Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

viFigure 51. Magnetic north view of chimney base at Structure 2, with clay extraction pit (Feature 208) inthe background. ................................................................................................................. 200Figure 52. A) Reconstructed view of a house described in a late 17 th century pamphlet entitled Informationand Direction to Such Personas as are inclined to America (in Carson et al. 1988); B)Reconstruction of a house on the Godiah Spray Plantation in Maryland (Montgomery CountyPublic Schools 2001).......................................................................................................... 201Figure 53. Magnetic South view of excavated posts for a Portion of Structure 4. .................................... 205Figure 54. Architectural artifacts from 38GE18. ................................................................................... 210Figure 55. Other historic artifacts from 38GE18................................................................................... 211Figure 56. Thoms Creek and Deptford potteries.................................................................................... 215Figure 57. Mount Pleasant, Hanover/Wilmington, and Santee/McCellanville Potteries. ......................... 217Figure 58. Pee Dee and possible Ashley Wares. .................................................................................. 219Figure 59. Large Pee Dee Vessel fragment from Feature 15................................................................... 220Figure 60. Lithic Raw Material Sources in South Carolina (from Anderson et al. 1982)........................... 225Figure 61. Projectile Points and Bifacial Tools....................................................................................... 228
ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT YOURHANEY PLANTATIONviiLIST OF TABLESTable 1. Summary of Features. .............................................................................................................. 54Table 2. Prehistoric Ceramics from Feature 24. ...................................................................................... 66Table 3. Lithic Debitage from Feature 24................................................................................................ 66Table 4. Artifacts recovered from Feature 50.......................................................................................... 72Table 5. Artifacts recovered from Feature 119........................................................................................ 88Table 6. Datable Historic Ceramic from Feature 208. ........................................................................... 106Table 7. Undatable imported ceramics from Feature 208...................................................................... 107Table 8. Nails from Feature 208.......................................................................................................... 108Table 9. Pipestems from 38GE18, Feature 208.................................................................................... 109Table 10 Prehistoric sherds from Feature 208........................................................................................ 110Table 11. Lithic debitage from Feature 208.......................................................................................... 110Table 12. OCR dates compared to Mean Ceramic Dates (MCDs) and known date ranges for diagnosticpotteries (dates from Trinkley 1990 and Anderson et al. 1989). ........................................... 126Table 13. Common Names, Latin Nomenclature, and Economic Uses of Macroplant Assemblage. ......... 133Table 14. Sample Volume, Wood Charcoal Weights, Mast Counts and Weights, Domesticated CropCounts and Weights........................................................................................................... 134Table 15. Total Counts and Weights, Densities, and Ratios of Wood Byproducts, Mast, and Maize. ...... 136Table 16. Recovered Condiments, Fruits, Edible Herbs, and Weeds. ..................................................... 138Table 17. Identified Wood Charcoal. .................................................................................................. 139Table 18. Relative Proportions of Identified Wood Charcoal. ................................................................ 141Table 19. Burning Characteristics of Common Woods.......................................................................... 143Table 20. Datable Euro/Euro-American Ceramics and Mean Ceramic Date........................................... 180Table 21. Undatable European/Euro-American Ceramics. .................................................................... 181Table 22. Summary of Dating Information. ........................................................................................... 184Table 23. Comparison of ceramic types at various South Carolina plantations....................................... 187Table 24. Market and Village Colonoware Attributes (from Joseph 2004). ............................................ 190Table 25. Attributes of Yauhannah Bluff colonowares using Joseph’s (2004) categories. ........................ 191Table 26. Features with Lesesne Pottery................................................................................................ 194Table 27. Bottle glass and other kitchen group artifacts from 38GE18................................................... 196Table 28. Nail Sizes from 38GE18. .................................................................................................... 197Table 29. Proportions of nails used for different functions...................................................................... 197Table 30. MCD for Features Associated with Structure 2 (excluding Feature 208). ................................. 202Table 31. Mean Ceramic Date for Yard Features Associated with Structure 3 ........................................ 204Table 32. Mean Ceramic Date for Yard Features Associated with Structure 3, excluding possibly intrusivewhiteware.......................................................................................................................... 204Table 33. Mean Ceramic Date for Features Associated with Structure 4................................................. 205Table 34. Mean Ceramic Date for Features Associated with Structure 5................................................. 206Table 35. Pipestem diameters from 38GE18. ....................................................................................... 207Table 36. Published Artifact Patterns compared to 38GE18. ................................................................. 212Table 37. Prehistoric Ceramics from 38GE18. ..................................................................................... 213Table 38. Lithic Debitage from 38GE18............................................................................................... 224Table 39. Attributes of Projectile Points from 38GE18........................................................................... 226Table 40. Summary of Structures at 38GE18. ...................................................................................... 229
Page 4 and 5: iiThis reports provides a thorough
Page 10 and 11: viiiLIST OF ACRONYMS ANDABBREVIATIO
Page 13 and 14: ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT YO
Page 31 and 32: Figure 4Barnwell-Hammerton Map of 1
Page 35 and 36: SettlementFigure 51754 plat of Will
Page 38 and 39: 26Figure 7Faden’s 1780 Edition of
Page 40 and 41: 28Figure 9Mills’ Atlas Showing th
Page 42 and 43: 30Their brother Charles C. P. Alsto
Page 44 and 45: 32At the time of the Civil War, the
Page 46 and 47: Figure 101925 Plat of Yauhannah Blu
Page 57 and 58:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT YO
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 12Electromagnetic Anomaly Ma
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 17Distribution of wrought na
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 23. Plan Drawing of Area BAR
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139:
Page 142 and 143:
130Several different comparison rat
Page 144 and 145:
132Three features appear to date to
Page 146 and 147:
134 |Table 14. Sample Volume, Wood
Page 148 and 149:
136 |Table 15. Total Counts and Wei
Page 150 and 151:
138 |Table 16. Recovered Condiments
Page 152 and 153:
|140FeatureTotalWood Monocot PineRe
Page 154 and 155:
142 |FeatureRedElm/ HophornbeamMapl
Page 156 and 157:
144Summary of Mississippian Period
Page 158 and 159:
146One species of bedstraw sustains
Page 160 and 161:
148The macroplant assemblage includ
Page 162 and 163:
150Forty liters of flotation sample
Page 164 and 165:
152The young shoots can be boiled a
Page 166 and 167:
154Twelve species, which fruit betw
Page 168 and 169:
156Dock was used to make poultices
Page 170 and 171:
158While the conclusions about fore
Page 172 and 173:
160White oaks, which prefer moist,
Page 174 and 175:
162The validity of this observation
Page 176 and 177:
164In the southeastern United State
Page 178 and 179:
166Gar is another primitive fish th
Page 180 and 181:
168Feature 55 (Historic Post)A sing
Page 182 and 183:
170Feature 107 (Historic Post)The f
Page 184 and 185:
172Feature 137 (Prehistoric Pit)A t
Page 186 and 187:
174Feature 219 (Historic Post)A tot
Page 188 and 189:
176The abundance of maize demonstra
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
29 2923031 29035394140Structure 675
Page 213 and 214:
201Figure 52A. Reconstructed view o
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267:
APPENDIX A. ARTIFACT CATALOG
Page 270 and 271:
County: GeorgetownState: South Caro
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320:
Page 324 and 325:
Key: Surface - S = Smoothed; RS = R
Page 326 and 327:
208 126 10YR7/3 HB 5 FMicaS River B
Page 329:
APPENDIX C. ZOOARCHAEOLOGICALANALYS
Page 332 and 333:
ELEMENT LISTCode Element1 Indetermi
Page 334 and 335:
ZOOARCHAEOLOGICAL CATALOGBag Number
Page 336 and 337:
81 122 155 404 0 2 0.06 1 0 0 081 1
Page 338 and 339:
126 208 99 1 0 0 4.02 1 0 0 0126 20
Page 340:
126 208 802 902 0 0 0.66 1 0 0 0126
Page 344 and 345:
Curation Plan for the Submission of
Page 346:
like objects, and each artifact or
show all

Archaeological Investigations at Yourhaney Plantation (38GE18)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?