12.07.2015 Views

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT YOURHANEY PLANTATION41Pottery was to be compared to the colonoware collection to determine if there is N<strong>at</strong>ive Americaninfluence in the production of early colonowares. Both colonoware and possible N<strong>at</strong>ive Americanpottery were characterized by paste, temper, surface tre<strong>at</strong>ment, and thickness. Sherd too small toanalyze in any depth were characterized in the inventory as “residual”. The characteriz<strong>at</strong>ion ofhistoric N<strong>at</strong>ive American pottery is very important since so little is known about the ceramics of thistime period.We also used Stanley South’s (1977) artifact p<strong>at</strong>terning technique and mean ceramic d<strong>at</strong>ing toexamine the site. In addition, if appropri<strong>at</strong>e, we used a method developed by Bartovic (1981) tolook <strong>at</strong> ceramic probability contributions through time. This method is sometimes useful todetermine periods of intensive use and periods of abandonment <strong>at</strong> historic sites. This may be ableto help determine if there is an early occup<strong>at</strong>ion (possible trading post), followed by siteabandonment, followed by plant<strong>at</strong>ion occup<strong>at</strong>ion.The primary objectives of the faunal, pollen, and ethnobotanical analysis were to examine plantand animal use, refuse disposal p<strong>at</strong>terns, local environment, and veget<strong>at</strong>ion as they are manifestedin the fe<strong>at</strong>ures exposed during Phase III d<strong>at</strong>a recovery. This should enable us to gain a perspectiveon subsistence p<strong>at</strong>terns and land use practices of the inhabitants. Key subsistence analysisresearch questions are the following:ooooDo the macroplant and faunal assemblages offer evidence of the economic st<strong>at</strong>usof the residents?Does the macroplant assemblage provide evidence of home gardening, g<strong>at</strong>heringof locally available wild plants on the lots, and/or ornamental plantings on thelots? Was me<strong>at</strong> consumed <strong>at</strong> the site wild or domestic? Did it representpurchased foods from the markets, or was subsistence primarily self sufficient?Do the macroplant, faunal, and palynological assemblages offer evidence of wh<strong>at</strong>the local environment was like?Does the wood charcoal assemblage offer evidence of fuel-use practices, preferredbuilding m<strong>at</strong>erials, and/or past forest composition?Oxidized carbon r<strong>at</strong>io (OCR) samples were taken from numerous fe<strong>at</strong>ures and from several nonfe<strong>at</strong>ureareas. New South had recently used this method <strong>at</strong> a l<strong>at</strong>e historic site near Augusta,Georgia with excellent results (Adams et al. 2004). Fe<strong>at</strong>ures yielded d<strong>at</strong>es ranging from 1909 to1969. The site was historically known to have been occupied from about 1870 to the mid 1960s.Given the potential for an ephemeral short-term occup<strong>at</strong>ion of a trading post, it is possible th<strong>at</strong>OCR d<strong>at</strong>ing can provide much more solid evidence than ceramic or pipe stem d<strong>at</strong>ing for or against<strong>38GE18</strong> being the loc<strong>at</strong>ion of W<strong>at</strong>ie’s trading post.CURATIONAll artifacts and soil samples recovered from the site were returned to the New South Associ<strong>at</strong>es’labor<strong>at</strong>ory where they were washed and c<strong>at</strong>alogued.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!