12.07.2015 Views

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

Examen corrigé Université de Montréal Thèse numérique Papyrus ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

50DeSalvo’s analysis of the narrator’s statement that “[t]here were several foolscap sheetscontaining many particulars respecting the life and conversation of one Hester Prynne, whoappeared to have been rather a noteworthy personage in the view of our ancestors” (30). DeSalvonotes that what is at stake here is the telling of the story of patriarchy: “ Hawthorne does notperceive the function of telling his tale as serving the causes of women’s history; rather,Hawthorne is using one woman’s story to serve the purposes of male history, both his own andmen in general (62). Consequently, Hawthorne’s reworking of this history, she argues, isactivated by a process of interpellation. Through this process of i<strong>de</strong>ological interpellation, womenand individuals in general are turned into subjects. In “The Custom House” and The ScarletLetter i<strong>de</strong>ological interpellation is conveyed through the use of tropology, mainly prosopopeia.This (ab)use is essential to trace Hawthorne’s response to the fathers’ call to remember them andreinscribe their i<strong>de</strong>ology. As Althusser argues, the existence of i<strong>de</strong>ology and interpellation ofindividuals as subjects are two faces of the same coin sincewhat thus seems to take place outsi<strong>de</strong> i<strong>de</strong>ology (to be precise, in the street), in realitytakes place in i<strong>de</strong>ology. What really takes place in i<strong>de</strong>ology seems therefore to take placeoutsi<strong>de</strong> it. That is why those who are in i<strong>de</strong>ology believe themselves by <strong>de</strong>finition outsi<strong>de</strong>i<strong>de</strong>ology. One of the effects of i<strong>de</strong>ology is the practical <strong>de</strong>nial (<strong>de</strong>negation) of thei<strong>de</strong>ological character of i<strong>de</strong>ology: i<strong>de</strong>ology never says, “I am i<strong>de</strong>ological.” (118; originalitalics)Most subjects, according to Althusser, are caught up in the meshes of their so-called free will,which is but i<strong>de</strong>ological. Accordingly, they fail to recognize the ISA, which is created to punishanyone who resists the dominant i<strong>de</strong>ologythe i<strong>de</strong>ology of the Father or the Subject, to useLacanian terminology. I take up Eric Savoy’s argument that “Hawthorne’s recurring images of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!