12.07.2015 Views

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

improve and build capacity. Similarly, the potential <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g andevaluation as a tool <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g motivation regard<strong>in</strong>g the programme wasdemonstrated <strong>in</strong> conversation with teachers at Mb<strong>in</strong>zi (15/11/07) where onereported how the expectation <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed monitor<strong>in</strong>g visits served to<strong>in</strong>crease student attentiveness:„Know<strong>in</strong>g that you will come aga<strong>in</strong> and ask the children morequestions will make them more attentive: they will all belisten<strong>in</strong>g now. The ones who did not get a chance to talk to youtoday were not happy.‟This demonstrates how monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation visits had become anevent welcomed by teachers rather than be<strong>in</strong>g viewed as an externalimposition because they served as an <strong>in</strong>centive <strong>for</strong> the children to workharder <strong>in</strong> class. Instead <strong>of</strong> simply attempt<strong>in</strong>g to „lighten the load‟ <strong>of</strong>monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation <strong>for</strong> the recipients, monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation cancease to be a burden, however heavy or light, and <strong>in</strong>stead be viewed as auseful tool that assists <strong>in</strong> facilitat<strong>in</strong>g the development <strong>of</strong> the programmeconcerned (Alexander 2008).The <strong>in</strong>tention <strong>in</strong> highlight<strong>in</strong>g the capacity development aspect <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>gand evaluation is not to negate the necessary accountability mechanisms thatrema<strong>in</strong> central to assess<strong>in</strong>g such development programmes. Nor is it todownplay the frequent challenge <strong>of</strong> conflicted <strong>in</strong>terest between donor andrecipient. Instead it is to demonstrate how, with<strong>in</strong> and alongside the process<strong>of</strong> programme assessment, it is possible to create a culture wherestakeholders welcome external <strong>in</strong>put and assessment exercises are structuredso as to leave room <strong>for</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> lessons learnt <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>gappropriate adjustments throughout the process <strong>of</strong> the programme lifecyclerather than only at its conclusion (Kozma and Wagner 2005, Watson 2006).This is particularly pert<strong>in</strong>ent with<strong>in</strong> contexts such as my field research <strong>in</strong>Malawi and Ethiopia, where the monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation was conducted <strong>in</strong>conjunction with the implementation process. In such <strong>in</strong>stances the datacollated, alongside be<strong>in</strong>g useful <strong>for</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>al report, provided cont<strong>in</strong>ualfeedback to shape and ref<strong>in</strong>e the ongo<strong>in</strong>g implementation process. This leads211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!