Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance dispersal <strong>of</strong> seeds by retention in digestive tract <strong>of</strong> birds. Science 160: 321-322.Prots, B. and S. Klotz. 2004. The invasion ecology <strong>of</strong> Himalayan Balsam (Impatiens glandulifera Royle). UFZCentre <strong>for</strong> Environmental Research. Leipzig. Available: http://www.hdg.ufz.de/index.php?en=1094[November 2, 2004].Putwain, P.D. and J.L. Harper. 1970. Studies in the dynamics <strong>of</strong> plant populations: III. The influence <strong>of</strong>associated species on populations <strong>of</strong> Rumex acetosa L. and R. acetosella L. in grassland. The Journal <strong>of</strong>Ecology 58(1): 251-264.Putwain, P.D., D. Machin and J.L. Harper. 1968. Studies in the dynamics <strong>of</strong> plant populations: II. Componentsand regulation <strong>of</strong> a natural population <strong>of</strong> Rumex acetosella L. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 56(2): 421-431.Pyle, L.L. 1995. Effects <strong>of</strong> disturbance on herbaceous exotic plants species on the flood plain <strong>of</strong> the Potomacriver. American Midland Naturalist 134:224-253.CLIMEX <strong>for</strong> Windows, Version 1.1a. 1999. CISROPublishing, Australia.Pysek, P. 1991. Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republic – the dynamics <strong>of</strong> spreading from thehistorical perspective. Folia geobotanica and phytotaxonomica 26: 439-454.Pysek, P. and K. Prach. 1993 July. Plant invasions and the role <strong>of</strong> riparian habitats: a comparison <strong>of</strong> four speciesalien to Central Europe. Journal <strong>of</strong> Biogeography 20 (4): 413-420.Pysek, P. and A. Pysek. 1995. Invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in different habitats in the CzechRepublic. Journal <strong>of</strong> vegetation science 6 (5): 711-718.Qasem, J.R. and T.A. Hill. 1989. Possible role <strong>of</strong> allelopathy in the competition between tomato, Senecio vulgarisL. and Chenopodium album L. Weed Research 29: 349-356.Quayyum, H.A., A.U. Mallik and P.F. Lee. 1999. Allelopathic potential <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants associated with wildrice (Zizania palustris): I. Bioassay with plant and lake sediment samples. Journal <strong>of</strong> Chemical Ecology25(1): 209-220.Randall, J.M. and M. Rejmánek. 1993. Interference <strong>of</strong> bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare) with growth <strong>of</strong> ponderosapine (Pinus ponderosa) seedlings in a <strong>for</strong>est plantation. Canadian J. <strong>of</strong> Forest Research. 23: 1507-13.Rasy, M. Integrated Pest Management Technician. Cooperative Extension Service, University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong>Fairbanks. 2221 E. Northern Lights Boulevard, Suite 118, Anchorage, AK 99508-4143; tel. (907) 786-6309– Pers. obs.Reidar, E. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Natural History Museum, Botanical Museum, University <strong>of</strong> Oslo, Box 1172 Blindern,N-0318 Oslo, Norway, phone:47 22 85 16 32, fax: 47 22 85 18 35.Remaley, T. 2004. Musk thistle Carduus nutans L. Aster family (Asteraceae). The Plant Conservation Alliance’sAlien Plant Working Group. Available: http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/canu1.htm [2005, May 2].Remaley, T. 1998. Eurasian watermilfoil Myriophyllum spicatum L. Plant Conservation Alliance, Bureau <strong>of</strong>Land Management. Available: http://www.nps.gov/plants/index.htm [Feb 18, 2004].Remberton, R.W. 1988. Myrmecochory in the introduced range, leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) AmericanMidland Naturalist 119: 431-435.Renz, M.J. 2000. Element stewardship abstract <strong>for</strong> Lepidium latifolium L. perennial pepperweed, tall whitetop.The Nature Conservancy. Arlington, Virginia. Available: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/lepilati.html [2005, May 2].Rice, P.M. INVADERS Database <strong>System</strong> (http://invader.dbs.umt.edu). Division <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences,University <strong>of</strong> Montana, Missoula, MT 59812-4824.Rice, P.M., J.C. Tonye, D.J. Bedunah and C.E. Carlson. 1997. Plant community diversity and growth <strong>for</strong>mresponses to herbicide applications <strong>for</strong> control <strong>of</strong> Centaurea maculosa. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology 34: 1397-1412.B-168
Rice, P.M. 2006. INVADERS Database <strong>System</strong> (http://invader.dbs.umt.edu). Division <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences,University <strong>of</strong> Montana, Missoula, MT 59812-4824.Rice, P.M. 1991. Sulfur cinquefoil: a new threat to biological diversity. Western Wildlands 17: 234-240.Richardson, R.G. 1975. Regeneration <strong>of</strong> blackberry (Rubus procerus P. J. Muell.) from root segments. WeedResearch 15: 335-337.Riley, J. Horticulture Agent, UAF Cooperative Extension Service, 2221 E. Northern Lights Blvd. #118Anchorage, AK 99508-4143; tel: (907) 786-6306. Pers. com.Rinella, M.J. and R.L. Sheley. 2002. Orange and meadow hawkweed. Montana State University ExtensionService Bozeman, MT. http://www.montana.edu/wwwpb/pubs/Roberts, H.A. and J.E. Neilson. 1981. Seed survival and periodicity <strong>of</strong> seedling emergence in twelve weedyspecies <strong>of</strong> Compositae. Annals <strong>of</strong> Applied Biology 97: 325-334.Roberts, H.A. and P.M. Feast. 1973. Emergence and longevity <strong>of</strong> seeds <strong>of</strong> annual weeds in cultivated andundisturbed soil. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology. 10(1): 133-143.Roberts, H.A. and F.G. Stokes. 1966. Studies on the weeds <strong>of</strong> vegetable crops. VI. Seed populations <strong>of</strong> soilunder commercial cropping. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology 3: 181-190.Robocker, W.C. 1970. Seed characteristics and seedling evergence <strong>of</strong> Dalmatian toadflax. Weed Science 18(6):720-725.Robson, D.B., J.D. Knight, R.E. Farrell, and J.J. Germida. 2004. Natural revegetation <strong>of</strong> hydrocarboncontaminatedsoil in semi-arid grasslands. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany.82: 22-30.Robson, S. 2004. Baby’s breath (Gypsophila paniculata). Idaho State University. Available: http://www.cnr.uidaho.edu/range454/2003%20Pet%20weeds/babys_breath.html [January 24, 2005].Rosenstock, S.S. and R. Stevens. 1989. Herbivore effects on seeded alfalfa at four pinyon-juniper sites in centralUtah. Journal <strong>of</strong> Range Management 42: 483-490.Rowe, P. and J.M. Swearingen. 2003. Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata. PCA Alien Plant Working Group.Royer, F., and R. Dickinson. 1999. Weeds <strong>of</strong> the Northern U.S. and Canada. The University <strong>of</strong> Alberta press.434 pp.Russell A. B. 1997. Poisonous plants <strong>of</strong> North Carolina. Department <strong>of</strong> Horticultural Science, North CarolinaState University.Rutledge, C. R., and T. McLendon. 1996. An Assessment <strong>of</strong> Exotic Plant Species <strong>of</strong> Rocky Mountain NationalPark. Department <strong>of</strong> Rangeland Ecosystem Science, Colorado State University. 97 pp. Jamestown, ND:Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/explant/explant.htm (Version 15DEC98).Ryan, P.G., V.R. Smith, and N.J.M. Gremmen. 2003. The distribution and spread <strong>of</strong> alien vascular plants onPrince Edward Island. South African Journal <strong>of</strong> Marine Science 25: 555-562.SAF - Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. 2000. Common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris). Available: http://www.agr.gov.sk.ca/default.asp [April 17, 2006].SAFRR - Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food and Rural Revitalization. 1984. Hemp-nettle (Galeopsis tetrahit).Available: http://www.agr.gov.sk.ca/default.asp [March 15, 2005].SAFRR - Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food and Rural Revitalization. 1984. Hemp-nettle (Galeopsis tetrahit).Available: http://www.agr.gov.sk.ca/default.asp [June 14, 2004].Sagar, G.R. and J.L. Harper. 1964. Plantago major L., P. media L. and P. lanceolata L. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology.52(1): 189-221.Sampson, A.W. and K.W. Parker. 1930. St. Johns-wort on rangelands <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Cali<strong>for</strong>nia AgriculturalExperiment Station Bulletin 503. Berkeley, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. 48 pp.B-169
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147:
Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151:
Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 206 and 207: Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed