12.07.2015 Views

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

partially based on the flawed notion that an <strong>in</strong>dividual or <strong>in</strong>stitution engag<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g regard<strong>in</strong>g ethics can ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a panoptic perspective,with absolute ability to quantify value and reductively assess consequences,or assume total knowledge regardless <strong>of</strong> cultural context and conditions. Inthe light <strong>of</strong> this, my research sought to resist dichotomis<strong>in</strong>g the ethicalapproach <strong>in</strong>to either <strong>of</strong> these two Western dom<strong>in</strong>ated philosophical traditionsand <strong>in</strong>stead recognised the need <strong>for</strong> embrac<strong>in</strong>g nuance and ambiguity. AsBirch (2002 p.6) notes, dependence on either <strong>of</strong> these traditions may servesignificantly to „mask the complexities <strong>of</strong> ethical considerations that can beencountered <strong>in</strong> qualitative research‟.One <strong>of</strong> the significant attractions <strong>of</strong> align<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d a traditional approach toethics is the provision <strong>of</strong> „a firmly anchored epistemological security fromwhich to venture out and conduct research‟ (England 1994 p.81). Whilstmuch current social research has progressed beyond adherence to traditionalmeta-ethics norms it still ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a widespread tendency to <strong>of</strong>fer nearunanimous perspectives regard<strong>in</strong>g what constitutes appropriate ethicalconduct <strong>in</strong> research. The consequences <strong>of</strong> such epistemological security mayresult <strong>in</strong> a somewhat sterile scenario whereby researchers simply subscribe tothe ethical modus operandi established by predecessors. Throughout myresearch, I was <strong>for</strong>ced to confront such shared assumptions and recognise thelimitations <strong>in</strong>herent with<strong>in</strong> them. In order to illustrate the process <strong>of</strong> do<strong>in</strong>gthis I now outl<strong>in</strong>e the contention with<strong>in</strong> the widely accepted maxims <strong>of</strong>„<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med consent‟ and „do no harm‟.3.7.1 In<strong>for</strong>med consentThe notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>med consent constitutes a central tenet <strong>of</strong> muchparticipant-based ethics amongst social researchers (Hay 1998, Edwards andMauthner 2002), particularly <strong>in</strong> regard to appropriate <strong>in</strong>teraction withchildren and other vulnerable populations (<strong>Holloway</strong> and Valent<strong>in</strong>e 2000,Valent<strong>in</strong>e et al. 2001). The majority <strong>of</strong> debate is framed with<strong>in</strong> well-def<strong>in</strong>edterms with clear emphasis on ensur<strong>in</strong>g rigorous compliance with <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>medconsent guidel<strong>in</strong>es and complete understand<strong>in</strong>g from participants (Miller103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!