Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Goat’s Beard. In Hickman, J. C. (ed.) The Jepson Manual: Higher <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. pp. 354-355.Steenhagen, D.A. and R.L. Zimdahl. 1979. Allelophathy <strong>of</strong> leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Science 27:1-3.Steinbach, K. and G. Gottsberger. 1994. Phynology and pollination biology <strong>of</strong> five Ranunculus species inGiessen, Central Germany. Phyton 34(2): 203-218.Steinbauer, G.P. and B. Grigsby. 1958. Dormancy and germination characteristics <strong>of</strong> the seeds <strong>of</strong> sheep sorrel,Rumex acetosella L. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Association <strong>of</strong> Official Seed Analysts on North America 48: 118-120.Stensvold, M. 2000. Noxious weed surveys and projects conducted on the Tongass National Forest 1997-2000.Technical report on file, Tongass National Forest. 2 pp.Stephenson, D.W. 1993. Barley grass control with herbicides in subterranean clover pasture. 2. Effect onpasture and wheat in the year following spraying. Australian Journal <strong>of</strong> Experimental Agriculture 33: 743-749.Stevens, O.A. 1932. The number and weight <strong>of</strong> seeds produced by weeds. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 19(9):784-794.Stevens, O.A. 1957. Weights <strong>of</strong> seeds and numbers per plant. Weeds 5: 46-55.Steward, K.K. 1992. Survival and growth <strong>of</strong> stem fragments from various hydrilla races. Florida Scientist 55:129-135.Stewart, F. and J. Grace. 1984. An experimental study <strong>of</strong> hybridization between Heracleum mantegazzianumSomm &Levier and H. sphondylium L. subsp. sphondylium (Umbelliferae). Watsonia 15: 73-83.Stoa, T. E. (1933) Persistence <strong>of</strong> viability <strong>of</strong> sweet clover seed in a cultivated soil. Journal <strong>of</strong> the AmericanSociety <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, 177-181.Story, J.M., K.W. Boggs, and R.M. Nowierski. 1989. Effect <strong>of</strong> two introduced seed head flies on spottedknapweed. Montana AgResearch Winter 1989: 14-17.Story, J.M., K.W. Boggs, and W.R. Good. 1991. First report <strong>of</strong> the establishment <strong>of</strong> Agapeta zoegana L.(Lepidoptera: Cochylidae) on spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lamarck, in the United States. TheCanadian Entomologist March/April 1991: 411-412.Sullivan, J. 1992. Dactylis glomerata. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, [Online]. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2006, April 5].Sullivan, J. 1992. Medicago sativa. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, [Online]. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2005, October 4].Sullivan, J. 1992. Melilotus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, [Online]. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2004, March 31].Sutton, D.L., T.K. Van and K.M. Portier. 1992. Growth <strong>of</strong> dioecious and monoecious hydrilla from singletubers. Journal <strong>of</strong> Aquatic Plant Management 30: 15-20.Swan, D.G. and R.J. Chancellor. 1976. Regenerative capacity <strong>of</strong> field bindweed roots. Weed Science 24(3): 306-308.Swearing, J.M. 2002. Purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria. U.S. National Park Service. On Line Report. www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/lysa1.htm.Swenson, J.E. 1985. Seasonal habitat use by sharp-tailed grouse, Tympanuchus phasianellus, on mixed-grassprairie in Montana. Canadian Field-Naturalist 99(1): 40-46.B-172
Sytsma, M., M. Pfauth, and D. Isaacson. 2003. Spartina response plan <strong>for</strong> Oregon. 4th <strong>Alaska</strong> noxious andinvasive plants management workshop.Tesky, J.L. 1992. Hordeum jubatum. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, [Online]. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2004, November 10].Thompson, D.Q. 1991. History <strong>of</strong> purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) Biological control ef<strong>for</strong>ts. NaturalAreas Journal. 11(3): 148-150.Thompson, Daniel Q., Ronald L. Stuckey, Edith B. Thompson. 1987. Spread, Impact, and Control <strong>of</strong> PurpleLoosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American Wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 55 pages.Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/plants/loosstrf/index.htm (Version 04JUN1999).Thompson, K. and J.P. Grime, 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks <strong>of</strong> herbaceous species in tencontrasting habitats, Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology. 67: 893-921.Thompson, P.A. 1975. Characterization <strong>of</strong> the germination responses <strong>of</strong> Silene dioica (L.) Clairv., Populationsfrom Europe. Annals <strong>of</strong> Botany 39(159): 1-19.Thórhallsdóttir, T.E. 1999. The dynamics <strong>of</strong> five grasses and white clover in a simulated mosaic sward. Journal<strong>of</strong> Ecology 78:909-923.Thorne, R.F. Hydrocharitaceae Waterweed family. In: Hickman, J.C., editor. The Jepson manual higher plants<strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press; 1993. Pp. 1150-1151.Thullen, J.S. 1990. Production <strong>of</strong> axillary turions by the dioecious Hydrilla verticillata. Journal <strong>of</strong> Aquatic PlantManagement 28: 11-15.Tiley, G.G.D. and Philp B. 1992. Strategy <strong>for</strong> the control <strong>of</strong> giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) on theRiver Ayr in Scotland. Aspects <strong>of</strong> Applied Biology 29: 463-466.Tiley, G.E.D., S.D. Felicite, and P.M. Wade. 1996. Biological flora <strong>of</strong> the British Isles. Heracleummantegazzianum Sommier & Levier. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 84: 297-319.Tirmenstein, D. 1989. Rubus discolor. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong> [online]. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ via the INTERNET. Accessed 2005 Feb 07.Tisdale, E.W., M. Hironaka, W.L. Pringle. 1959. Observations on the autecology <strong>of</strong> Hypericum per<strong>for</strong>atum.Ecology 40(1): 54-62.Timmons, F.L. 1949. Duration <strong>of</strong> viability <strong>of</strong> bindweed seed under field conditions and experimental results inthe control <strong>of</strong> bindweed seedlings. Agronomy Journal 41: 130-133.Trivedi, S. and R.S. Tripathi. 1982a. The effect <strong>of</strong> soil texture and moisture on reproductive strategies <strong>of</strong>Spergula arvensis L. and Plantago major L. Weed Research 22: 41-49.Trivedi, S. and R.S. Tripathi. 1982b. Growth and reproductive strategies <strong>of</strong> two annual weeds as affected by soilnitrogen and density levels. New Phytologist 91: 489-500.Todd, F.G., F.R. Stermitz, P. Schultheis, A.P. Knight, and J. Traub-Dargatz. 1995. Tropane alkaloids andtoxicity <strong>of</strong> Convolvulus arvensis. Phytochemistry 39(2): 301-303.Tolmatchev, A.I., editor. 1975. Flora Arctica URSS. Vol. VII. Papaveraceae – Cruciferae. Leninopoli: EditioNauka. 180 pp.Tolmachev, A.I., Packer, J.G., Griffiths, G.C.D, editors. Flora <strong>of</strong> the Russian arctic. Vol. I. Polypodiaceae –Gramineae. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: The University <strong>of</strong> Alberta Press; 1995. 330 p. In Russian.Toole, E.H. 1946. Final result <strong>of</strong> the Duvel buried seed experiment. Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research 72: 201-210.B-173
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147:
Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151:
Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157:
Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed