12.07.2015 Views

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

156Dock was used to make poultices and to tre<strong>at</strong> ringworm (Krochmal and Krochmal 1973). Medicalinterest in dock diminished rapidly in the 20 th century (Crellin and Philpott 1989).Non-Economic Herbaceous WeedsTwo seeds from two probable non-economic herbaceous weeds (spurge, composite family) werefound in the Yauhannah Bluff flo<strong>at</strong>ed fe<strong>at</strong>ures (Table 13). Spurge, which was found in a singlefe<strong>at</strong>ure (Fe<strong>at</strong>ure 284), is a weedy species with no recorded economic value. It is an adventiveweed th<strong>at</strong> favors disturbed habit<strong>at</strong>s and th<strong>at</strong> grows abundantly around human habit<strong>at</strong>ions and inagricultural fields (Cox 1985; Radford et al. 1968). These plants are interpreted as probableyardweeds with no economic value. Although these plants probably served no economic functionand therefore are not directly rel<strong>at</strong>ed to human activities, their occurrence is an indic<strong>at</strong>or ofdisturbance in the site vicinity.The spurges, Euphorbia sp., are a large family of annual and perennial herbaceous herbs andshrubs. Spurge fruits are available for harvest in the spring and summer months (Cox 1985;Radford et al 1968). This genus is distributed throughout the United St<strong>at</strong>es; Cox (1985) records sixspecies as n<strong>at</strong>ives of the northeastern United St<strong>at</strong>es. Radford et al. (1968) discuss 20 species th<strong>at</strong>are found in the southern st<strong>at</strong>es. Several varieties of spurge are documented by Favretti andFavretti (1990) and Leighton (1987) as l<strong>at</strong>e 18 th and 19 th -century ornamental flowers (Euphorbial<strong>at</strong>hyrus, E. margin<strong>at</strong>a, E. coroll<strong>at</strong>a, E. varieg<strong>at</strong>a). Three of these ornamentals have escapedcultiv<strong>at</strong>ion (Euphorbia l<strong>at</strong>hyrus, E. margin<strong>at</strong>a, E. coroll<strong>at</strong>a, E. varieg<strong>at</strong>a), and two, Euphorbial<strong>at</strong>hyrus and Euphorbia coroll<strong>at</strong>a, are widely n<strong>at</strong>uralized weeds in the eastern United St<strong>at</strong>es.Spurges are a widely distributed n<strong>at</strong>urally occurring weed th<strong>at</strong> is commonly associ<strong>at</strong>ed withdisturbed habit<strong>at</strong>s such as yards, roadsides, and farm fields (Cox 1985; Radford et al 1968).Some species of Euphorbia were utilized as medicinal home remedies in the 19 th century. Twovarieties of spurge, Euphorbia coroll<strong>at</strong>a (flowering spurge) and Euphorbia macul<strong>at</strong>a (spottedspurge), are recorded as medicinal herbs th<strong>at</strong> were utilized in the first half of the 19 th century as alax<strong>at</strong>ive and emetic (Crellin and Philpott 1989; Krochmal and Krochmal 1973). Spurge wasprescribed in the same fashion as milkweed (Asclepias sp.). Parke-Davis marketed a prepar<strong>at</strong>ionof spurge as a lax<strong>at</strong>ive in 1900. According to Crellin and Philpott (1989), spurge was lesspopular than other lax<strong>at</strong>ives, and was primarily resorted to as a last resort after other lax<strong>at</strong>ives hadproven ineffective.WOOD CHARCOAL ANALYSISWood byproducts recovered by Phase III flot<strong>at</strong>ion of Early Woodland Period through Early 20 thCentury fe<strong>at</strong>ure deposits consisted of 139.27 grams of gre<strong>at</strong>er than 2.0 mm wood charcoalfragments and 10.98 grams of resin (Tables 14-15). The identified wood charcoal assemblageprovided important insights into fuel use, building m<strong>at</strong>erials, and indic<strong>at</strong>ion of past forestcomposition. Identific<strong>at</strong>ions were <strong>at</strong>tempted on 419 pieces of wood charcoal, with the identifiedfragments placed into 12 c<strong>at</strong>egories. These c<strong>at</strong>egories consisted of indetermin<strong>at</strong>e hardwood,indetermin<strong>at</strong>e monocot, pine, and eight specifically identified hardwood taxa (Tables 17-18). Thewood charcoal assemblage was well preserved; 93 percent of the identified wood fragments werespecifically identifiable. Thirty of the fragments were either too small or distorted to identify beyondthe more general c<strong>at</strong>egory of indetermin<strong>at</strong>e hardwood.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!