Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia sophia. In: Fire Effect In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, (Online). U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer)Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/Howarth, S.E. and J.T. Welliams. 1968. Biological flora <strong>of</strong> the British Isles. Chrysanthemum Leucanthemum L.Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 56:585-595.Hoveland, C.S. and E.D. Donnelly. 1966. Response <strong>of</strong> Vicia genotypes to flooding. Agronomy Journal 58: 341-345.Hull, A.C.Jr and J.O. Evans. 1973. Musk thistle (Carduus nutans): An undesirable range plant. Journal <strong>of</strong> RangeManagement 26(5): 383-385.Hultén, E. 1968. Flora <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> and Neighboring Territories. Stan<strong>for</strong>d University Press, Stan<strong>for</strong>d, CA. 1008 p.Hume, L., J. Martinez, and K. Best. 1983. The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadian weeds. 60. Polygonum convolvulus L.Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Science 63: 959-971.Hurka, H. and R. Haase. 1982. Seed ecology <strong>of</strong> Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae): dispersal mechanism andthe soil seed bank. Flora 172: 35-46.Hurteau, M.D. and R. Briggs. 2003. Common yarrow - Achillea millefolium L. Plant fact sheet. United StatesDepartment <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Available: http://plants.usda.gov [13 December, 2004].Hutchings, M.J. and E.A.C. Price. 1999. Glechoma hederacea L. (Nepeta glechoma Benth., N. hederacea (L.)Trev.). Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 87: 347-364.Hutchison, M. 1992. Vegetation management guideline: Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.). NaturalAreas Journal. 12: 160-161.Hutchison, M. 1992. Vegetation management guideline: Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinaceae L.).Natural Areas Journal 12(3): 159.Inderjit and K.M.M. Dakshini. 1998. Allelopathic interference <strong>of</strong> chickweed, Stellaria media with seedlinggrowth <strong>of</strong> wheat (Triticum aestivum). Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 76: 1317-1321.Integrated Pest Management Program. 2004. <strong>Alaska</strong> statewide list <strong>of</strong> invasive garden flowers. University <strong>of</strong><strong>Alaska</strong> Fairbanks, Cooperative Extension Service.International Legume Database & In<strong>for</strong>mational Service. 2003. Available: http://www.ildis.org/. [June 28,2004].Invaders Database <strong>System</strong>. The University <strong>of</strong> Montana. 2003. Montana Noxious Weed Trust Fund.Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. http://invader.dbs.umt.edu/Ivens, G.W. 1979. Stinking mayweed. New Zealand Journal <strong>of</strong> Agriculture 138: 21-23.ITIS – Integrated Taxonomic In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>. 2002. Hordeum jubatum L. Available: http://www.itis.usda.gov/index.html. [November 10, 2004].ITIS – Integrated Taxonomic In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>. 2002. http://www.itis.usda.govJacono, C.C. and M.M. Richerson. 2003. <strong>Non</strong>indigenous Aquatic <strong>Plants</strong>. Myriophyllum spicatum L. U.S.Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior. Geological Survey. Biological Resources Division. Center <strong>for</strong> Aquatic ResourceStudies. http://nas.er.usgs.gov.Jacono, C. 1998. Spartina alterniflora Loisel. <strong>Non</strong>indigenous aquatic species. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior.Geological Survey. Biological Resources Division. Center <strong>for</strong> Aquatic Resource Studies. Available: http://nas.er.usgs.gov/plants/docs/sp_alter.html [November 8, 2004].Japanese Knotweed Alliance. 2004. On Line Document. http://www.cabi-bioscience.org/html/japanese_knotweed_alliance.htm.Jennersten, O., L. Berg, and C. Lehman. 1988. Phenological differences in pollinator visitation, pollendeposition and seed set in the sticky catchfly, Viscaria vulgaris. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 76 (4): 1111-1132.B-158
Jessen, K. and H. Helbaek. 1944. Cereal and weeds in Great Britain and Ireland in prehistoric and early historictimes. K. danske vidensk. Selsk. Biol. Skr., 3: 1-68.Jessep, C.T. 1990. Aspects <strong>of</strong> the biology <strong>of</strong> nodding thistle (Carduus nutans L.) in Canterbury, New Zealand.New Zealand Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research 33: 173-183.Jesson, L., D. Kelly, and A. Sparrow. 2000. The importance <strong>of</strong> dispersal, disturbance, and competition <strong>for</strong> exoticplant invasions in Arthur’s Pass National Park, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 38: 451-468.Johnson, D., L. Kershaw, A. MacKinnon, and J. Pojar. 1995. <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> the western boreal <strong>for</strong>est and aspenparkland. Alberta, Canada: Lone Pine. p. 103.Joyce, J.C., W.T. Haller and D.E. Colle. 1980. Investigation <strong>of</strong> the presence and survivability <strong>of</strong> hydrillapropagules in waterfowl. Aquatics 2: 10-14.Joyce, J.C., K.A. Langeland, T.K. Van and V.V. Vandiver, Jr. 1992. Organic sedimentation associated withhydrilla management. Journal <strong>of</strong> Aquatic Plant Management 30: 20-23.Juras, L., E. Johnson, and R. Holm. 2004. Scentless chamomile. Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food and RuralRevitalization, Saskatchewan, Canada. Available: http://www.agr.gov.sk.ca/default.asp [October 12,2004].Kadereit, J.W. 1984. Studies on the biology <strong>of</strong> Senecio vulgaris L. ssp. denticulatus (O.F. Muell.) P.D. Sell. NewPhytologist 97: 681-689.Kadrmas, T. and W.S. Johnson. 2004. Identifying and managing sulfur cinquefoil. Cooperative Extension,University <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Reno. Available: http://www.unce.unr.edu/publications/FS03/FS0304.pdfAccessed 2005 Feb 21.Kar, R.K. and M.A. Choudhuri. 1982. Effect <strong>of</strong> desiccation on internal changes with respect <strong>of</strong> survival <strong>of</strong>Hydrilla verticillata. Hidrobiological bulletin 16(2): 213-221.Kay, Q.O.N. 1971. Biological flora <strong>of</strong> the British Isles. Anthemis cotula L. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 59(2): 623-636.Kay, Q.O.N., A.J. Lack, F.C. Bamber, and C.R. Davies. 1984. Differences between sexes in floral morphology,nectar production and insect visits in a dioecious species, Silene dioica. New Phytologist 98(3): 515-529.Kaye, T. 2001. Brachypodium sylvaticum (Poaceae) in the Pacific Northwest. Botanical Electronic News.Available: http://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/ben277.html [February 1, 2005].Keiffer, C.H. and I.A. Ungar. 2002. Germination and establishment <strong>of</strong> halophytes on brine-affected soils.Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology. 39: 402-415.Kellman, M. 1974. Preliminary seed budgets <strong>for</strong> two plant communities in coastal British Columbia. Journal <strong>of</strong>Biogeography 1(2): 123-133.Kiltz, B.F. 1930. Perennial weeds which spread vegetatively. Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy22(3): 216-234.King County. 2004. Policemen’s helmet Impatiens glandulifera. Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources and Parks,Water, and Land Resources Division Noxious Weed Control Program. 206 296-0290 TTY Relay: 711.Available: http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/LANDS/Weeds/impatiens.htm [November 2, 2004].Kivilaan, A. and R.S. Bandurski. 1981. The one hundred-year period <strong>for</strong> Dr. Beal’s seed viability experiment.American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 68(9): 1290-1292.Klebesadel, L.J. 1980. Birdvetch. Forage crop, ground cover, ornamental, or weed? Agroborealis January/1980:46-49.Klett, A.T., H.F. Duebbert, and G.L. Heismeyer. 1984. Use <strong>of</strong> seeded native grasses as nesting cover by ducks.Wildlife Society Bulletin, 12: 134-138.Klinkhamer, P.G.L. and T.J. De Jong. 1993. Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. (Carduus lanceolatus L., Cirsiumlanceolatum (L.) Scop., non Hill). Biological flora <strong>of</strong> the British Isles. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 81: 177-191.B-159
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed