12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

170origin, the lost referent, which allegory explicitly raises and foregrounds as lost and occlu<strong>de</strong>d.Such reproduction <strong>de</strong>forms the content of the letter, if we can use the term ‘content.’ Derridaargues in The Post Card, Archive Fever, Limited Inc, and many other books that the medium weuse to convey a message is not just a purveyor of information; it <strong>de</strong>forms, reforms, <strong>de</strong>ters, and<strong>de</strong>fers the message. The medium creates the message. The rule is, convey in the future and in thepast, but never convey in the present. The medium interferes and alters the message. In TheMedium is the Maker, Miller argues, “We never, with any medium, have an instantaneouspresence of the distant present. The medium comes between, and <strong>de</strong>lays, even if only for afraction of a second, not to speak of reworking, of turning “facts” into “artifactualities” (13). Ofcourse, the medium is the ghostly intervention that stains the letter and postpones its arrival.In The Post Card, Derrida purports: “one of the paradoxes of <strong>de</strong>stination, is that if youwanted to <strong>de</strong>monstrate, expressly for someone, that something never arrives at its <strong>de</strong>stination, it’sno use. The <strong>de</strong>monstration, once it has reached its end, will have proved what one should not<strong>de</strong>monstrate. But this is why, <strong>de</strong>ar friend, I always say ‘a letter can always not arrive at its<strong>de</strong>stination, etc.’ This is a chance (187). By this logic any discourse is haunted by <strong>de</strong>stinerrance,a wan<strong>de</strong>ring of the letter that keeps it subject to interpretation and reiteration. Talking aboutDerrida and Melville, quoting them, speaking for them is, to follow the filial rule, a Gothic act, aconjuring up of the <strong>de</strong>ad, of the ghost, a disinterring of the remnants of the corpse/corpus. Toinherit is not a given; it is an injunction to which we must respond. Derrida’s entire body of workunfolds as a work with the <strong>de</strong>ad. To un<strong>de</strong>rstand Derrida’s work, one has to go back to the texts herespon<strong>de</strong>d to. Like Derrida who <strong>de</strong>stinerrs 57 when reading the <strong>de</strong>ad’s work, the rea<strong>de</strong>r/heir ofMoby-Dick <strong>de</strong>stinerrs and converses with the <strong>de</strong>ad.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!