12.07.2015 Views

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

„The higher the perceived pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the visitors, the moredifficult it becomes to genu<strong>in</strong>ely observe what is happen<strong>in</strong>g …It was a lot easier to get a sense <strong>of</strong> what happened on a dayto-daybasis when I was just perceived as a „student‟ and noone cared about impress<strong>in</strong>g me … Now, because <strong>of</strong> theassociations, it is much more tricky.‟6.4.5 MethodsExplor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative methodological approaches to monitor<strong>in</strong>g andevaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>ICT</strong> <strong>for</strong> education <strong>in</strong>itiatives was a central objective <strong>of</strong> theresearch, and this was both facilitated and constra<strong>in</strong>ed by operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>partnership. The target audience <strong>for</strong> the outputs, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with thesignificant f<strong>in</strong>ancial consequences <strong>of</strong> deviat<strong>in</strong>g too far from the anticipated<strong>for</strong>mat <strong>of</strong> a conventional evaluation, meant that it was necessary to providethe partner with established research methods to complement the more<strong>in</strong>novative approaches. Understand<strong>in</strong>g that the partner required a certa<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mat <strong>of</strong> evaluation that fitted with<strong>in</strong> their criteria <strong>of</strong> impact <strong>in</strong> order <strong>for</strong> it tobe useful <strong>for</strong> their purposes provided a valuable lesson (Morgan 2004).With<strong>in</strong> this negotiated position there rema<strong>in</strong>ed a vital and regularly utilisedrole with<strong>in</strong> the partnership <strong>for</strong> the academic <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novation and athorough research approach that would ultimately serve to enhancecredibility through rigorous engagement.The necessity <strong>of</strong> this engagement was demonstrated through discussionbetween partners surround<strong>in</strong>g the suitability <strong>of</strong> questions with<strong>in</strong> themonitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation <strong>in</strong>terviews and focus groups. On several occasionsit was necessary to alter proposed questions because they were deemed toopolitically contentious by public sector partners. This was particularlyapparent when <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the value <strong>of</strong> laptops <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia, where theresearch team was prevented from ask<strong>in</strong>g two questions that were consideredtoo explicit. The first <strong>of</strong> these was „is the laptop the most appropriate use <strong>of</strong>money?‟ And the second was „if you had the choice to spend this amount <strong>of</strong>money on anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> your school, would you spend it on laptops?‟242

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!