12.07.2015 Views

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. IntroductionSignificant attention is currently focused on the potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>ICT</strong>s to assist <strong>in</strong>leapfrogg<strong>in</strong>g educational problems with<strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g nations (Pye andStephenson 2003, T<strong>in</strong>io 2003, Leach 2005) and there is much enthusiasm<strong>for</strong> a possible technology-enabled „breakthrough <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g‟ (Wagner 2005ap.6). However, considerable debate surrounds the question <strong>of</strong> whether the<strong>in</strong>fusion <strong>of</strong> technology <strong>in</strong>to education has actually <strong>in</strong>stigated more than<strong>in</strong>cremental changes to the field. Proponents assert that the last decade hasresulted <strong>in</strong> the emergence <strong>of</strong> „a new landscape <strong>for</strong> education‟ (Keats 2005 nopag<strong>in</strong>ation) with technology positively affect<strong>in</strong>g student motivation (<strong>in</strong>foDev2005) and, when implemented with fidelity, lead<strong>in</strong>g to a significant <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g (L<strong>in</strong>den et al. 2003, Lemke and Fadel 2006). This is challengedby sceptics who argue that achiev<strong>in</strong>g structural technological change <strong>in</strong>schools takes far longer than anticipated (Cuban 2001) with no substantialevidence exist<strong>in</strong>g that the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> technology has yet caused anyfundamental changes to education (James and Miller 2005).Establish<strong>in</strong>g which <strong>of</strong> these positions is a more accurate reflection <strong>of</strong> reality,or, more precisely, what are the conditions and contexts with<strong>in</strong> which one orthe other is more likely to occur, is a press<strong>in</strong>g concern. This is because, <strong>in</strong>addition to pedagogical concerns, the use <strong>of</strong> technology <strong>in</strong> education is drivenby substantive economic, political and ideological motivation. Anunderstand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the vary<strong>in</strong>g appropriateness and efficacy <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>gtechnology with<strong>in</strong> education <strong>in</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> has significant and long last<strong>in</strong>gconsequences <strong>for</strong> the way education is undertaken across the cont<strong>in</strong>ent. Thenature <strong>of</strong> these consequences is dependent upon effective monitor<strong>in</strong>g,evaluation and impact assessment.Wagner et al. (2004) note that there have been a variety <strong>of</strong> outcomes from<strong>ICT</strong> <strong>for</strong> education projects, with negative impacts <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the re<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>dependencies, imposition without community <strong>in</strong>volvement and collapse dueto lack <strong>of</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g or political commitment. Due to the rapidly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!