Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hickman (ed.) The Jepson Manual <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. University <strong>of</strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press, Berkley. Pp. 1400.Anderson, E.W. and L.E. Brooks. 1975. Reducing erosion hazard on a burned <strong>for</strong>est in Oregon by seeding.Journal <strong>of</strong> Range Management 28(5): 394-398.Anderson, L.W.J. and D.F. Spencer. 1999. Foiling watermilfoil. Agricultural Research, 47 (3): 16-17.Anderson, R.L. 1996. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) emergence variability in a Semiarid Region. WeedTechnology. 10:750-753.Andersson, S. 1991. Floral display and pollination success in Achillea ptarmica. Holarctic Ecology 14: 186-191.Apfelbaum, S.I. and C.E. Sams. 1987. Ecology and control <strong>of</strong> reed canary grass. (Phalaris arundinacea L.).Natural Areas Journal 7(2):69-74.APMS – The Aquatic Plant Management Society. 2004. Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canarygrass. [June 2,2004].Arnold, R.M. 1982. Pollination, predation and seed set in Linaria vulgaris (Scrophulariaceae). AmericanMidland Naturalist. 107 (2): 360-369.Ashton, P.A. and R.J. Abbott. 1992. Isozyme evidence and the origin <strong>of</strong> Senecio vulgaris (Compositae). Plant<strong>System</strong>atics and Evolution 179: 167-174.Askew, S.D. and J.W. Wilcut. 2002. Pale smartweed interference and achene production in cotton. WeedScience 50: 357-363.Auchmoody, L.R. and R.S. Walters. 1988. Revegetation <strong>of</strong> a brine-killed <strong>for</strong>est site. Soil Science Society <strong>of</strong>America Journal. 52: 277-280.Austin, D.F. 2000. Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis, Convolvulaceae) in North America, from medicine tomenace. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Torrey Botanical Society 127(2): 172-177.Austin, M.P., R.H. Groves, L.M. Fresco, P.E. Kaye. 1985. Relative growth <strong>of</strong> six thistle species along a nutrientgradient with multispecies competition. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 73(2): 667-684.Australia’s Virtual Herbarium [INTERNET]. Melbourne: Royal Botanical Garden. 2005 Feb 09; Availablefrom: http://www.rbg.vic.gov.au/cgi-bin/avhpublic/avh.cgi?session=1108009789507Badger, K.S. and I.A. Ungar. 1990. Effects <strong>of</strong> soil salinity on growth and ion content <strong>of</strong> the inland halophyteHordeum jubatum. Botanical Gazette. 151(3): 314-321.Badger, K.S. and I.A. Ungar. 1994. Seed bank dynamics in an inland salt marsh, with special emphasis on thehalophyte Hordeum jubatum L. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Sciences. 155(1):66-72.Baker, D.V., T.L. Steinke, and S.K. McDonald. 2003. Flixweed Descurainia sophia. Colorado State University.Baker, H.G. 1974. The evolution <strong>of</strong> weeds. Annual Review <strong>of</strong> Ecology and <strong>System</strong>atics 5: 1-24.Bakshi, T.S. and R.T. Coupland. 1960. Vegetative propagation in Linaria vulgaris. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany38: 243-249.Baranova O.G., Botanist, Udmurt State University, 1 Universitetskay, Izhevsk, Russia. Tel: 011-7-3412-755-772Pers. com.Bard, G.E. 1952. Secondary succession on the Piedmont <strong>of</strong> New Jersey. Ecological Monographs. 22(3):195-215.Barko, J.W. and R.M. Smart. 1981. Comparative influences <strong>of</strong> light and temperature on the growth andmetabolism <strong>of</strong> selected submersed freshwater macrophytes. Ecological Monographs 51(2): 219-235.Basiouny, F.M., W.T. Haller and L.A. Garrard. 1978. Survival <strong>of</strong> hydrilla (Hyrdilla verticillata) plants andpropagules after removal from the aquatic habitat. Weed Science 26: 502-504.Baskin, J.M. and C.C. Baskin. 1990. Role <strong>of</strong> temperature and light in the germination ecology <strong>of</strong> buried seeds<strong>of</strong> Potentilla recta. Annals <strong>of</strong> Applied Biology 117(3): 611-616.B-144
Batcher, M.S. 2002. Element Stewardship Abstract <strong>for</strong> Elytrigia repens var. repens (L.) Desv. ex B.D. JacksonSynonyms: Agropyron repens L. (Beauv.), Elymus repens (L.) Gould Quackgrass. The Nature Conservancy.Arlington, VA.Batcher, M.S. and S.A. Stiles. 2005. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim(Amur honeysuckle), Lonicera morrowii A. Gray (Morrow’s honeysuckle), Lonicera tatatica L. (Tatarianhoneysuckle), Lonicera x bella Zabel (Bell’s honeysuckle). The bush honeysuckles. The Nature Conservancy.Arlington, Virginia.Batra, S.W. 1979. Insects associated with weeds in the northeastern United States. II. Cinquefoils, Potentillanorvegica and P. recta (Rosaceae). New York Entomological Society 87(3): 216-222.Batra, S.W.T. 1979. Insects associated with weeds in the northeastern United States. III. Chickweed, Stellariamedia, and stitchwort, S. graminea (Caryophyllaceae). Journal <strong>of</strong> the New York Entomological Society87(3): 223-235.Beck, K.G. 2004. Fact Sheet No. 3.102: Musk thistle. CO: Colorado State University, Cooperative Extension.Available: http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/natres/03102.html [2005, May 2].Beck, K.G. Oxeye Daisy biology and management. Colorado State University.Beck, K.G. 2001. Biology and management <strong>of</strong> the toadflaxes. Colorado State, University CooperativeExtension. Available online: http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/natres/03114.htmlBeckwith, S.L. 1954. Ecological succession on abandoned farm lands and its relationship to wildlifemanagement. Ecological Monographs 24(4): 349-376.Beddows, A.R. 1959. Dactylis glomerata L. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 47(1): 223-239.Beddows, A.R. 1973. Biological flora <strong>of</strong> the British Isles: Lolium multuflorum Lam. (L. perenne L. ssp.multiflorum (Lam.) Husnot, L. italicum A. Braun). The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 61(2): 587-600.Beerling, D.J. 1993. The impact <strong>of</strong> temperature on the northern distribution limits <strong>of</strong> the introduced speciesFallopia japonica and Impatiens glandulifera in North-West Europe. Journal <strong>of</strong> Biogeography. 20 (1): 45-53.Beerling, D.J., J.P. Bailey, and A.P. Conolly. 1994. Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decraene. Journal <strong>of</strong>Ecology 82:959-979.Beerling, D.J., and H.A. Dawah. 1993. Abundance and diversity <strong>of</strong> invertebrates associated with Fallopiajaponica (Houtt. Ronse Decraene) and Impatiens glandulifera (Royle): two alien plant species in the BritishIsles. The Entomologist 112:127-139.Belcher, J.W. and S.D. Wilson. 1989. Leafy spurge and the species composition <strong>of</strong> mixed-grass prairie. Journal<strong>of</strong> Range Management 42: 172-175.Bell, L.W. 2004. Relative growth rate, resource allocation and root morphology in the perennial legumes,Medicago sativa, Dorycnium rectum and D. hirsutum grown under controlled conditions. Plant and Soil. 0:1-13.Bender, J. and J. Rendall. 1987. Element Stewardship Abstract <strong>for</strong> Lythrum salicaria Purple Loosestrife. TheNature Conservancy. Arlington, VA.Bennett, B. 2007. What species are becoming a problem in the Yukon. 8th Annual <strong>Alaska</strong> Committee <strong>for</strong>Noxious and Invasive Plant Management Workshop presentation. 15 November 2007, Fairbanks, <strong>Alaska</strong>.Bennett, B. Botanist. Yukon Environment. NatureServe Yukon (V-5N). P.O. Box 2703, Whitehorse, YukonY1A2C6. Tel: (867) 667-5331, fax: (867) 393-6405. Pers. com.Bergelson, J. 1990. Life after death: site preemption by the remains <strong>of</strong> Poa annua. Ecology. 71(6): 2157-2165.Bergelson, J., J.A. Newman, E.M. Floresroux. 1993. Rates <strong>of</strong> weed spread in spatially heterogeneousenvironments. Ecology 74: 999-1011.B-145
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131: Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133: Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135: Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137: Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139: Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed