12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

57The letter always arrives at its <strong>de</strong>stination because it is closely linked to <strong>de</strong>ath. A form ofwriting, it is the subject’s or the receiver’s relation with his own <strong>de</strong>ath. This ghostly aspect of theletter, as the loss of the letter, is a Derri<strong>de</strong>an pun on loss and mourningconcepts which areexplained in “Fors.” The letter’s arrival at its final <strong>de</strong>stination equals the meeting of <strong>de</strong>ath andwriting. Each one carries his/her own letter. Although the final <strong>de</strong>stination<strong>de</strong>athis inevitable,the course of the letter is contingent upon the chaotic and unpredicted flow of events. In EnjoyYour Symptom, Žižek states that “the only letter that nobody can eva<strong>de</strong>, that sooner or laterreaches us, i.e., the letter which has each of us as its infallible addressee, is <strong>de</strong>ath. We can say thatwe live only in so far as a certain letter (the letter containing our <strong>de</strong>ath warrant) still wan<strong>de</strong>rsaround, looking for us” (21). The letter, however, is i<strong>de</strong>ntified with its unfol<strong>de</strong>d exteriority. Itexplains and represents the interplay of signs arranged according to the addressee. In The ScarletLetter, the letter functions not only as a container of a <strong>de</strong>ath warrant but also as a perpetrator oflife, which is why the letter has a specific function (différance), but not a content, because thatcontent remainsas it is clear in the final explanation offered by Dimmesdale before his<strong>de</strong>athungraspable, inexpressible. It can only be expressed obliquely in the circuitous discourseof catachrestic tropes. It forestalls and <strong>de</strong>fers <strong>de</strong>ath by giving the narrator the ability to tell storiesand by giving voice to the <strong>de</strong>ad. Hawthorne’s narrative is, then, an en<strong>de</strong>avor, renewed in everychapter, to keep <strong>de</strong>ath outsi<strong>de</strong> The Scarlet Letter. The <strong>de</strong>sire to ward off <strong>de</strong>ath is not perpetual as<strong>de</strong>ath conquers the living at the end of The Scarlet Letter. At the beginning of the narrative, <strong>de</strong>athis present through ghostly injunctions. This relationship between the letter (writing) and <strong>de</strong>ath isalso manifested in the subjugation of authorial voice in The Scarlet Letter. The real author of TheScarlet Letter is the archival <strong>de</strong>ad father and the real narrative is the letter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!