12.07.2015 Views

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT YOURHANEY PLANTATION65A large quantity of prehistoric artifacts were also recovered from the fe<strong>at</strong>ure, which may indic<strong>at</strong>eth<strong>at</strong> the fe<strong>at</strong>ure was backfilled r<strong>at</strong>her than allowed to fill up through time. The 211 prehistoricsherds are summarized below in Table 2. Sherds were Early Woodland to Mississippian Period.149 lithic artifacts are shown in Table 3. None of the debitage was diagnostic.The fe<strong>at</strong>ure is unusual in th<strong>at</strong> it is rel<strong>at</strong>ively large, straight sided, and fl<strong>at</strong> bottomed. It is also quiteshallow. Assuming the overbearing top soil was one foot deep in this loc<strong>at</strong>ion, the maximum depthis only 1.4 feet below n<strong>at</strong>ural ground surface. It is possible th<strong>at</strong> it is a root or storage pit. Wh<strong>at</strong>was interpreted to be a root pit <strong>at</strong> a tar kiln camp <strong>at</strong> the 18 th Neale Plant<strong>at</strong>ion in Columbus County,North Carolina was approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 8 by 4 feet and perhaps about 2.5 feet <strong>at</strong> its maximum depth(Adams 1998). At a postbellum tenant farming complex near Hephzibah, Georgia, a roughlyrectangular yard root cellar was found th<strong>at</strong> measured approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 11 by 7 feet and extendedapproxim<strong>at</strong>ely 2.4 feet from the original ground surface (Adams et al. 2005). A squarish yard rootcellar <strong>at</strong> a tenant site on the Savannah River site has been found th<strong>at</strong> measured 4 by 5.25 feet andextended about 2.2 feet below the original ground surface (Crass and Brooks 1995).It appears th<strong>at</strong> the root pit was loc<strong>at</strong>ed in the yard, was filled in, and a l<strong>at</strong>er structure (Structure 4)was built on this spot, which intruded into the fe<strong>at</strong>ure. This structure will be discussed in a l<strong>at</strong>ersection of the report.FEATURE 25 – PREHISTORIC PITFe<strong>at</strong>ure 25 is an oval shaped pit measuring 1.8 by 1.4 feet in size and extending 0.3 feet intosubsoil. The fill consists of brown (10YR4/3) loamy sand. Artifacts consisted of one residualsherd, one plain Wilmington/Hanover grog tempered sherd, one medium sand and grogWilmington/Hanover cord marked sherd, and one Thoms Creek fine sand tempered plain sherd.No lithic debitage was recovered from this fe<strong>at</strong>ure.FEATURE 26 – PREHISTORIC POSTFe<strong>at</strong>ure 26 is a circular post measuring 0.5 feet in diameter and extending 0.5 feet into subsoil.The fill consisted of dark grayish brown (10YR3/2) loamy sand. Only one artifact was recoveredfrom this fe<strong>at</strong>ure, which consisted of a plain Thoms Creek fine sand tempered sherd.FEATURE 29 – HISTORIC POSTFe<strong>at</strong>ure 29 is a square post measuring 0.6 by 0.6 feet in size and extending 0.4 feet into thesubsoil. It contained a post hole and mold. The post hole contained brown (10YR5/4) loamysand, mottled with brown (10YR4/3) loamy sand, which was the color of the mold. Two plain andone simple stamped or incised fine sand tempered wares and one residual sherd was recoveredfrom this fe<strong>at</strong>ure. These are believed to be Thoms Creek. However, in addition to these prehistoricsherds, one fragment of clear lead glass was also recovered. An OCR d<strong>at</strong>e of 1766 was obtainedfrom this fe<strong>at</strong>ure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!