidlandNaturalist 130: 43-55.Parsons, W.T. 1957. St. John’s wort in Victoria. History, distribution, control. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,Victoria 55: 781-788.Pavlychenko, T.K. and J.B. Harrington. 1934. Competitive efficiency <strong>of</strong> weeds and cereal crops. CanadianJournal <strong>of</strong> Research 10:77-93.Pavone, L.V. and R.J. Reader. 1982. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> seed bank size and seed state <strong>of</strong> Medicago lupulina. Journal<strong>of</strong> Ecology. 70: 537-547.Pavone, L.V. and R.J. Reader. 1985. Effect <strong>of</strong> microtopography on the survival and reproduction <strong>of</strong> Medicagolupulina. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology; 73: 685-695.Peterson, J.K., M.E. Snook, H.F. Harrison, Jr., and P.F. Mason. 1998. Isolation and structural identification <strong>of</strong>sucrose esters from corn spurry (Spergula arvensis); inhibition <strong>of</strong> seed germination. Journal <strong>of</strong> ChemicalEcology 24: 1803-1816.Pfauth, M. and M. Sytsma. 2005. <strong>Alaska</strong> aquatic plant survey report 2005. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceContract number: 7012050114, Center <strong>of</strong> Lakes and Reservoirs, Portland State University, Portland, OR.Available online http://www. clr.pdx.edu [March 13, 2006].Piggin, C.McE., M.L. Hallett, and D.F. Smith. 1973. The germination response <strong>of</strong> seed <strong>of</strong> some annual pastureplants to alternating temperatures. Seed Science and Technology 1: 739-748.Pitcairn, M.F. 2000. Verbascum thapsus L. In: Invasive plants <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s wildlands. Edited by Bossard, C.C.,J.M. Randall, and M.C. Hoshovsky. University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press. p. 321-326.Pitcher, D. and M.J. Russo. 1988. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Carduus pycnocephalus Italian thistle. TheNature Conservancy. Arlington, Virginia. Available: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/cardpycn.html [2005, May 2].Plant Conservation Alliance Alien Plant Working Group. On-line document http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/alpe1.htm<strong>Plants</strong> <strong>for</strong> a future. 2002. Achillea ptarmica. Available: http://www.ibiblio.org/pfaf/cgi-bin/arr_html?Achillea+ptarmica&CAN=LATIND [January 20, 2005].<strong>Plants</strong> For A Future. 2004. Campanula rapunculoides. Available from: http://www.pfaf.org/index.htmlB-166
<strong>Plants</strong> For A Future. 2002. Plant Portrait - Caragana arborescens Pea tree. http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/pfaf/index.html [June 8, 2004].<strong>Plants</strong> <strong>for</strong> a future. 2002. Species Database. Cotula coronopifolia. Available: http://www.ibiblio.org/pfaf/D_search.html [January 12, 2005].<strong>Plants</strong> <strong>for</strong> a future. 2002. Gypsophila paniculata. Available: http://www.ibiblio.org/pfaf/cgi-bin/arr_html?Gypsophila+paniculata&CAN=LATIND [January 24, 2005].<strong>Plants</strong> <strong>for</strong> a future. 2002. Hieracium umbellatum. Available: http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/pfaf/index.html[July 7, 2004].<strong>Plants</strong> <strong>for</strong> a Future. 2002. Tanacetum vulgare. http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/pfaf/index.html [October 11,2004].<strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hawaii [Internet]. USGS, National Park Service. 2003 March 12; Available from: http://www.hear.org/starr/hiplants/index.htmlPlatt, W.J. 1975. The colonization and <strong>for</strong>mation <strong>of</strong> equilibrium plant species associations on badgerdisturbances in a tall-grass prairie. Ecological Monographs. 45: 285-305.Pojar, J., and A. MacKinnon. 1994. <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Pacific Northwest Coast: Washington, Oregon, BritishColumbia, and <strong>Alaska</strong>. B.C. Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests and Lone Pine Publishing. Redmond, Washington. 527 pp.Pojar, J. Rosaceae. In: Douglas, G.W., D. Meidinger, and J. Pojar, editors. Volume 4. Decotyledons(Orobanchaceae through Rubiaceae). Illustrated flora <strong>of</strong> British Columbia. British Columbia: Ministry <strong>of</strong>Environment, Lands and Parks, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forest; 1999. p 258-370.Polunin, N. 1959. Circumpolar arctic flora. Ox<strong>for</strong>d: At the Clarendon Press. 514 p.Popay, A.I. and E.H. Roberts. 1970. Ecology <strong>of</strong> Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. and Senecio vulgaris L. inrelation to germination behaviour. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 58: 123-139.Popey, A.I. 1981. Germination <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> five annual species <strong>of</strong> barley grass. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology18(2): 547-558.Posey, M. H. 1988. Community changes associated with the spread <strong>of</strong> an introduced seagrass, Zostera japonica.Ecology 69(4): 974-983.Powell, G.W., M.D. Pitt and B.M. Wikeem. 1994. Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>age seeding on early growth and survival <strong>of</strong>lodgepole pine. Journal <strong>of</strong> Range Management 47: 379-384.Powell, G.W., A. Sturko, B.M. Wikeen, and P. Harris. 1994. Field Guide to the biological control <strong>of</strong> weeds inBritish Columbia. Land Management Handbook No. 27. Province <strong>of</strong> British Columbia, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests.Powell, G.W. and E.W. Bork. 2004. Competition and facilitation in mixtures <strong>of</strong> aspen seedlings, alfalfa, andmarsh reedgrass. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1858-1869.Powell, G.W. 1996. Analysis <strong>of</strong> sulphur cinquefoil in British Columbia. Working Paper 16. Victoria, BC: BritishColumbia Ministry <strong>of</strong> Forests Research Program. 36 p.Prasad, R. 2002. Scotch broom, Cytisus scoparius L. in British Columbia. Natural Resources Canada. http://www.pfc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/biodiversity/broom%5Fe.html.Prather, T.S., S.S. Robins, D.W. Morishita, L.W. Lass, R.H. Callihan, and T.W. Miller. 2003. Idaho’s NoxiousWeeds. University <strong>of</strong> Idaho in cooperation with the Idaho Weed Coordinating Committee Idaho StateDepartment <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Available: http://www.oneplan.org/ [January 14, 2005].Pratt, D.A. and H.E. Ahles, R.C. Bell. 1984. Buried viable seed in a ponderosa pine community. CanadianJournal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 62:44-52.Price, E.A.C. and M.J. Hutchings, 1996. The effects <strong>of</strong> competition on growth and <strong>for</strong>m in Glechoma hederacea.Oikos. 75: 279-290.B-167
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147:
Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151:
Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed