R E - R E A D E R - Biro Beograd

Recommendations

Info

Social Relevance of Contemporary Anarchism 1 Društvena relevantnost suvremenog anarhizma 1 Marko Strpić Attempts to discuss anarchism or social themes from an anarchist perspective are very rare; especially if these discussions are held in a way that includes the broadest possible public, whether part of the movement or not, and no matter its degree of familiarity with the theme. We could almost speak about anarchism and anarchist ideas finding their entrance into the mainstream, although this distinction between mainstrean and something else (whatever it might be) is rather unclear and a little odd. Discussions about Anarchism as a Way into the Mainstream At the Dom Omladine (Cultural Center DOB) in Belgrade, a series of lectures/panels/presentations under the title Discussions about Anarchism 2 has been initiated. The basic idea is to bring the discussion about anarchism out of the closed circle of insiders and to open it up to a broader group of interested people. On the one hand, this can be seen as an attempt to enter the mainstream, although it is completely undefined where to 1 This article by Marko Strpić has been published at zamirzine.net after his participation in the discussion concerning contemporary tendencies of anarchism in the frame of the Discussions on Anarchism, held on 17 th May 2006 at the Dom Omladine (Cultural Center DOB) in Belgrade, with the speaker: Miša Mašina, Dražen Šimleša and Marko Strpić. (http://www.zamirzine. net/article.php3?id_article=3478) 10 Vrlo su rijetki pokušaji razgovora o anarhizmu ili društvenim temama iz anarhističke perspektive, a da se ti razgovori vode na način da uključuju što širu populaciju, bez obzira na njezinu prethodnu upućenost u temu ili uključenost u pokret. Gotovo da možemo govoriti o ulasku anarhizma i anarhističkih tema u područje mainstreama, iako je posve nejasna i pomalo čudna podjela na mainstream i ono drugo (što god to bilo). Razgovori o anarhizmu kao put u mainstream U beogradskom Domu omladine pokrenuta je serija predavanja/tribina/predstavljanja pod nazivom Razgovori o anarhizmu 2 . Osnovna ideja te serije razgovora je pokušati preseliti diskusiju o anarhizmu iz zatvorenog kruga upućenih i proširiti je na što širi krug zainteresiranih. S jedne strane to je predstavljeno kao pokušaj ulaska u mainstream, iako je posve nejasno gdje se nalazi ta granica između mainstreama i drugog (dva viđenja ovog pitanja možete čitati u tekstovima Margina u središtu i Anarhi- 1 Članak je objavljen nakon gostovanja Marka Strpića u <strong>Beograd</strong>u (http://www.zamirzine.net/article. php3?id_article=3478), a povodom prvog ciklusa Razgovori o anarhizmu održanog u Domu omladine, na temu savremene tendencije u anarhizmu. U razgovoru su učestvovali: Miša Mašina, Dražen Šimleša i Marko Strpić.
draw the border between mainstream and sidestream or marginal (two perspectives on this question can be read in the texts Margina u središtu and Anarhizam izvan logike spektakla). If we talk about society as a whole, any distinction between “main” and “secondary” streams doesn’t mean much, especially in the domain of public activity, agitation and propaganda, which comprise the largest part of anarchist activity. This was exactly the topic raised in a discussion during the anarchist book fair in Zagreb, when the impression emerged that one talks about the anarchist movement as being separated from society. The conclusion was that we can’t look at the movement this way and that the essence of all the work is to be socially, politically, culturally, economically and in every way relevant and present all the time. This can be interpreted as constant presence in what we call the mainstream. We could also call it visibility. Or, a bit more ambitiously, acceptance. And that is what anarchists are longing for – a society in which anarchist ideas and practices are mainstream. Therefore every notion of separation, closing up, ghettoization and avoidance is absolutely inacceptable - at least, if we want to have an impact on society. If we only want to create our tiny paradise to feel 11 zam izvan logike spektakla). Ako govorimo o društvu, onda ono predstavlja jednu cjelinu, pa tako svaka podjela na “glavnu struju” i “sporedne struje” ne znači puno, pogotovo u domeni javnog rada, zagovaranja, propagande, gdje i leži veći dio anarhističke aktivnosti. Tijekom Anarhističkog sajma knjiga u Zagrebu je vođena diskusija koja je dotaknula baš tu temu, zbog povremenog osjećaja da se govori o anarhističkom pokretu kao izdvojenom iz društva. Zaključak je bio da ne možemo na taj način gledati na pokret, te da je bit ukupnog rada biti stalno društveno, politički, kulturno, ekonomski i kako god već relevantan i prisutan. To možemo prevesti kao stalno prisustvo u onome što zovemo mainstream. Isto tako, to možemo zvati vidljivost. Malo ambiciozniji naziv bi bio prihvaćenost. No upravo to je ono što anarhisti žele – društvo u kojem su anarhističke ideje i prakse mainstream, dakle glavna struja. Zato je svaka ideja izdvajanja, zatvaranja, getoiziranja i izbjegavanja posve neprihvatljiva. Barem ako želimo utjecati na društvo. Ako pak želimo stvoriti svoj mali raj u kojem ćemo se osjećati sigurno i zaštićeno od svakog zla, onda je to posve druga stvar. Svakako manje zanimljiva za širi društveni kontekst i sama sebi dovoljna, pa je ovdje neću ni obrađivati 2 Grupa za logističku podršku (Group for Logistical Support or GLP) is a nonformal group founded in February 2006 in Belgrade. In the period of May 2006 - May 2007 the GLP organized 10 discussion events Discussions on Anarchism with local speakers and speakers from Germany, Croatia and Kosovo in Belgrade. Themes were: history of anarchism, feminism, anarcho-syndicalism, postanarchism, anarchism and art, critical media, activism, violent and non violent struggle and self-management in socialist Yugoslavia. Speakers were: Trivo Inđić, Dražen Šimleša, Marko Strpić, Miša Mašina, Vanda Perović, Sanja Petkovska , Milica Gudović, Rudolf Mühland, Petar Atanacković, Ratibor Trivunac, Sezgin Boynik, Tadej Kurepa, Milica Ružičić, Vladan Jeremić, Edgar Buršić, Igor Todorović, Pop (Kontrapunkt), Boris Kanzleiter, Violeta Anđelković, Dragutin Leković, Silke Maier Witt, Sonja Drljević and Dragomir Olujić Oluja. A large number of people participated in these events and involved in the discussions. The recorded audio material can be found at http://glp.anarhija.org.
Page 1: iro beograd RE-READER
Page 4 and 5: Impressum / Impresum Publication /
Page 6 and 7: Contents Sadržaj 10 Social Relevan
Page 9: Group for Logistical podršku Marko
Page 13 and 14: In my view this has to do with the
Page 15 and 16: we can talk then about something th
Page 17 and 18: Feminism and Anarchism 1 Feminizam
Page 19 and 20: all aspects of authority and hierar
Page 21 and 22: erhood, the place where the free de
Page 23 and 24: Erasing of Context Through Hyper-Pr
Page 25 and 26: concept of copyright cannot cope wi
Page 27 and 28: Our ideas are in everybody’s mind
Page 29 and 30: exhibition dedicated to them at thi
Page 31 and 32: himself with theories of postanarch
Page 33 and 34: Anarchopedia didn’t bring anythin
Page 35 and 36: will be better if I’m more often
Page 37 and 38: svetu. Tamo možete da se informiš
Page 39: ActWomanBelgrade activism again st
Page 42 and 43: odnosa dvaju naroda (kako na kolekt
Page 44 and 45: 1997 we had to found a citizen’s
Page 46 and 47: What has all this to do with anarch
Page 48 and 49: Stani Pani Collective 1 Stani Pani
Page 50 and 51: willing to do something, etc..., an
Page 52 and 53: from the whole region. This time it
Page 54 and 55: Slobodnakultura.org 1 Part of an in
Page 56 and 57: Geo-political territory: Where is y
Page 58 and 59: Now, this reminded me of a story I
Page 60 and 61:
create rules to govern their own af
Page 62 and 63:
HOLY DAMN IT! 1 50 000 posters agai
Page 64 and 65:
natural and other resources, even m
Page 66 and 67:
Other Scene Druga scena http://www.
Page 69 and 70:
Copy Me Copyleft copyright debate C
Page 71 and 72:
acknowledged that detournement - pu
Page 73 and 74:
since all copies and derivations mu
Page 75 and 76:
or groups by discriminating against
Page 77 and 78:
Talking about movements, can you de
Page 79 and 80:
This is actually quite funny becaus
Page 81 and 82:
approaches such as Piratbyran’s q
Page 83 and 84:
problem without actually collaborat
Page 85 and 86:
ies of your work, be it by digital
Page 87 and 88:
we started the project the Creative
Page 89 and 90:
cal equivalent, taking place in fil
Page 91 and 92:
The files are already downloaded. T
Page 93 and 94:
Abschiebung Aleksa Golijanin Alexan
Page 95 and 96:
Freiwillige Rückkehr Dobrovoljni p
Page 99 and 100:
Mit welchen Auflagen ist die Duldun
Page 101 and 102:
damit für viele Menschen noch schw
Page 105 and 106:
freiwillige Entscheidung für die M
Page 107 and 108:
zuhause romanes gesprochen und sons
Page 111 and 112:
Neustädte 1 Novi gradovi 1 Intervi
Page 113 and 114:
terhaltung“ gibt. Das liegt nicht
Page 117 and 118:
Aber es ist interessant sich das an
Page 119 and 120:
meine „Lebensqualität“, auch w
Page 121 and 122:
society and a lack of representativ
Page 123 and 124:
The foundation of SLUM-TV SLUM-TV w
Page 125 and 126:
Photo Index Indeks fotografija page
Page 127 and 128:
Publications of Biro Belgrade Izdan
show all

R E - R E A D E R - Biro Beograd

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?