Competitive Ability (0–3) 2Black bindweed is able to compete with cultivated crops andother weeds <strong>for</strong> moisture, nutrients, and light (Friesen andShebeski 1960, Welbank 1963, Fabricius and Nalewaja 1968,Royer and Dickinson 1999). In experimental studies blackbindweed appears to be a stronger competitor than Chenopodiumalbum, Polygonum aviculare, P. persicaria, Stellaria media, andCapsella bursa-pastoris (Pavlychenko and Harrington 1934,Welbank 1963).Thicket-<strong>for</strong>ming/Smothering growth <strong>for</strong>m (0–2) 2Black bindweed climbs and smothers other plants and can <strong>for</strong>mdense thickets (Rutledge and McLendon 1996). A density <strong>of</strong>56–215 plants per m² has been observed in a number <strong>of</strong> studies(Friesen and Shebeski 1960)Germination requirements (0–3) 2The germination <strong>of</strong> black bindweed seeds is greater on disturbedsites. The disturbance <strong>of</strong> soils apparently reactivates dormantseeds (Milton et al. 1997). However, germination in undisturbedsoil was also recorded (Roberts and Feast 1973).Other invasive species in the genus (0–3) 3Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. & Zucc., P. perfoliatum L.,P. polystachyum Wallich ex Meisn., and P. sachalinense F. Schmidtex Maxim. are declared noxious weeds in a number <strong>of</strong> Americanstates (USDA, NRSC 2006). Also Polygonum arenastrum Jord.ex Boreau, P. caespitosum Blume, P. aviculare L., P. orientaleL., P. persicaria L., and P. lapathifolium L. are listed as a weedsin PLANTS Database (USDA, NRSC 2006). A number <strong>of</strong>Polygonum species native to North America have a weedy habitand are listed as noxious weeds in some <strong>of</strong> the American states.Although some <strong>of</strong> the recent taxonomic treatments considersthese as a species <strong>of</strong> three different genera: Polygonum, Fallopia,and Persicaria (FNA 1993+), they are closely related taxa and canbe considered as congeneric weeds.Aquatic, wetland or riparian species (0–3) 1Black bindweed is a common weed in cultivated fields, gardens,roadsides, and waste areas. It may be occasionally found on rivergravel bars (Hume et al. 1983).Total <strong>for</strong> Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 16/24Ecological Amplitude and Distribution ScoreHighly domesticated or a weed <strong>of</strong> agriculture (0–4) 4Black bindweed is a serious weed in crops (Friesen and Shabeski1960, Forsberg and Best 1964).Known level <strong>of</strong> impact in natural areas (0–6) 1Black bindweed has invaded natural communities in RockyMountain National Park (J. Conn pers. obs.).Role <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic and natural disturbance in2establishment (0–5)Black bindweed readily established on cultivated fields anddisturbed grounds (Royer and Dickinson 1999, Welsh 1974).However, it is recorded to establish in grasslands with small-scaleanimal disturbances in Germany (Milton et al. 1997).Current global distribution (0–5) 5Black bindweed originated from Eurasia. It has now beenintroduced into Africa, South America, Australia, New Zealand,and Oceania (Hultén 1968, USDA, ARS 2003). It has beencollected from arctic regions in <strong>Alaska</strong> (Hultén 1068, UAM2006).Extent <strong>of</strong> the species U.S. range and/or occurrence <strong>of</strong>5<strong>for</strong>mal state or provincial listing (0–5)Black bindweed is found throughout Canada and the UnitedStates. It is declared noxious in <strong>Alaska</strong>, Alberta, Manitoba,Minnesota, Oklahoma, Quebec, and Saskatchewan (<strong>Alaska</strong>Administrative Code 1987, Rice 2006, Royer and Dickinson1999).Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Amplitude and Distribution 17/25Feasibility <strong>of</strong> ControlScoreSeed banks (0–3) 3Most seeds <strong>of</strong> black bindweed germinate in their first year(Chepil 1946). However, seeds remain viable in the soil <strong>for</strong> upto 40 years (Chippendale and Milton 1934). Viability <strong>of</strong> seedswas 5% after 4.7 years, and
Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. & Zucc. Common name: Japanese knotweed,(Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) R. Decr.)Japanese bambooPolygonum sachalinense F. Schmidt ex Maxim.giant knotweed(Fallopia sachalinensis (F. Schmidt ex Maxim.) R. Decr.)Polygonum ×bohemicumBohemian knotweed( J. Chrtek & Chrtkovß [cuspidatum × sachalinense]) Zika & Jacobson(Fallopia ×bohemica (Chrtek & Chrtková) J.P. Bailey)<strong>Ranking</strong> SummaryEcoregion known or expected to occur inSouth CoastalInterior BorealArctic AlpineYesYesNoPotential Max. ScoreEcological Impact 40 33Biological Characteristics and Dispersal 25 21Amplitude and Distribution 25 23Feasibility <strong>of</strong> Control 7 7Relative Maximum 87Climatic ComparisonCollected in<strong>Alaska</strong> regions?CLIMEXsimilarity?South Coastal Yes –Interior Boreal Yes –Arctic Alpine No NoJapanese knotweed has been collected from Sitka, Anchorage,Juneau, and Port Alexander (Densmore et al. 2001, UAM 2003).Using the CLIMEX matching program, climatic similaritybetween Nome and areas where the species is documented ismodest. It does occur in gardens within Anchorage (UAM 2003),which has 61% climatic match with Nome. However, this speciesranges only as far north as Nova Scotia and Newfoundland inCanada and is restricted to regions <strong>of</strong> high precipitation in theUK (Seiger 1991). In northern Europe it is restricted to areas withgreater than 120 frost-free days (Beerling et al. 1994). Nome has80 frost-free days. This in<strong>for</strong>mation suggests that establishmentin the arctic alpine ecoregion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> is unlikely andestablishment in the interior boreal region may only be possibleunder garden conditions.Ecological ImpactScoreImpact on Ecosystem Processes (0–10) 7Japanese knotweed increases the risk <strong>of</strong> soil erosion followingremoval <strong>of</strong> stands. The dead stems and leaf litter decompose veryslowly and <strong>for</strong>m a deep organic layer which prevents native seedsfrom germinating, altering the natural succession <strong>of</strong> native plantspecies (Japanese Knotweed Alliance 2004, Seiger 1991). Duringdormancy, dried stalks can create a fire hazard (Ahrens 1975).Impact on Natural Community Structure (0–10) 10Japanese knotweed <strong>for</strong>ms an extremely dense mid-canopy layeras a single-species stand, and eliminates plants below by shadingout native vegetation (Seiger 1991, Beerling et al. 1994, MaineNatural Areas Program 2004).Impact on Natural Community Composition (0–10) 9Japanese knotweed prevents native seeds from germinating, andhinders the natural succession <strong>of</strong> native herbs, shrubs, and trees.It reduces species diversity (Seiger 1991, Beerling et al. 1994).Impact on Higher Trophic Levels (0–10) 7Japanese knotweed clogs waterways and lowers the quality <strong>of</strong>habitat <strong>for</strong> wildlife and fish. It reduces the food supply <strong>for</strong> juvenilesalmon in the spring (Seiger 1991). It reduces the diversity <strong>of</strong>phytophagous insects (Beerling & Dawah 1993). Hybridizes withthe introduced Polygonum sachalinense.Total <strong>for</strong> Ecological Impact 33/40Biological Characteristics and Dispersal ScoreMode <strong>of</strong> Reproduction (0–3) 3Reproduction is primarily vegetative [rhizomes and stemtissue] (Japanese Knotweed Alliance 2004). <strong>Plants</strong> can produceabundant seed. But a large proportion is nonviable when fertilemale plants are rare or absent (Conolly 1977). Densmore etal. (2001) observed, however, that the P. cuspidatum in SitkaNational Historical Park appears to have established from seed.Long-distance dispersal (0–3) 2The fragments <strong>of</strong> plants are easily washed downstream wherethey can resprout. There are also documented occurrences <strong>of</strong>spread across sea water (Beerling et al. 1994). Fruits maintaina winged perianth and have an abscission zone on the pediclesuggesting adaptation <strong>for</strong> wind dispersal (Beerling et al. 1994).Spread by humans (0–3) 3Japanese knotweed has been planted as an ornamental insoutheast <strong>Alaska</strong> and in Anchorage and escapes from gardens.Transportation <strong>of</strong> soil containing rhizome fragments is likely tooccur frequently (Seiger 1991, Densmore et al. 2001).Allelopathic (0–2) 0Unknown. No records <strong>of</strong> allelopathy were found. Biochemicalstudies indicate it possesses antibacterial and antifungialproperties, but no mention <strong>of</strong> allelopathic effects (Beerling et al.1994)Competitive Ability (0–3) 3Japanese knotweed effectively competes <strong>for</strong> light by emergingearly in the spring and using its extensive rhizomatous reservesto quickly attain a height <strong>of</strong> 2–3 meters (Densmore et al. 2001,Seiger 1991).Thicket-<strong>for</strong>ming/Smothering growth <strong>for</strong>m (0–2) 2It <strong>for</strong>ms very dense thickets that are generally taller (4–9 feet)than the surrounding herbaceous and shrubby vegetation(Densmore et al. 2001, Seiger 1991, Whitson et al. 2000).Germination requirements (0–3) 2Japanese knotweed can germinate in vegetated areas. Theseeds require chilling to break dormancy (Beerling et al. 1994,Densmore et al. 2001).B-103
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89: Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91: Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101: Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103: Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107: Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113: Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117: Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119: Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121: Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125: Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131: Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133: Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135: Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137: Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 140 and 141: Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147: Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189:
Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191:
Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193:
Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195:
Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197:
Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199:
MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201:
Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203:
Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205:
Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207:
Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209:
Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211:
Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213:
Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215:
Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217:
B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219:
2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220:
4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed