Saner, M.A., D.R. Clements, M.R. Hall, D.J. Doohan and C.W. Crompton. 1995. The biology <strong>of</strong> Canadianweeds. 105. Linaria vulgaris Mill. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Science 75(2): 525-537.Sarukhan, J. 1974. Studies on plant demography: Ranunculus repens L., R. bulbosus L. and R. acris L.: II.Reproductive strategies and seed population dynamics. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 62(1): 151-177.Sarukhan, J. and J.L. Harper. 1973. Studies on plant demography: Ranunculus repens L., R. bulbosus L. and R.acris L.: population flux and survivorship. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 61(3): 675-716.Sather, N. 1987. Element Stewardship Abstract <strong>for</strong> Bromus inermis Awnless Brome, Smooth Brome. The NatureConservancy. Arlington, VA.Sather, N. 1996. Element Stewardship Abstract <strong>for</strong> Poa pratensis, Poa compressa Kentucky Bluegrass, CanadaBluegrass. The Nature Conservancy. Arlington, VA.Scheiman, D.M., E.K. Bollinger, and D.H. Johnson. 2003. Effects <strong>of</strong> leafy spurge infestation on grassland birds.Journal <strong>of</strong> Wildlife Management 67: 115-121.Schirman, R. 1981. Seed production and spring seedling establishment <strong>of</strong> diffuse and spotted knapweed. J.Range Management 34: 45-47.Schmidt, F.J.W. 1936. Winter food <strong>of</strong> the sharp-tailed grouse and pinnated grouse in Wisconsin. WilsonBulletin September: 186-203.Schneider, E.L. and T. Chaney. 1981. The floral biology <strong>of</strong> Nymphaea odorata (Nymphaeaceae). TheSouthwestern Naturalist 26 (2): 159-165.SE-EPPC – Southeast Exotic Pest Plant Council. 2001. Invasive Exotic Pest <strong>Plants</strong> in Tennessee. Report fromthe Tennessee Exotic Pest Plant Council. Available: http://www.se-eppc.org/states/TN/TNIList.htmlvia the INTERNET. Accessed 2005 March 4.Seiger, L. 1991. Element Stewardship Abstract <strong>for</strong> Polygonum cuspidatum. The Nature Conservancy incollaboration with the International Network <strong>of</strong> Natural Heritage Programs and Conservation DataCenters. Natural Heritage Databases. Arlington, VA.Selleck, G.W., R.T. Coupland, and C. Frankton. 1962. Leafy spurge in Saskatchewan. Ecological Monographs32: 1-29.Shamsi, S.R.A. and F.H. Whitehead. 1974. Comparative eco-physiology <strong>of</strong> Epilobium hirsutum L. and Lythrumsalicaria L. I. General biology, distribution, and germination. J. Ecol. 62:279-290.Shaw R.H. and L.A. Seiger. 2002. Japanese Knotweed – Biological Control <strong>of</strong> Invasive <strong>Plants</strong> in the EasternUnited States. In Van Driesche, R. et al., 2002. Biological Control <strong>of</strong> Invasive <strong>Plants</strong> in the Eastern UnitedStates, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04, 413 pp.Shephard, M. Inventory & Monitoring Coordinator, Southwest <strong>Alaska</strong> Park Network, National Park Service,240 W. 5th Avenue, Anchorage, <strong>Alaska</strong> 99501. Tel (907) 907-644-3681; fax (907) 644-3809 – Pers. comm.Sherwood, L.V. 1945. Field bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis L., root fragments may grow. Journal <strong>of</strong> theAmerican Society <strong>of</strong> Agronomy 37(4): 307-313.Shin, H. and H. Choi. 1998. Taxonomy and distribution <strong>of</strong> Zostera (Zosteraceae) in eastern Asia, with specialreference to Korea. Aquatic Botany 60: 49-66.Sidhu, S.S. 1971. Some aspects <strong>of</strong> the ecology <strong>of</strong> black medick (Medicago lupulina L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University<strong>of</strong> Western Ontario, London, Ontario.Simmonds, N.W. 1945a. Polygonum persicaria L. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 33(1): 121-131.Simmonds, N.W. 1945b. Polygonum lapathifolium L. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 33(1): 132-139.Singh, S. 1925. Interception <strong>of</strong> weeds in imported wheat grain consignments. Annual <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research22(1): 83-87.B-170
Sinha, S., R. Saxena, and S. Singh. 2000. Fluoride removal from water by Hydrilla verticillata (l.f.) Royle and itstoxic effects. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 65: 683-690.Smith, A.E. 1990. Potential allelopathic influence <strong>of</strong> certain pasture weeds. Crop protection 9(6): 410-414.Smith, J.G. 1963. A subalpine grassland seeding trial. Journal <strong>of</strong> Range Management. 16: 208-210.Smith, L.M. and L.T. Kok. 1984. Dispersal <strong>of</strong> musk thistle (Carduus nutans) seeds. Weed science 32: 120-125.Snow, B. and D. Snow. 1988. Birds and berries. A study <strong>of</strong> an ecological interaction. T&AD Poyser, Calton. Pp.56-57.Snyder J.M., UAF Cooperative Extension Service. 2221 E. Northern Lights Blvd. #118 Anchorage, AK 99508-4143 Tel: (907) 786-6310 alt.tel: (907) 743-9448.Snyder, C. and M. Shephard. 2004. Spotted knapweed. United States Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Prepared byForest Service <strong>Alaska</strong> Region. Leaflet R10-TP-125 May 2004.Snyder, S.A. 1992. Elytrigia repens. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, [Online]. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [May 7, 2004].Snyder, S.A. 1992. Phalaris arundinacea. In: Fire Effects In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>System</strong>, [Online]. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2004, May 5].Sobey, D.G. 1981. Biological flora <strong>of</strong> the British Isles. Stellaria media (L.) Vill. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 69: 311-335.Sobey, D.G. and J.B. Kenworthy. 1979. The relationship between herring gulls and the vegetation <strong>of</strong> theirbreeding colonies. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 67(2): 469-496.Southwick, E.E., G.M. Loper and S.E. Sadwick. 1981. Nectar production, composition, energetics andpollinator attractiveness in spring flowers <strong>of</strong> western New York. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 68(7): 994-1002.Sparrow, S.D., V.L. Cochran and E.B. Sparrow. 1993. Herbage yield and nitrogen accumulation by sevenlegume crops on acid and neutral soils in a subarctic environment. Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Plant Science 73:1037-1045.Spellman, B. 2007. Impacts <strong>of</strong> sweetclover on riparian plant communities. 8th Annual Statewide CNIPMWorkshop. Presentation 15 November 2007.Spence, S.K. 1998. Bioassay-directed isolation <strong>of</strong> the allelopathic constituents <strong>of</strong> the aquatic plant Nymphaeaodorata. Dissertation Abstracts International Part B: Science and Engineering 58(10): 4762.Spencer, D.F. and M. Rejmanek. 1989. Propagule type influences competition between two submersed aquaticmacrophytes. Oecologia 81: 132-137.Spencer P., Ecologist, National Park Service, <strong>Alaska</strong> Region - Biological Resources Team, 240 W. 5th Ave, #114,Anchorage, AK 99501 tel: (907) 644-3448 – Pers. com.Spira, T. and L.K. Wagner. 1983. Viability <strong>of</strong> seeds up to 211 years old extracted from adobe brick buildings <strong>of</strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia and Northern Mexico. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany 70(2): 303-307.Stani<strong>for</strong>th, J.G. and P.A. Scott. 1991. Dynamics <strong>of</strong> weed populations in a northern subarctic community.Canadian Journal <strong>of</strong> Botany. 69: 814-821.Stani<strong>for</strong>th, R.J. and P.B. Cavers. 1997. Distribution and habitats <strong>of</strong> four annual smartweeds in Ontario.Canadian Field-Naturalist 93(4): 378-385.Stanton, F. 1974. Wildlife guidelines <strong>for</strong> range fire rehabilitation. Tech. Note 6712. Denver, CO: U.S.Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land Management. 90 p.Starr, F., K. Starr, and L. Loope. 2003. Rubus discolor Himalayan blackberry Rosaceae. <strong>Plants</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hawaii.Available: http://www.hear.org/starr/hiplants/index.html via the INTERNET. Accessed 2003 Feb 07.B-171
- Page 1:
United StatesDepartment ofAgricultu
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionThe control of invasive
- Page 7 and 8:
Overview and aimsThe authors, repre
- Page 9 and 10:
The scoring from each system is ver
- Page 11 and 12:
While the relative ranks of species
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 4. Ranks for Polygonum cuspi
- Page 15 and 16:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3. Potential to be spread by huma
- Page 19 and 20:
3.4. Current global distribution.A
- Page 21 and 22:
obs.), suggesting that establishmen
- Page 23 and 24:
DiscussionThe existing weed risk as
- Page 25 and 26:
AcknowledgementsThe U.S. Forest Ser
- Page 27 and 28:
Prather, T., S. Robins, L. Lake, an
- Page 29:
Appendices
- Page 32 and 33:
EcologicalimpactBiologicalcharacter
- Page 34 and 35:
Appendix A.2.Summary Scores Of Inva
- Page 36 and 37:
EcologicalImpactBiologicalCharacter
- Page 38 and 39:
Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara &
- Page 40 and 41:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 42 and 43:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 44 and 45:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 46 and 47:
Germination requirements (0-3) 2See
- Page 48 and 49:
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.
- Page 50 and 51:
Spread by humans (0-3) 3The Siberia
- Page 52 and 53:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 54 and 55:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 56 and 57:
Centaurea solstitialis L.Ranking Su
- Page 58 and 59:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 60 and 61:
Cirsium vulgare (Savi) TenRanking S
- Page 62 and 63:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Due to i
- Page 64 and 65:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 66 and 67:
Cytisus scoparius (L.) LinkRanking
- Page 68 and 69:
Germination requirements (0-3) 3Orc
- Page 70 and 71:
Digitalis purpurea L.Ranking Summar
- Page 72 and 73:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 74 and 75:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 76 and 77:
Galeopsis bifida Boenn. and G. tetr
- Page 78 and 79:
Extent of the species U.S. range an
- Page 80 and 81:
Heracleum mantegazzianumSommier & L
- Page 82 and 83:
Hesperis matronalis L.Ranking Summa
- Page 84 and 85:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 86 and 87:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 88 and 89:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 90 and 91:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 3Hydrilla
- Page 92 and 93:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 94 and 95:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 96 and 97:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 98 and 99:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 100 and 101:
Leucanthemum vulgare Lam.Ranking Su
- Page 102 and 103:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Dalmatia
- Page 104 and 105:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 106 and 107:
Lonicera tatarica L. common names:
- Page 108 and 109:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 110 and 111:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 112 and 113:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 114 and 115:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 116 and 117:
Melilotus alba MedikusRanking Summa
- Page 118 and 119:
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.Rank
- Page 120 and 121:
Allelopathic (0-2)UThere is no data
- Page 122 and 123:
Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 124 and 125:
Biological Characteristics and Disp
- Page 126 and 127:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 128 and 129:
Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 130 and 131:
Plantago major L.Ranking SummaryEco
- Page 132 and 133:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 1Annual b
- Page 134 and 135:
Poa pratensis ssp. pratensis L.comm
- Page 136 and 137:
Polygonum aviculare L. common names
- Page 138 and 139:
Competitive Ability (0-3) 2Black bi
- Page 140 and 141:
Other invasive species in the genus
- Page 142 and 143:
Known level of impact in natural ar
- Page 144 and 145:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 146 and 147:
Rumex acetosella L.Ranking SummaryE
- Page 148 and 149:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3The
- Page 150 and 151:
Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 152 and 153:
Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 3Ragw
- Page 154 and 155:
Feasibility of ControlScoreSeed ban
- Page 156 and 157: Sonchus arvensis L. common names: f
- Page 158 and 159: Spread by humans (0-3) 3European mo
- Page 160 and 161: Ecological Amplitude and Distributi
- Page 162 and 163: Stellaria media (L.) Vill.Ranking S
- Page 164 and 165: Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinal
- Page 166 and 167: Aquatic, wetland or riparian specie
- Page 168 and 169: Trifolium hybridum L.Ranking Summar
- Page 170 and 171: Current global distribution (0-5) 3
- Page 172 and 173: Long-distance dispersal (0-3) 2The
- Page 174 and 175: Role of anthropogenic and natural d
- Page 176 and 177: Vicia villosa RothRanking SummaryEc
- Page 178 and 179: Current global distribution (0-5) 0
- Page 180 and 181: Anderson, D. Phalaris. In J. C. Hic
- Page 182 and 183: Best, K.F., G.G. Bowes, A.G. Thomas
- Page 184 and 185: Cameron, E. 1935. A study of the na
- Page 186 and 187: Corbin, J.D., M. Thomsen, J. Alexan
- Page 188 and 189: Douglas, G.W. and A. MacKinnon. 199
- Page 190 and 191: Frankton, C. and G.A. Mulligan. 197
- Page 192 and 193: Haggar, R.J. 1979. Competition betw
- Page 194 and 195: Howard, J.L. 2002. Descurainia soph
- Page 196 and 197: Klinkhamer, P.G. and T.J. De Jong.
- Page 198 and 199: MAFF - Ministry of Agriculture, Foo
- Page 200 and 201: Miki, S. 1933. On the sea-grasses i
- Page 202 and 203: Paddock, Raymond, E. III. Environme
- Page 204 and 205: Proctor, V.W. 1968. Long-distance d
- Page 208 and 209: Stebbins, L.G. 1993. Tragopogon: Go
- Page 210 and 211: Townshend, J.L. and T.R. Davidson.
- Page 212 and 213: Washington State Department of Ecol
- Page 214 and 215: Wolfe-Bellin, K.S. and K.A. Moloney
- Page 216 and 217: B. Invasiveness Ranking1. Ecologica
- Page 218 and 219: 2.5. Competitive abilityA. Poor com
- Page 220: 4. Feasibility of Control4.1. Seed