12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48Derrida <strong>de</strong>monstrates that “Anasemia creates an angle, within the word itself. While preservingthe old word in or<strong>de</strong>r to submit it to its singular conversion, the anasemic operation does notresult in growing explicitness, in the uninterpreted <strong>de</strong>velopment of a virtual significance, in aregression toward the original meaning” (xxxiv). The regression or return to the original meaningregisters anasemia in the realm of ontological hauntology 14 and narrative ghost writing. In fact,anasemia is both a matter of the trace (residue) left by the past utterance upon the present and alsoof what is encrypted in the signifier as the archive of its past. Anasemiare-turning to theoriginal meaningcontains within it the Freudian repetition compulsion that structures theuncanny, the <strong>de</strong>ath drive, and trauma writ large. In Beyond the Pleasure Principle, repetition istheorized in relation to the traumatic wound or to anxiety disor<strong>de</strong>r. In Writing and Difference,which gives us another un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of repetition, Derrida expounds that “is it not already <strong>de</strong>athat the origin of a life which can <strong>de</strong>fend itself against <strong>de</strong>ath only through an economy of <strong>de</strong>ath,through <strong>de</strong>ferment, repetition, reserve? For repetition does not happen to an initial impression; itspossibility is already there, in the resistance offered the first time by the physical neurones” (202;original italics). Situating the letter in anasemia, one faces the epistemological and ontologicalquestion: does the letter arrive at its <strong>de</strong>stination or does it fail to reach it? Does the letter reach its<strong>de</strong>stination in a different “form,” a form which is haunted by anasemic traces of its origin?Derrida’s response to the avowal of Lacan’s “Seminar on ‘The Purloined Letter’” is thatthe letter also fails to arrive at its final <strong>de</strong>stination. Lacan’s structural mo<strong>de</strong>l maintains the claimthat a letter does reach its final <strong>de</strong>stination. However, as Žižek argues in his Enjoy Your Symptom,“a letter always arrives at its <strong>de</strong>stinationespecially when we have the limit case of a letterwithout addressee, of what is called in German Flaschenpost, a message in a bottle thrown into

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!