12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

250occlusive, partial, and <strong>de</strong>formed by many twistsbe they i<strong>de</strong>ological or psychological. This iswhy it can only represent the impossibility of representing the body which can be completelyreduced to the Symbolic. I do not wish to eliminate the body or reduce it to a function oflanguage or relegate it to the domain of the impossible Real. Here Lacan returns again, with forcethis time, to show that language and body are entirely interrelated. Like the subject that can neverknow itself entirely, language can never, and will never, according to the psychoanalytic and<strong>de</strong>constructive mo<strong>de</strong>ls, make sense entirely. It is in these very moments of language’sinconsistencies that the body exists. It requires no further argument to emphasize the fact thatlanguage and body can never exist without each other, but neither can they be i<strong>de</strong>ntical. Like theLacanian Borromean rings of the Imaginary, the Symbolic, and the Real, they are interlaced, andonly in their inter<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce can the subject exist.Perhaps the most concise instance of this interrelation and inter<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of body andlanguage, excess and lack is the excessive corporealized language that characterizes Melville’sand Hawthorne’s narratives. Language is in fact inscribed in materiality and corporealityorbetter yet, the body. Clearly, we see a <strong>de</strong>sire to reduce everything to the Real of the bodythemonstrosity and the enthrallment of the body. Everything, albeit inscribed in the Symbolic, comesto be expressed in corporeal terms. Moreover, even emotional effects and affects tend to beapprehen<strong>de</strong>d through corporeal images. However, something is missed in this reduction tocorporeality. In Moby-Dick and The Scarlet Letter, we see the ramifications of an event, an i<strong>de</strong>a,or the letter on the body. The point I want to emphasize is that the translation of the unassimilableor the unfathomable into the discourse of the corporeal misses part of the letter. This residueinhabits the Real of the bodya Real that does not do the body or language justice. We have seen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!