11.07.2015 Views

The Seven Sins of Evolutionary Psychology - Konrad Lorenz Institute

The Seven Sins of Evolutionary Psychology - Konrad Lorenz Institute

The Seven Sins of Evolutionary Psychology - Konrad Lorenz Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Shulamith KreitlerBeliefs about SelfBeliefs about NormsBeliefs about GoalsGeneral BeliefsFigure 2: <strong>The</strong> Behavioral Intent.BehavioralIntentis neutral, a cluster <strong>of</strong> beliefs is formed (‘CO cluster’)orienting toward a particular act. It generates a unifiedtendency orienting toward the performance <strong>of</strong>an action, which is called behavioral intent, and canbe considered as a vector representing the motivationaldisposition towards a given behavior (see Figure2).In many cases the process <strong>of</strong> forming a CO clusteris greatly reduced because there exist in memory almostcomplete CO clusters, formed on the basis <strong>of</strong>past recurrences <strong>of</strong> behaviors in similar situations.<strong>The</strong> meanings <strong>of</strong> the input allow for retrieving suchalmost-complete CO clusters and adapting them tothe present situation by the addition or transformation<strong>of</strong> a few beliefs. In other cases, when there arenot enough beliefs orienting toward the course <strong>of</strong>action in at least two belief types, no CO cluster willbe formed. <strong>The</strong> process will discontinue, especiallyif there are no personally relevant beliefs in the cluster.Similarly, when there is a paucity <strong>of</strong> beliefs <strong>of</strong> acertain type, an incomplete CO cluster will beformed which cannot be acted upon but may be discardedor stored for possible use in another situation.Another resulting possibility is the occurrence <strong>of</strong>conflict (‘intent conflict’) when two CO clusters andconsequently two behavioral intents are formed.Another intriguing possibility consists in the formation<strong>of</strong> an inoperable cluster due to the inclusion <strong>of</strong>‘as if’ beliefs in one or more belief types. If, for example,the ‘as if’ beliefs come to replace other beliefs inthe beliefs about self and general beliefs, we may geta CO cluster orienting toward virtual action such asdaydreaming.<strong>The</strong> fourth stage is initiated by the formation <strong>of</strong> thebehavioral intent, and is focused on the question“how will I do it?” <strong>The</strong> answer is in the form <strong>of</strong> abehavioral program, namely, a hierarchically structuredsequence <strong>of</strong> instructions governing the performance<strong>of</strong> the act, including both the more generalstrategy (‘program scheme’) as well as the more specifictactics (‘operational program’). Previouslyformed habits are major components embedded inthe programs. An important role is attributed to thebehavioral intent at this phase. It guides the selection,retrieval, modification and sometimes construction<strong>of</strong> behavioral programs, and serves as aframe <strong>of</strong> reference for supervising program executionand evaluating outcomes.Different programs are involved in executing anovert molar act, a cognitive act, an emotional response,a daydreamed act, conflict resolution, etc.<strong>The</strong>re appear to be four basic kinds <strong>of</strong> programs: (a)Innately determined programs, which are involvedprimarily in the output on the submolar level, e.g.,those controlling reflexes or classically conditionedresponses; (b) Programs that are partly innate andpartly acquired by learning, e.g., those controllinginstincts (as described by LORENZ 1965, or TINBERGEN1951), behaviors corresponding to defense mechanisms,and language behavior; (c) Programs acquiredthrough learning, e.g., those controlling culturallyshaped behaviors (running elections, etc.),or personal habits (e.g., forms <strong>of</strong> relaxing, makingfriends, arranging one’s cupboard); and (d) Programsconstructed by the individual ad hoc, in linewith situational requirements, <strong>of</strong>ten using existingprogram schemes, including plans for plan construction.Implementing a behavioral intent by a programrequires selecting and retrieving a program, and <strong>of</strong>tenadapting it to prevailing circumstances. A ‘programconflict’ may occur between two equally adequateprograms or between one that is about to beenacted while another is still in operation.<strong>The</strong> retrieval, adaptation and execution <strong>of</strong> theprogram, as well as determination <strong>of</strong> the end-pointin view <strong>of</strong> the behavioral intent also require cognitivecontrol.Major Advantages <strong>of</strong> the CO <strong>The</strong>ory<strong>The</strong> major cited advantages will be considered fromthe perspective <strong>of</strong> the human level, the level forwhich the theory was originally developed and inwhich it was primarily applied. <strong>The</strong> advantages arepartly applied and partly theoretical.<strong>The</strong> major advantage from the applied viewpointis that the CO theory enables predictions <strong>of</strong> behaviorsand changes in behavior by using systematicprocedures.Evolution and Cognition ❘ 86 ❘ 2001, Vol. 7, No. 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!