Current global distribution (0–5) 3Red clover is native to Southeastern Europe and Asia Minor.Today its distribution includes Europe, Southwest Asia, Africa,and North America (Hultén 1968). Red clover has not beendocumented in the Arctic (Markenschlager 1934, Lid and Lid1994, Gubanov et al. 2003).Extent <strong>of</strong> the species U.S. range and/or occurrence <strong>of</strong>5<strong>for</strong>mal state or provincial listing (0–5)Red clover can be found throughout the United States andCanada (USDA, NRCS 2006). This species is not consideredinvasive in North America (Rice 2006).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Amplitude and Distribution 16/25Feasibility <strong>of</strong> ControlScoreSeed banks (0–3) 3The seeds <strong>of</strong> red clover remain viable in the soil <strong>for</strong> 3–5 years(Duvel 1904, Dorph-Petersen 1925). A low survival rate wasrecorded <strong>for</strong> seeds stored in undisturbed soil <strong>for</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> 20(Lewis 1973) and even 30 years (Toole 1946).Vegetative regeneration (0–3) 2Varieties <strong>of</strong> red clover are adapted to be grazed or cut <strong>for</strong> hay andable to resprout (Densmore et al. 2001, USDA, NRCS 2006).Level <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t required (0–4) 2Red clover can be controlled by mechanical methods (Densmoreet al. 2001). It appears to be resistant to some chemicals (Rutledgeand McLendon 1996).Total <strong>for</strong> Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 7/10Total score <strong>for</strong> 4 sections 51/97§Trifolium repens L.<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesYesPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 40 22Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 25 15Amplitude and Distribution 25 14Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 10 8Relative Maximum 59Climatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?common names: white clover, ladino clover,Dutch cloverCLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes –Arctic Alpine Yes –Trifolium repens has been collected in the south coastal, interiorboreal, and arctic alpine ecogeographic regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> (Hultén1968, AKEPIC 2004, UAM 2004).Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 7White clover alters edaphic conditions due to nitrogen fixation(USDA 2002). This plant may alter succession by delaying theestablishment <strong>of</strong> native species (Rutledge and McLendon 1996).However, it is primarily associated with anthropogenicallyaltered communities in <strong>Alaska</strong> (M.L. Carlson pers. obs.).Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 7White clover creates a nearly monospecific low herbaceous<strong>for</strong>b layer, eliminating graminoids and other low herbaceousspecies (I. Lapina pers. obs.). Trifolium repens occupies the samefundamental niche space as many grasses and dicotyledonousherbs and is in direct competition with these species (Turkingtonet al. 1979)Impact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 3White clover may delay the establishment <strong>of</strong> native species(Rutledge and McLendon 1996). It appears to reduce diversity<strong>of</strong> native species along roadsides and trail edges in <strong>Alaska</strong>(M.L. Carlson pers. obs.)B-134Impact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10) 5White clover produces cyanogenic glycosides that are poisonousto cattle and other herbivores (Ennos 1981). It is an alternate host<strong>for</strong> alfalfa mosaic and pea mottle viruses (Royer and Dickinson1999). White clover potentially alters the pollination ecology<strong>of</strong> ecological communities (M. Carlson pers. obs., J. Snyder prs.obs.).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 22/40Biological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 3White clover reproduces by seeds and creeping stems that rootat nodes (Royer and Dickinson 1999). It is an extremely mobilespecies by spreading rhizomes (Thórhallsdóttir 1999). It has highseeds abundance (Rutledge and McLendon 1996).Long-distance dispersal (0–3) 2Most seed likely is spread incidentally by the movement <strong>of</strong>animals and humans (Rutledge and McLendon 1996). However,the plant does not have any adaptations <strong>for</strong> long-distancedispersal.Spread by humans (0–3) 3White clover is seeded <strong>for</strong> revegetation on roadsides and otherdisturbed areas (Densmore et al. 2001). It has been found carriedon motor vehicles (Hodkinson and Thompson 1997).Allelopathic (0–2) 0There are no records <strong>for</strong> allelopathic effects <strong>for</strong> this species,despite a large volume <strong>of</strong> literature.Competitive Ability (0–3) 2Its establishment by seed and rhizome fragments is significantlyreduced by the presence <strong>of</strong> graminoid and <strong>for</strong>b competitors(Turkington et al. 1979), but it is able to invade particulargraminoid stands (Thórhallsdóttir 1999). The species has anintermediate level <strong>of</strong> nitrogen-fixing ability (USDA 2002).Thicket-<strong>for</strong>ming/Smothering growth <strong>for</strong>m (0–2) 1White clover <strong>for</strong>ms dense, low stands due to its rhizomatousgrowth, but does not overtop taller vegetation (I. Lapina pers.obs.).
Germination requirements (0–3) 0Seedlings are rare and only established in disturbed areas,including molehills (Turkington et al. 1979). Soil temperatures<strong>of</strong> at least 50 °F are required <strong>for</strong> germination (Royer andDickinson 1999). The seeds do not germinate until the seed coatis sufficiently broken down (by decay or abrasion) to admit water(Densmore et al. 2001).Other invasive species in the genus (0–3) 3Trifolium angustifolium L., T. arvense L., T. aureum L., T. campestreSchreb., T. dubium Sibth., T. hirtum All., T. hybridum L.,T. incarnatum L., T. pratense L., and T. subterraneum L.Aquatic, wetland or riparian species (0–3) 1White clover is a serious weed <strong>of</strong> lawns, roadsides, and disturbedareas (Hultén 1968; Royer and Dickinson 1999).Total <strong>for</strong> Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 15/25Ecological Amplitude and Distribution ScoreHighly domesticated or a weed <strong>of</strong> agriculture (0–4) 4White clover was common as a <strong>for</strong>age crop in Canada (Royerand Dickinson 1999) It has been widely planted <strong>for</strong> lawns andrevegetation on roadsides and other disturbed areas in <strong>Alaska</strong>(Densmore et al. 2001).Known level <strong>of</strong> impact in natural areas (0–6) 1White clover invades prairies in Wisconsin (WDNR 2004).Role <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic and natural disturbance inestablishment (0–5)In <strong>Alaska</strong> white clover is found in sites disturbed in recent yearsand readily invades open habitats (Densmore et al. 2001). Itis relatively shade intolerant (USDA 2002). Frequent, intensegrazing encourages growth <strong>of</strong> white clover (Rutledge andMcLendon 1996).0Current global distribution (0–5) 5White clover is native to Europe and Asia. It has been introducedto North and southern Africa, North and South America, NewZealand, Australia, Tasmania, and India (Hultén 1968). It is <strong>of</strong>tenfound north <strong>of</strong> the Arctic Circle (Royer and Dickinson 1999).Extent <strong>of</strong> the species U.S. range and/or occurrence <strong>of</strong>4<strong>for</strong>mal state or provincial listing (0–5)White clover occurs in nearly all states <strong>of</strong> the United States. It islisted as a weed in Kentucky (USDA 2002).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Amplitude and Distribution 14/25Feasibility <strong>of</strong> ControlScoreSeed banks (0–3) 3Seeds <strong>of</strong> white clover remain viable in the soil over 30 years(Rutledge and McLendon 1996).Vegetative regeneration (0–3) 2Grazing promotes resprouting <strong>of</strong> white clover (Rutledge andMcLendon 1996).Level <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>t required (0–4) 3It is virtually impossible to eradicate white clover from invadedsites (Densmore et al. 2001). Herbicides can be used to controlwhite clover (Rutledge and McLendon 1996).Total <strong>for</strong> Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 8/10Total score <strong>for</strong> 4 sections 59/100§Tripleurospermum per<strong>for</strong>ata(Merat) M. Lainz<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesYesPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 40 13Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 23 13Amplitude and Distribution 25 15Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 10 6Relative Maximum 48Climatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?common names: scentless false mayweed,scentless chamomileCLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes –Arctic Alpine Yes –Scentless false mayweed has been collected in the south coastal,interior boreal, and arctic alpine ecogeographic regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong>(AKEPIC 2004, UAM 2004).Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 3Scentless false mayweed reduces soil moisture and nutrients<strong>for</strong> other species. It likely causes retardation <strong>of</strong> successionalestablishment <strong>of</strong> native species (NAPPO 2003).B-135Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 3Dense stands <strong>of</strong> scentless false mayweed in prairies have beenreported (CWMA 2000, NAPPO 2003, Parchoma 2004). Thisplant has not been observed in dense stands in <strong>Alaska</strong>, but it doesincrease the density <strong>of</strong> the early successional herbaceous layer(I. Lapina pers. obs.).Impact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 3Spring-emergent seedlings can <strong>for</strong>m very dense stands, reducingthe growth <strong>of</strong> seedlings <strong>of</strong> other species (NAPPO 2003).Impact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10) 4Scentless false mayweed is unpalatable to animals and can <strong>for</strong>mdense stands in pastures and hayfields, thus altering the quantity<strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>aging sites (CWMA 2000, Parchoma 2004). The flowersattract bees and flies (Harris and McClay 2003) and may alter thepollination ecology <strong>of</strong> native communities.Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 13/40Biological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 3Scentless false mayweed reproduces entirely by copious amounts<strong>of</strong> seed. A single plant can produce up to a million seeds, withdense stands capable <strong>of</strong> producing 1,800,000 seeds per squaremeter (Harris and McClay 2003, Juras et al. 2004, NAPPO 2003,Parchoma 2004).
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121: Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125: Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131: Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133: Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135: Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137: Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139: Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220:
4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed