12.07.2015 Views

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tent, human be<strong>in</strong>gs consistently cause harm to one another.One potential approach to avoid<strong>in</strong>g do<strong>in</strong>g any harm is to rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> bed allday and circumvent tak<strong>in</strong>g any action or decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. In do<strong>in</strong>g this onewould successfully avoid <strong>in</strong>flict<strong>in</strong>g much active harm but it would not bepossible to avoid passive harm through acts <strong>of</strong> omission. If the primaryobjective is to „do no harm‟ then the only possible outcome is a bland researchagenda devoid <strong>of</strong> all risk. Social research that is beneficial and progressive<strong>in</strong>corporates an element <strong>of</strong> risk that harm will be done. Despite my convictionthat the overall potential <strong>for</strong> good is greater than the potential <strong>for</strong> harm, thearena <strong>of</strong> <strong>ICT</strong> <strong>for</strong> education is a clear example <strong>of</strong> such risk-filled research, aswas considered <strong>in</strong> the theoretical context, Chapter 2.A useful recognition that harm may result from research is very differentfrom explicitly <strong>in</strong>tend<strong>in</strong>g to cause harm, although this too is theoreticallyexcusable on utilitarian grounds. I never attempted to cause harm throughmy research but it is undoubted that <strong>in</strong>advertent yet considerable harm mayhave been done to many <strong>in</strong>dividuals as a result <strong>of</strong> the activities undertaken.At various junctures decisions and <strong>in</strong>teractions may have unavoidably and<strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>visibly caused harm, <strong>of</strong>fence, marg<strong>in</strong>alisation and the re<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>power <strong>in</strong>equalities. This should be acknowledged as an unavoidable realityrather than obscured under pseudo-protective codes and maxims. In the light<strong>of</strong> this, it is appropriate to employ a thoughtful consequentialist approach <strong>of</strong>risk and benefit analysis, aware <strong>of</strong> mixed consequences and un<strong>for</strong>eseeableimpacts but conv<strong>in</strong>ced that with<strong>in</strong> these parameters the research is caus<strong>in</strong>gor at least contribut<strong>in</strong>g to a greater level <strong>of</strong> good than harm.If governed by the Hippocratic maxim, then it would be impossible to engagewith a sphere <strong>of</strong> research so ambiguous and contested as <strong>ICT</strong> <strong>for</strong> education.As discussed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2, engag<strong>in</strong>g with the use <strong>of</strong> technology <strong>in</strong>development <strong>in</strong> general, and education more specifically, is an arena <strong>in</strong> whichresearch has significant potential to cause real harm, both at an <strong>in</strong>dividualand societal level. It is plausible that the research undertaken <strong>for</strong> this thesiswill <strong>in</strong>stigate local empowerment, improved educational outcomes andcapacity enhancement through engag<strong>in</strong>g with the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong>106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!