Heffernan, K.E., P.P. Coulling, J.E. Townsend, and C.J. Hutto. 2001. <strong>Ranking</strong> Invasive Exotic Plant Species inVirginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 01–13. Virginia Department <strong>of</strong> Conservation and Recreation,Division <strong>of</strong> Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. 27 pp. plus appendices.Hickman, J.C. The Jepson Manual <strong>of</strong> Higher <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press, Berkeley,Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. 1400 pp.Hébert, M. 2001. Strategic plan <strong>for</strong> noxious and invasive plants management in <strong>Alaska</strong>. Cooperative ExtensionService, University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK. 35 pp plus appendices.Hiebert, R.D. 1997. Prioritizing invasive plants and planning <strong>for</strong> management. In J.O. Luken and J.W. Thieret(eds.) Assessment and Management <strong>of</strong> Plant Invasions. Springere, New York, pp. 195–212.Hiebert, R.D. and J. Stubbendieck. 1993. Handbook <strong>for</strong> <strong>Ranking</strong> Exotic <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>for</strong> Management and Control.Natural Resources Report NPS/NRMWRO/NRR-93/08. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior National ParkService. Natural Resources Publication Office. Denver, Colorado. 29 pp.Hodkinson, D.J. and K. Thompson. 1997. Plant dispersal: The role <strong>of</strong> man. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Ecology 34:1484–1496.Hultén, E. 1968. Flora <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> and Neighboring Territories. Stan<strong>for</strong>d University Press, Stan<strong>for</strong>d, CA. 1008 p.Kolar, C.S. and D.M. Lodge. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology andEvolution 16:199–204.Kriticos, D.J. and R.P. Randall. 2001. A comparison <strong>of</strong> systems to analyze potential weed distributions. In Groves,R.H., F.D. Panetta, and J.G. Virtue (eds.) Weed Risk Assessment. CSIRO Publishing, Collingswood,Australia. pp. 61–79.Lapina, I. and M.L. Carlson. 2004. <strong>Non</strong>-native plant inventories <strong>of</strong> south-central <strong>Alaska</strong>. 30 pp. Report on filewith US Forest Service, State and Private Forestry and <strong>Alaska</strong> Natural Heritage Program.Lawton, J.H. 1998. Small earthquakes in Chile and climate change. Oikos 82: 209–211.Lid, J. and D.T. Lid. 1994. Flora <strong>of</strong> Norway. The Norske Samlaget, Oslo. Pp. 1014.Mack, R.N. 1996. Predicting the identity and fate <strong>of</strong> plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches.Biological Conservation 78: 107–121.Mack, R.N. 2000. Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. BiologicalInvasions 2: 111–122.Mack, R.N. and M. Erneberg. 2002. The United States naturalized flora: largely the product <strong>of</strong> deliberateintroductions. Annals <strong>of</strong> the Missouri Botanical Garden 89: 176–189.Mochalova, O.A. and V.V. Yakubov. 2004. Flora <strong>of</strong> Commander Islands. Vladivostok: Institute <strong>of</strong> Biology andSoil Science. 120 pp. In Russian.Myers, N. 1997. Global biodiversity II: Losses and threats. In G.K. Meffe and C.R. Carroll (eds.). Principles <strong>of</strong>Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Nowacki, G., P. Spencer, M. Fleming, T. Brock and T. Jorgenson. 2001. Unified ecoregions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong>. U.S.Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. Open file-report 02-297. 2 page map.Pheloung, P.C., P.A. Williams, S.R. Halloy. 1999. A weed risk assessment model <strong>for</strong> use as a biosecurity toolevaluating plant introductions. Journal <strong>of</strong> Environmental Management 57: 239–251.Pimentel, D. 2002. Biological Invasions: economic and environmental costs <strong>of</strong> alien plant, animal, and microbespecies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Pimm, S.L. and M.E. Gilpin. 1989. Theoretical issues in conservation biology. In J. Roughgarden, R. May, andS.A. Levin (eds.). Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.22
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, and C. Crabtree. 2005. New technology in invasive plant detection andmanagement. Proceedings from the 6th Annual Statewide Noxious and Invasive <strong>Plants</strong> ManagementWorkshop, Fairbanks, October 2005.Pysek, P. 1997. Clonality and plant invasions: Can a trait make a difference? In H. de Kroon andJ. van Groenendael (eds.) The Ecology and Evolution <strong>of</strong> Clonal <strong>Plants</strong>. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. pp.405–427.Randall, J.M. and M.C. Hoshovsky. 2000. Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s wildland invasive plants. In Bossard, C.C., J.M. Randall,and M.C. Hoshovsky (eds.) Invasive <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s Wildlands. University <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Press,Berkeley, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. pp. 11–27.Rejmanek, M. 1995. What makes a species invasive? In Pysek, P., K. Prach, M. Rejmanek, and P.M. Wade (eds.),Plant Invasions. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague. pp. 3–13.Rejmanek, M. 1996. A theory <strong>of</strong> seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch. Biological Conservation 78: 171–181.Rejmanek, M. 1999. Invasive plant species and invasive ecosystems. In O.T. Sandlund, P.J. Schei, and A. Vilken(eds.) Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 79–102Rejmanek, M. 2001. What tools do we have to detect invasive plant species? In Groves, R.H., F.D. Panetta, andJ.G. Virtue (eds.) Weed Risk Assessment. CSIRO Publishing, Collingswood, Australia. pp. 34–51.Rejmanek, M. and D.M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661.Robertson, M.P., M.H. Villet, D.H.K. Fairbanks, L. Henderson, S.I. Higgins, J.H. H<strong>of</strong>fman, D.C. Le Mairte,A.R. Palmer, I. Riggs, C.M. Shackleton, and H.G. Zimmermann. 2003. A proposed prioritization system <strong>for</strong>the management <strong>of</strong> invasive alien plants in South Africa. South African Journal <strong>of</strong> Science 99: 1–7.Shephard, M. 2004. Status <strong>of</strong> Exotic Invasive Organisms in <strong>Alaska</strong>. http://www.cnipm.org/status<strong>of</strong>invasivesak04.pdf. USDA Forest Service. Anchorage, AK.State <strong>of</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong>. 2004. All Hazard Mitigation Plan. http://www.ak-prepared.com/plans/mitigation/statehazmitplan.htm. Division <strong>of</strong> Homeland Security and Emergency Management, <strong>Alaska</strong>.Stein, B., L. Kutner, and J. Adams. 2000. Precious heritage: The status <strong>of</strong> biodiversity in the United States. Ox<strong>for</strong>dUniversity Press, Ox<strong>for</strong>d.Sutherst, R.W., G.F. Maywald, T. Yonow, and P.M. Stevens. 1999. CLIMEX: predicting the effects <strong>of</strong> climate onplants and animals: User guide. Csiro Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria. 88 p.Taylor, C.M. and A. Hastings. 2005. Allee effects in biological invasions. Ecology Letters 8: 895–908.U.S. Congress, Office <strong>of</strong> Technology Assessment. 1993. Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States.OTA-F-565. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.USDA (United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture), NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 2002. ThePLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA70874-4490 USA.Walker, L.R. and S.D. Smith. 1997. Impacts <strong>of</strong> invasive plants on community and ecosystem properties. InJ.O. Luken and J.W. Thieret (eds.). Assessment and Management <strong>of</strong> Plant Invasions. Springer, New York.Wainger, L.A. and D.M. King. 2001. Priorities <strong>for</strong> weed risk assessment: Using a landscape context to assessindicators <strong>of</strong> functions, services and values. In Groves, R.H., F.D. Panetta, and J.G. Virtue (eds.) Weed RiskAssessment. CSIRO Publishing, Collingswood, Australia. pp. 34–51.23
- Page 1: United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6: IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8: Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10: The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12: While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16: Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18: 2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20: 3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22: obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24: DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25: AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 29: Appendices
- Page 32 and 33: EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35: Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37: EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39: Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41: Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47: Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49: Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51: Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53: Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55: Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57: Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61: Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63: Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67: Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69: Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71: Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73: Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75: Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147:
Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151:
Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157:
Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163:
Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165:
Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167:
Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169:
Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171:
Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177:
Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179:
Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181:
Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183:
Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185:
Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187:
Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189:
Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191:
Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193:
Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195:
Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197:
Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199:
MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201:
Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203:
Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205:
Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 206 and 207:
Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Ha
- Page 208 and 209:
Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211:
Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213:
Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215:
Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217:
B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219:
2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220:
4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed