12.07.2015 Views

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

Evaluating ICT for Education in Africa - Royal Holloway, University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eferr<strong>in</strong>g back to previous experiences and comments to helpthem assess and discuss and become more responsive.‟There is there<strong>for</strong>e benefit <strong>in</strong> ensur<strong>in</strong>g that each stakeholder has ownership <strong>of</strong>the process tak<strong>in</strong>g place (Unw<strong>in</strong> and Day 2005, Taachi et al. 2009a).Alongside this, if such monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation is built <strong>in</strong> as an essentialcomponent with<strong>in</strong> programme development then it becomes a tool <strong>for</strong>capacity development through mutual learn<strong>in</strong>g (Lennie et al. 2008).This recognises the necessity <strong>for</strong> focus<strong>in</strong>g on tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> staff and humancapacity development through the process <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g and evaluation(Batchelor et al. 2003), requir<strong>in</strong>g an acknowledgement that manyparticipants are likely to have „little experience <strong>of</strong> such work, and it is crucialthat simple but effective schemes are developed to enable them to contributeto, and benefit from, such activities‟ (Unw<strong>in</strong> 2005 p.84). This is <strong>in</strong> contrast tothe orthodox „heavy burdens <strong>of</strong> report<strong>in</strong>g‟ (Commission <strong>for</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> 2005p.147) approach that may detract from the participant‟s ability to do the veryth<strong>in</strong>g that they are be<strong>in</strong>g evaluated concern<strong>in</strong>g (Watson 2006).5.4.5 Susta<strong>in</strong>ed prob<strong>in</strong>gThe importance <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed prob<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> effective monitor<strong>in</strong>g andevaluation became apparent when question<strong>in</strong>g stakeholders regard<strong>in</strong>g theevaluation <strong>of</strong> the evaluation process. With<strong>in</strong> this context it was regularlyapparent that teachers and other participants had only a limited grasp <strong>of</strong> theobjective <strong>of</strong> the study, despite our ef<strong>for</strong>ts to <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>m them about it. This isunsurpris<strong>in</strong>g consider<strong>in</strong>g the abstract nature <strong>of</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the process <strong>of</strong>programme evaluation. The most significant challenge encountered was <strong>in</strong>help<strong>in</strong>g the teachers reflect critically on what had happened as a result <strong>of</strong> theevaluation rather than simply provid<strong>in</strong>g default answers concern<strong>in</strong>g thepositive impact <strong>of</strong> the programme. This was demonstrated at Ntentera whenthe teachers were asked to reflect on the methods used. The <strong>in</strong>itial response(07/03/08) was exemplified by one teacher, opt<strong>in</strong>g to focus on theprogramme itself:203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!