12.07.2015 Views

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

education context are usefully illustrated by the debate between Helmreich(1999) and Lans<strong>in</strong>g (2000) centred on digital technology and water.Advocates <strong>for</strong> critical engagement (Feenberg and Hannay 1995, Vogel 1995)dismiss the assumption that technology has autonomous and staticfunctional logic as determ<strong>in</strong>istic, fatalistic, and <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g „only condemnation<strong>of</strong> the present and no guidance <strong>for</strong> the future‟ (Feenberg 1999 p.193).Arguments that position technology as the primary structure <strong>of</strong> society (Ellul1964) can be simply contested on the basis that technology, <strong>in</strong> itself, isambivalent. Put simply, technology can be used either to serve the <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong>those <strong>in</strong> power or to trans<strong>for</strong>m the nature <strong>of</strong> power relationships (Castells2000). Emphasis<strong>in</strong>g the „malleability <strong>of</strong> technology‟ challenges the Marcusiandichotomy and recognises the potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>cremental change, diversity andchoice as well as complete paradigm shift. Thus technology is positioned assubservient to people and as a potential element <strong>of</strong> both liberation andsubjugation (Vogel 1995).Feenberg (1995 p.20) makes the important po<strong>in</strong>t that although a dom<strong>in</strong>antexperience <strong>of</strong> recent history has been the use <strong>of</strong> technology <strong>in</strong> h<strong>in</strong>der<strong>in</strong>gparticipatory democracy, it is <strong>for</strong>eseeable that „technology can support morethan one type <strong>of</strong> technological civilisation, and may someday be <strong>in</strong>corporated<strong>in</strong>to a more democratic society than ours‟. Castells (2000 p.20) re<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>cesthis stance with<strong>in</strong> the specific context <strong>of</strong> current <strong>ICT</strong>, po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to itsemancipatory and trans<strong>for</strong>mative potential, serv<strong>in</strong>g to enliven democracy,create networks and redef<strong>in</strong>e power to the po<strong>in</strong>t where „the power <strong>of</strong> flowstakes precedence over the flows <strong>of</strong> power‟. Indeed, potential <strong>in</strong>dications <strong>of</strong>this are found <strong>in</strong> participatory web-based technologies such as blogg<strong>in</strong>g andtwitter and I return to discuss these later <strong>in</strong> this chapter.Offer<strong>in</strong>g practical steps towards a view <strong>of</strong> technology that could help br<strong>in</strong>gabout such a trans<strong>for</strong>med society is dependent upon hold<strong>in</strong>g lightly to theseabstract reflections and engag<strong>in</strong>g with the practical implications <strong>of</strong> rapidlyshift<strong>in</strong>g, technology-<strong>in</strong>duced, time-space <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> both developed anddevelop<strong>in</strong>g contexts. Once it is recognised that the application <strong>of</strong> technology36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!