12.07.2015 Views

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

150Forty liters of flot<strong>at</strong>ion samples were collected from four circa 1800 fe<strong>at</strong>ures (Table 14). Thesefe<strong>at</strong>ures d<strong>at</strong>ed to the l<strong>at</strong>e 18 th and early19 th centuries. The macroplant assemblage from thesefe<strong>at</strong>ures consisted of 16.25 grams of wood charcoal (0.41 gm/L), 1 maize cupule, 2 commonbean seeds, 2 probable whe<strong>at</strong> grains, 15 hickory shell fragments, 2 indetermin<strong>at</strong>e hickory/walnutshell fragments, 4 acorn shell fragments, and six other seeds (2 bayberry, 2 bedstraw, 4unidentifiable). The 75 percent ubiquity of hickory/walnut and 50 percent ubiquity of acornshighlighted the continued importance of mast g<strong>at</strong>hering to the Yauhannah Bluff inhabitants. Theidentific<strong>at</strong>ion of three field crops (maize, beans, whe<strong>at</strong>) indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> agricultural fields werepresent in the site vicinity.Twenty liters of flot<strong>at</strong>ion samples were collected from two 19 th -century fe<strong>at</strong>ures (Table 13). One19 th -century hearth d<strong>at</strong>ed to the first half of the century. An indetermin<strong>at</strong>e pit d<strong>at</strong>ed to the lastquarter of the 19 th century. The macroplant assemblage from these fe<strong>at</strong>ures consisted of 31.84grams of wood charcoal (1.13 gm/L in the hearth and 1.15 gm/L in the pit), 2 fragments of blackwalnut shell, and 6 indetermin<strong>at</strong>e hickory/walnut shell fragments. The recovery of mast indic<strong>at</strong>esthe continued importance of nut crops throughout the historic occup<strong>at</strong>ion of Yauhannah Bluff.Fifty liters of flot<strong>at</strong>ion samples were collected from five indetermin<strong>at</strong>e 18 th /19 th -century fe<strong>at</strong>ures(Table 14). These fe<strong>at</strong>ures included three postholes, a builder’s trench, and a clay extraction pit.The macroplant assemblage from these fe<strong>at</strong>ures consisted of 34.11 grams of wood charcoal (0.68gm/L), 9 maize cupules, 1 maize kernel, 1 hickory shell fragment, 7 indetermin<strong>at</strong>e hickory/walnutshell fragments, and eight other seeds (2 bedstraw, 1 composite, 1 dock, 1 peach, 1 spurge, 2unidentifiable). The 60 percent ubiquity of hickory/walnut shell and maize lends further support toour contention th<strong>at</strong> mast was an important food and points to the presence of fields in the locality.Assemblage CompositionThis section presents a discussion of the condiments, domestic<strong>at</strong>ed vegetables, nutshell fragments,fruits, and herbaceous plants recovered from the Historic Period Yauhannah Bluff site fe<strong>at</strong>ures. Theidentified seed taxa are broken into six broad c<strong>at</strong>egories based on their presumed economicimportance. These are condiments, fruits, vegetables, nut-bearing shade trees, edible herbaceousplants, and herbaceous weeds and grasses. Three plant c<strong>at</strong>egories (fruits, vegetables, nuts)represent definite economically important plants. As has already been discussed, the condimentsand edible herbs may represent either remnants of food remains or accidentally carbonizedn<strong>at</strong>urally deposited seed rain. The herbaceous weeds and grasses probably represent n<strong>at</strong>urallydeposited yard weeds. The numbers, distribution, uses, and n<strong>at</strong>ural environments of each planttaxon are discussed in this section.CondimentsTwo possible condiments, bayberry and sage, were identified in the 18 th century macroplantassemblage (Table 16). These spices were popular seasonings in the 1700s, but both taxa arealso common wild plants in the South Carolina low country. Both taxa were also used asmedicines, and wax was commonly extracted from bayberry (also know as waxmyrtle) berries tomake candles. These plants, if they do not document garden and yard plantings, indic<strong>at</strong>e n<strong>at</strong>urallyoccurring plants in the site vicinity th<strong>at</strong> were available for the 18 th century resident’s use.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!