Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

327Chicago UP, 1987. Print.Burke, Kenneth. A Grammar of Motives and A Rhetoric of Motives. Cleveland and New York:World Publishing Company, 1962. Print.Butler, Judith. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge,1993. Print.———. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge, 1997. Print.———. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1990.Print.Cameron, Sharon. The Corporeal Self: Allegories of the Body in Melville and Hawthorne. NewYork: Columbia UP, 1991. Print.Camus, Albert. The Fall. Trans. Justin O’Brien. New York: vintage books, 1991. Print.Caruth, Cathy. “Parting Words: Trauma, Silence, and Survival.” Acts of Narrative. Ed. Carol Jacobsand Henry Sussman. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003. Print.———. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP,1996. Print.Castricano, Jodey. Cryptomimesis: The Gothic and Jacques Derrida’s Ghost Writing. Montreal:McGill-Queen’s UP, 2001. Print.Cixous. Hélène. Three Steps on the Ladder of Writing. Trans. Sarah Cornell and Susan Sellers. NewYork: Columbia UP, 1993. Print.Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books,1999. Print.
328Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. New York: Columbia UP, 1994.Print.———. The Logic of Sense. Trans. Mark Lester and Charles Stivale, ed. Constantin V. Boundas.New York, Columbia UP, 1990. Print.Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. vol.2. Trans. byBrian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987. Print.Diderot, Denis. Political Writings. Eds. John Hope Mason and Robert Wokler. Cambridge:Cambridge UP, 1992. Print.De Man, Paul. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 2 nd ed.Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983. Print.———. The Rhetoric of Romanticism. New York: Columbia UP, 1984. Print.Derrida, Jacques. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Trans. Eric Prenowitz. Chicago: U ofChicago P, 1996. Print.. Demeure: Fiction and Testimony. Trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford: Stanford UP,2000. Print.. “Différance.” Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs.Trans. David B. Allison. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973. 129-160. Print.. Dissemination. Trans. Barbara Johnson. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981. Print.. Glas.Trans. John P. Leavey, Jr., Richard Rand . Lincoln and London: U of Nebraska P,1986. Print.
Page 1 and 2:
Université de MontréalThe Career
Page 3 and 4:
Abstracti
Page 5 and 6:
iiiresidues of which manifest sympt
Page 9 and 10:
viiTable of ContentsAbstract……
Page 11 and 12:
Acknowledgementsix
Page 13 and 14:
xiA throw of the dice will never ab
Page 15 and 16:
2In fact, the history of Western th
Page 17 and 18:
4allows the intrusion of the trauma
Page 19 and 20:
6A constellation of concepts and tr
Page 21 and 22:
8a series of philosophical/existent
Page 23 and 24:
10will try to provide an explanatio
Page 25 and 26:
12of the real” suggests an inextr
Page 27 and 28:
14other than the Cartesian cogito:
Page 29 and 30:
16Fundamental Concepts 61), the rei
Page 31 and 32:
18discourse may seem to be freely a
Page 33 and 34:
20is perceived as unknowableness th
Page 35 and 36:
22Thing and the uncanny in my treat
Page 37 and 38:
24of the Puritan fathers. It is the
Page 39 and 40:
26that are at once both transgressi
Page 41 and 42:
28approaching an originary traumati
Page 43 and 44:
30essential to note that the obsess
Page 45 and 46:
32later on, the post activity, susp
Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 1The Dialectics of the Tuch
Page 49 and 50:
36by the place the main signifierth
Page 51 and 52:
38narrative is explained by Caruth
Page 53 and 54:
40repeat 11 because it is only in m
Page 55 and 56:
42writing/reading itself. The misse
Page 57 and 58:
441.1 The Game of Difference/Diffé
Page 59 and 60:
46This suspension between disfigura
Page 61 and 62:
48Derrida demonstrates that “Anas
Page 63 and 64:
50DeSalvo’s analysis of the narra
Page 65 and 66:
52said to be consolidated by such r
Page 67 and 68:
54When Derrida says that a letter c
Page 69 and 70:
56evil eye is enigmatically visible
Page 71 and 72:
58The question the letter brings in
Page 73 and 74:
60enables us to better grasp the d
Page 75 and 76:
62(45). Performative as it is, the
Page 77 and 78:
64primal scenes that haunted the Wo
Page 79 and 80:
66attempt to have access to the pas
Page 81 and 82:
68a missed encounter, an impossible
Page 83 and 84:
70the disease in his own eye and he
Page 85 and 86:
72father“thou wilt not reveal his
Page 87 and 88:
74The dynamics of this incorporatio
Page 89 and 90:
76remnants of an unknown past that
Page 91 and 92:
78threat of patriarchy. Although He
Page 93 and 94:
80coherence to the subject. The sca
Page 95 and 96:
82production which engenders a disc
Page 97 and 98:
84The objet a is a Thing that is re
Page 99 and 100:
86Scarlet Letter is to see, without
Page 101 and 102:
88Hester’s shame although the wor
Page 103 and 104:
90attempt to decipher it. Although
Page 105 and 106:
921.3. Correspondence of Drives: Tr
Page 107 and 108:
94excessively cathectedan excess of
Page 109 and 110:
96inhabits silence, absence, and al
Page 111 and 112:
98in anticipation of Derridean theo
Page 113 and 114:
100primal scene poses an answer to
Page 115 and 116:
102the sense of a return of the rep
Page 117 and 118:
104over to a new authorthe ghost. T
Page 119 and 120:
106other within oneself in a safe c
Page 121 and 122:
108father. For mourning to be possi
Page 123 and 124:
110specifics of Hawthorne’s spect
Page 125 and 126:
112American national identity. The
Page 127 and 128:
114effect of the drives that try to
Page 129 and 130:
116ambivalence and doubt. Derrida a
Page 131 and 132:
118relations or formations called t
Page 133 and 134:
120materializes a certain symbolic
Page 135 and 136:
122“with his own ghostly hand, th
Page 137 and 138:
124exerting my fancy, sluggish with
Page 139 and 140:
126ties his life with his father’
Page 141 and 142:
The uncanny double is clearly an in
Page 143 and 144:
130lost by the subject who is, foll
Page 145 and 146:
132would seem that “dédoubler”
Page 147 and 148:
134automaton, of repetitionthen, in
Page 149 and 150:
136emphasis, amounting to a moralis
Page 151 and 152:
138starts with “call me Ishmael
Page 153 and 154:
140writing. In this relationship th
Page 155 and 156:
142economy, the life of the double.
Page 157 and 158:
144Whale as “a broad white shadow
Page 159 and 160:
146narrative, is beyond the scope o
Page 161 and 162:
148special lunacy stormed his gener
Page 163 and 164:
150One of the main purposes of this
Page 165 and 166:
152of the missed encounter, but als
Page 167 and 168:
154existential abyssAhab and Pip co
Page 169 and 170:
156The painting represents and repr
Page 171 and 172:
158the primal scene of experience a
Page 173 and 174:
160metaphysical, but we are left wi
Page 175 and 176:
162narrative investment in the Goth
Page 177 and 178:
164the ego and the double, there is
Page 179 and 180:
166description. My object here is s
Page 181 and 182:
168prosopopeia. Melville multiplies
Page 183 and 184:
170origin, the lost referent, which
Page 185 and 186:
172diffusion of arrival (i.e., psyc
Page 187 and 188:
174Likewise, the White Whale is inv
Page 189 and 190:
176Castaway” is Pip’s obituary
Page 191 and 192:
178hieroglyphic marks, inscrutable
Page 193 and 194:
180Considered a prosopoetic surplus
Page 195 and 196:
182The relationship between signs n
Page 197 and 198:
184reversed into presence and that
Page 199 and 200:
186lurks in all things, else all th
Page 201 and 202:
188is helical. The recurrent refere
Page 203 and 204:
190exchange of positions. Ahab, the
Page 205 and 206:
192narcissistic melancholia. In oth
Page 207 and 208:
194Like Adam and Eve’s expulsion
Page 209 and 210:
1962.3 The De-centered Center and t
Page 211 and 212:
198between sender and receiver is t
Page 213 and 214:
200most fatal casualties … you mu
Page 215 and 216:
202this. This is the book’s motto
Page 217 and 218:
204In fact, this name becomes an an
Page 219 and 220:
206revelations and allusions of all
Page 221 and 222:
208absence. Why do we need the conc
Page 223 and 224:
210the mother and the other keeps l
Page 225 and 226:
212figures in the novel. It’s con
Page 227 and 228:
214structured around ambivalence, u
Page 229 and 230:
216narrative. The rose becomes the
Page 231 and 232:
218genital symbol” (235), literat
Page 233 and 234:
220recovering a romanticized ideali
Page 235 and 236:
222manifestation of everything that
Page 237 and 238:
Chapter 3Historicizing the Missed E
Page 239 and 240:
226Hieroglyphics: The Symbol of the
Page 241 and 242:
228revisited certain psychoanalytic
Page 243 and 244:
230With psychoanalysis, deconstruct
Page 245 and 246:
232Reading Žižek reading Lacan, I
Page 247 and 248:
234Real of the body characterizes t
Page 249 and 250:
236nationalism and identity. I want
Page 251 and 252:
238of what Knapp calls the “evolu
Page 253 and 254:
240perhaps reflective of Melville
Page 255 and 256:
242the Arab is conceived of now as
Page 257 and 258:
244This brings one, finally, to Ano
Page 259 and 260:
246Aeschylus to Marx for its Orient
Page 261 and 262:
248and a kind of cultural dominatio
Page 263 and 264:
250occlusive, partial, and deformed
Page 265 and 266:
252psychic reality: the impossible
Page 267 and 268:
254material elements of the body 72
Page 269 and 270:
256geological temporality rather th
Page 271 and 272:
258This regression to the liminal s
Page 273 and 274:
260Following Žižek’s reading of
Page 275 and 276:
262knowledge or subjectivity under
Page 277 and 278:
264to formulate my argument about t
Page 279 and 280:
266essence of the missed encounter
Page 281 and 282:
2683.3. To Enjoy or not to Enjoy th
Page 283 and 284:
270of the missed encounter. Is not
Page 285 and 286:
272symbolic images and representati
Page 287 and 288:
274In our daily existence, we are i
Page 289 and 290: 276Symbolic. Their ghosts continue
Page 291 and 292: 27811 was on the one hand an irrupt
Page 293 and 294: 280inscription is recognized throug
Page 295 and 296: 282ideological co-ordinates against
Page 297 and 298: 284Is it not remarkable that, at th
Page 299 and 300: 286Derrida’s différance interven
Page 301 and 302: 288who is looking for truth. What p
Page 303 and 304: 290The ineradicable link between li
Page 305 and 306: Something is rotten in the state of
Page 307 and 308: 294The violence of the Symbolic is
Page 309 and 310: 296it was literary/symbolic and onl
Page 311 and 312: Notes
Page 313 and 314: 300an image at the most cruel point
Page 315 and 316: 302continues. At the end of the sto
Page 317 and 318: 30416 Derrida’s écriture enacts
Page 319 and 320: 306therefore, be an object that is,
Page 321 and 322: 30833 The phantom does not literall
Page 323 and 324: 310the hypothesis of a death instin
Page 325 and 326: 312however, has an important place
Page 327 and 328: 314Thus here. Man is an object to G
Page 329 and 330: 316infelicitous performative uttera
Page 331 and 332: 31864 In Plato’s work we learn th
Page 333 and 334: 32069 In Freud’s model of psychoa
Page 335 and 336: 322Others, nineteenth-century Ameri
Page 337 and 338: Works Cited324
Page 339: 326Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and h
Page 343 and 344: 330DeSalvo, Louise. Nathaniel Hawth
Page 345 and 346: 332Kafka, Franz. Letters To Milena.
Page 347 and 348: 334Miller, J. Hillis. The Medium is
Page 349: 336Žižek, Slavoj. “Descartes an
show all

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?